Optimizing Opioid Pain Medication Use After Vasectomy-A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To act as good stewards, urologists need to balance patient's pain requirements against the risk of narcotic abuse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively consented subjects who underwent vasectomies. Procedural technique was not standardized. All subjects received hydrooxycodone/acetaminophen 5-325 mg tablets and Ibuprofen 800 mg tablets. The subjects were then contacted by phone 1-3 weeks after their procedure with a follow-up questionnaire. Data collected included age, weight, number of pills used and pills remaining, number of days pain medication used, need for additional medication, pain treatment satisfaction, disposal knowledge, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 76 subjects completed the study. Overall, 88.3% rated excellent pain treatment satisfaction with score ⩾4 (scale 1-5). No opioid medication was used by 18.2% of subjects, 33.8% used 1-5 tablets, and 24.7% used all 15 tablets. At the end, 9 subjects (11.7%) reporting needing more pain medication. Using Pearson correlation, younger age was significantly related to number of pills used. (P <.001) In total, 648 additional narcotic tablets were prescribed. In terms of disposal, 20 (25.9%) subjects disposed of extra medication, 14 (24.7%) used all medication, and 50.6% did not dispose of medication. Proper disposal technique was known by 50 (64.9%) subjects. CONCLUSION: Opioid medication use after vasectomy is variable though correlated with age. Clinicians should weigh the need versus potential abuse to determine the amount of tablets they are comfortable prescribing. Counseling and documentation on proper use and disposal of opioid medication is strongly encouraged.

Operating characteristics of follicle-stimulating hormone in azoospermic men.

OBJECTIVE: To validate factors predictive of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and to determine the operating characteristics of FSH for predicting NOA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care military treatment facility. PATIENT(S): One hundred forty azoospermic males undergoing infertility evaluation. INTERVENTION(S): Standard evaluation included history and physical, hormonal workup, and genetic evaluation. Diagnostic testicular biopsy was offered to characterize patients as obstructive azoospermia (OA) or NOA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Semen volume, semen fructose, FSH, T, E2, PRL, testicular atrophy. RESULT(S): Seventy-eight of 140 azoospermic patients underwent a biopsy. The ability to predict NOA based on logistic regression was statistically significant for FSH and testicular atrophy. On multivariate analysis, only FSH remained predictive of NOA. The area under the FSH receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.847, which is significant. The cut point of FSH with the highest likelihood ratio of predicting NOA on biopsy was ≥12.3 mIU/mL. CONCLUSION(S): FSH remains the best predictor of NOA. With full knowledge of the operating characteristics of FSH in this population, a patient can be properly educated and treatment can be individualized, based on the specific risk associated with that subject's measured FSH.

The relationship between anogenital distance and azoospermia in adult men.

Anogenital distance (AGD) is a marker for endocrine disruption in animal studies in which decreased male AGD has been associated with testicular dysfunction. The objective of the study was to investigate whether anogenital distance could distinguish men with obstructive azoospermia (OA) from those with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). To accomplish this, azoospermic men were recruited and evaluated at a men's reproductive health clinic in Houston, TX. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital calipers. Testis size was estimated by physical examination. Logistic regression was used to compare AGD lengths in men with OA and men with NOA. A total of 69 OA men (mean age: 44.2 ± 9.2) and 29 NOA men (mean age: 32.8 ± 4.8) were recruited. The NOA men possessed significantly shorter mean AGD than the men with OA (AGD: 36.3 vs. 41.9 mm, p = 0.01). An AGD of less than 30 mm, had a 91% specificity in accurately classifying NOA. Moreover, after adjustment for age, race, and BMI, an AGD of less than 30 mm yielded a significantly increased odds of NOA compared to OA (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.0, 30.7). In summary, AGD may provide a novel metric for assessing testicular function in men and in distinguishing OA from NOA.

The relationship between anogenital distance and the efficacy of varicocele repair.

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Anogenital distance (AGD) is a marker of genital development and adult testicular function. To date, there is no data on the clinical utility of using such an anthropomorphic variable. About 30% of men will have no improvement in semen parameters after varicocele repair. It is currently difficult to assess which patients are most likely to benefit from surgical repair. The present study showed that men with a longer AGD had a higher likelihood of improvement after varicocelectomy. As such, AGD may allow clinicians to better counsel men on the efficacy of varicocele repair. OBJECTIVE: • To investigate whether anogenital distance (AGD) can identify men most likely to show improved semen parameters after varicocele ligation, as AGD has been shown to correlate with intrinsic adult testicular function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Men with varicoceles who were evaluated at a men's reproductive health clinic in Houston were recruited. • AGD (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) was measured using digital callipers. • Logistic regression was used to compare outcomes after stratifying men based on AGD. RESULTS: • In all, 46 men with a mean (sd) age of 33.1 (6.3) years with postoperative semen data were recruited. • Semen concentration, motility, and total motile sperm count all showed significant improvement postoperatively (P < 0.01). • While 48% of men with a shorter AGD had improvements in sperm concentration postoperatively, 84% of men with a longer AGD improved (P = 0.01). • There was a trend toward a lower percentage of men (62% vs 84%) with shorter AGDs showing improvements in total motile sperm count (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: • AGD may provide a novel metric to assess intrinsic testicular function and predict efficacy of varicocele repair.

The relationship between anogenital distance and reproductive hormone levels in adult men.

PURPOSE: Anogenital distance is a marker for endocrine disruption in animal studies in which decreased distance has been associated with testicular dysfunction. In this study we investigated whether anogenital distance was associated with reproductive hormone levels in adult men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 116 men (mean age 36.1 ± 8.0 years) were evaluated at an andrology clinic in Houston. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length were measured using digital calipers. Testis size was estimated by physical examination. Linear regression was used to determine correlations between genital measurements and hormone levels. RESULTS: Anogenital distance (r = 0.20, p = 0.03) and penile length (r = 0.20, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with serum testosterone levels while total testis size was not (r = 0.17, p = 0.07). No relationship between genital length and luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone or estradiol was identified. After adjusting for age the serum testosterone increased by 20.1 ng/dl (95% CI 1.8, 38.4; p = 0.03) for each 1 cm increase in anogenital distance. On multivariable models no statistically significant relationship existed between penile length and testosterone levels. Moreover men with hypogonadal testosterone levels (less than 300 ng/dl) had a significantly shorter anogenital distance compared to men with higher testosterone levels (31.6 vs 37.3 mm, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Anogenital distance may provide a novel metric to assess testicular function in men. Assuming that anogenital distance at birth predicts adult anogenital distance, our findings suggest a fetal origin for adult testicular function.

Contemporary concepts in the evaluation and management of male infertility.

Infertility in men is a common condition. At the core of the medical evaluation of the male partner in a couple who are unable to conceive is the history and physical examination. Special attention should be directed to the patient's developmental history and any use of testosterone products. The physical examination focuses on the genitals, and includes assessments of the size and consistency of the testicles, epididymis, vas deferens, and presence of varicoceles. Although many sophisticated tests are available, semen analysis is still the most important diagnostic tool used to assess fertility, and includes parameters such as sperm count, motility and viability. Treatment of male factor infertility can involve targeted agents, in the case of specific conditions such as hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, or it can be empirical-using medical therapy or assisted conception techniques-for patients in whom no underlying cause has been identified. Although an all-encompassing treatment for male factor infertility has not yet been developed, the field offers many promising avenues of research.

Do nonspecific deep corticomedullary sutures performed during partial nephrectomy adequately control major vascular and collecting system injury?

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the effectiveness of placing nonspecific deep corticomedullary sutures in the setting of major vascular and collecting system injury during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). We also aimed to evaluate the incidence of ischaemic injury to the remaining renal remnant because of these sutures, as many laparoscopic centres have adopted this practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed open PN on eight porcine kidneys. Both the artery and vein were clamped. The ureter was transected and tied around an angiocatheter for evaluating collecting system integrity both before and after corticomedullary suturing. The renal artery was cannulated for angiography before and after the corticomedullary suturing. The rate of bleeding was also assessed before and after corticomedullary suturing. RESULTS: There was marked arterial bleeding and large collecting system injury induced in all kidneys. Two of the eight renal units continued to have significant arterial bleeding after the deep corticomedullary sutures were placed. All of the eight units had at least a small urinary leak after suturing, with three having medium-to-large leaks. In four of the renal units, there were major segmental vessels occluded by the sutures, as detected by angiography. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of placing nonspecific deep corticomedullary sutures, during PN, may not adequately control major vascular and collecting system injury. In addition, segmental vessels supplying remnant renal tissue are often affected; thereby further compromising function because of devascularization. The search for the best technique for LPN continues.