ABSTRACT
Background: Nanoemulsion preparations of cholecalciferol available in the market claim to have better bioavailability than the conventional fat-soluble cholecalciferol. However, limited data are available in humans for such preparations. We, therefore, compared the relative bioavailability of two formulations of 60,000 IU cholecalciferol (nanoemulsion oral solution, water-miscible vitamin D3 [test] vs soft gelatin capsules [reference]) in healthy adult participants. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, two sequence, single-dose, two-way crossover study (CTRI/2018/05/013839), Indian participants aged 18-45 years received single dose of nanoemulsion and capsule formulations, under fasting conditions. Blood samples collected over 120 h were assessed to determine cholecalciferol concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the concentration-time curve up to 120 h [AUC0-120h], maximum observed drug concentration [Cmax], time to reach maximum drug concentration [Tmax], terminal half-life [T½el], and terminal elimination rate constant [Kel]) were estimated using baseline corrected data and analyzed using analysis of variance. Results: Among the 24 eligible participants, the relative bioavailability of nanoemulsion was significantly higher than the capsules by 36% (p = 0.0001) based on AUC0-120h. Similarly, Cmax of the nanoemulsion was significantly higher by 43% (p = 0.0001) than that of the capsules. The intra-participant variability for AUC0-120h and Cmax were 23.22% and 26.51%, respectively. The Tmax, T½el, and Kel were comparable for both the formulations. No adverse effects were noted with either of the two formulations. Conclusions: Nanoemulsion oral solution of cholecalciferol showed a greater bioavailability compared with soft gelatin capsules, under fasting conditions, in healthy human participants.
ABSTRACT
Background: Titration of basal insulin led by either the physician or the patient is not well understood in India. This analysis of Indian subset of Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS) compared effectiveness of patient-led with physician-led titration of once-daily insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Glargine-U-100) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on oral antidiabetes drug (OAD). Methods: In this open-label parallel group study, randomized patients (either physician-led or patient-led [self-titration] group) followed the same dose titration algorithm (fasting blood glucose [FBG] target 110 mg/dL [6.1 mmol/L]). The primary endpoint was change in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at week 24 in the patient-led group versus the physician-led group. Results: Patients (40-75 years) were randomized to either the physician-led group (n = 39) or the patient-led group (n = 36). At week 24, self-titration led to a greater decline in HbA1c than physician-led titration (-1.3% vs. -1.1%). Mean decrease in FBG was more in the patient-led group than in the physician-led group (-53.7 mg/dL vs. -35.5 mg/dL). Mean daily dose of Glargine-U-100 at week 24 was higher in the patient-led group than in the physician-led group (30.0 U vs. 23.8 U). At any time during the study, 30.6% and 7.7% of patients in the patient-led and physician-led groups, respectively, showed target HbA1c level of <7.0% without severe hypoglycemia. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life improved in both groups. Overall, treatment was safe and well tolerated, and none of the events led to treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: Patient-led adjustment of Glargine-U-100 in outpatient setting can be a safe and effective method for glycemic control in Indian patients with T2DM uncontrolled on OADs.
