Presentations, management and outcomes of postoperative bariatric patients seen in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is becoming increasingly common and postoperative patients often present to the emergency department (ED) with complications. We sought to describe the presenting complaints, management, and outcomes of postoperative bariatric surgery patients seen in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a health records review of 300 consecutive postoperative Roux-en-Y bypass surgery patients who presented to two tertiary care EDs of a major bariatric surgery center within one year of surgery. Cases were identified using a data analytic tool, and two evaluators abstracted clinical variables, imaging, treatments, and outcomes using the electronic health record. Attending emergency physicians verified the data and an experienced bariatric surgeon interpreted the computed tomography (CT) results and surgical procedures. RESULTS: We included 300 patients with mean age 43.0 years, 89.7% female. Of these, 70.0% presented within 30 days of surgery and 41.7% were admitted to hospital. ED treatments included intravenous fluids (67.0%), antiemetics (53.3%), and analgesia (61.9%). Patients presenting within 30 days of surgery were more likely to undergo a CT (74.3% vs 63.3%; p = 0.06) and to have clinically important CT findings (31.9% vs 6.6%; p ≤0.001). More of the ≤30-day patients were admitted to hospital (46.2% vs 31.1%; p = 0.02). While a higher proportion of patients presenting after 30 days underwent a procedure, a large number of those were not directly related to bariatric surgery, such as appendectomy and cholecystectomy. Of the 34 patients undergoing a procedure, the majority presented with abdominal pain (76.5%). CONCLUSION: This is the first detailed health records review of postoperative bariatric patients seen in the ED in the emergency medicine literature. Those presenting with abdominal pain were more likely to undergo CT abdomen and a surgical procedure. Similarly, those presenting within 30 days of surgery were more likely to have significant CT findings and require hospital admission. Others presenting with primarily nausea and vomiting may improve with ED symptom management and be discharged home with bariatric team follow-up.

Outcomes of acute heart failure patients managed in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure is a serious condition commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). The HEARTRISK6 Scale has been recently developed to identify the risk of poor outcomes but has not been tested. We sought to describe the management and outcomes of ED patients with acute heart failure and to evaluate the potential impact of the HEARTRISK6 Scale. METHODS: We conducted a health records review of 300 consecutive acute heart failure patients presenting to two tertiary care EDs. Two evaluators abstracted clinical variables, ED management and treatment details, and patient outcomes using the electronic health records platform (EPIC) and attending physicians verified the data. The primary outcome measure was a short-term serious outcome, as shown in Results. In addition, the HEARTRISK6 score was calculated retrospectively. RESULTS: We included 300 patients with mean age of 78.5 years, 51.0% male, 56.3% arrival by ambulance, and 67.0% admitted to hospital. 25.3% experienced a short-term serious outcome 1) after admission (N = 201): non-invasive ventilation 14.9%, intubation 1.5%, major cardiac procedure 5.0%, myocardial infarction 2.0%, death 8.5%; 2) after ED discharge (N = 99): return to ED 21.2%, death 4.0%. Those initially admitted experienced a much higher proportion of serious outcomes compared to those discharged (29.9% vs. 16.2%). A HEARTRISK6 Scale cut-point score of ≥ 1 would have had a sensitivity of 91.0%, specificity 24.5%, and negative likelihood ratio 0.37 for short-term serious outcomes and suggested hospital admission for 80.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: There was a large range of severity of illness of acute heart failure patients and a wide variety of treatments were administered in the ED. Both admitted and discharged patients experienced a high proportion of poor outcomes. The HEARTRISK6 Scale showed a high sensitivity for short-term serious outcomes but with the potential to increase hospital admissions. Further validation of the HEARTRISK6 Scale is required before routine clinical use.

RéSUMé: ARRIèRE-PLAN: L'insuffisance cardiaque aiguë est une affection grave couramment observée à l'urgence. L'échelle HEARTRISK6 a été mise au point récemment pour identifier le risque de mauvais résultats, mais n'a pas été testée. Nous avons cherché à décrire la prise en charge et les résultats des patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque aiguë et à évaluer l'impact potentiel de l'échelle HEARTRISK6. MéTHODES: Nous avons effectué un examen des dossiers de santé de 300 patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque aiguë consécutifs qui se présentaient à deux SU de soins tertiaires. Deux évaluateurs ont résumé les variables cliniques, les détails de la gestion et du traitement des SU et les résultats pour les patients à l'aide de la plateforme de dossiers de santé électroniques (EPIC). et les médecins traitants ont vérifié les données. La principale mesure des résultats était le résultat grave à court terme, comme le montrent les résultats. De plus, le score HEARTRISK6 a été calculé rétrospectivement. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 300 patients âgés en moyenne de 78,5 ans, 51,0 % d'hommes, 56,3 % d'arrivées par ambulance et 67,0 % d'hospitalisations. 25,3 % ont connu un résultat grave à court terme 1) après l'admission (N=201) : ventilation non invasive 14,9 %, intubation 1,5 %, procédure cardiaque majeure 5,0 %, infarctus du myocarde 2,0 %, décès 8,5 %; 2) après le congé de l'urgence (N=99) : retour à l'urgence 21,2 %, décès 4,0 %. Les personnes admises au départ ont connu une proportion beaucoup plus élevée de résultats graves que les personnes libérées (29,9 % contre 16,2 %). Une note de seuil de 1 sur l'échelle HEARTRISK6 aurait eu une sensibilité de 91,0 %, une spécificité de 24,5 % et un ratio de probabilité négatif de 0,37 pour les résultats graves à court terme et une admission à l'hôpital suggérée pour 80,7 % des cas. CONCLUSION: Il y avait un large éventail de gravité de la maladie des patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque aiguë et une grande variété de traitements ont été administrés à l'urgence. Les patients admis et libérés ont connu une forte proportion de mauvais résultats. L'échelle HEARTRISK6 a montré une sensibilité élevée pour les résultats graves à court terme, mais avec le potentiel d'augmenter les admissions à l'hôpital. Une validation plus poussée de l'échelle HEARTRISK6 est nécessaire avant l'utilisation clinique de routine.