Patient and Physician Perspectives on Discussing Addiction Recovery and Spirituality in the Primary Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Spirituality is an important component of recovery for many individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). However, few studies have compared patient and physician attitudes on spirituality in SUD recovery. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates patient and physician beliefs about the role of spirituality in SUD recovery and about discussing spirituality in relationship to recovery in primary care settings. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care physicians recruited at two academic hospitals, and patients recruited from a faith-based residential therapeutic community. Interview transcripts were independently coded by two researchers and a grounded theory approach was used to generate themes that reflected participants' experiences. KEY RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 15 patients and 10 physicians. Patients had diverse views about the impact of spirituality on their SUD recovery, including positive, negative, and neutral. Patient and physician opinions on discussing spirituality in a primary care setting differed: most physicians felt positively towards this, believing that understanding their patients' spirituality helped them care for their patients as whole people. Many patients felt neutral, stating that they did not feel like these conversations were necessary for their care, and that they believed physicians preferred not to discuss spirituality in medical settings. Tolerance from both the patient and physician, open-ended questioning, and an individualized approach were identified as facilitators to effective discussions about spirituality and recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Spirituality can have diverse effects on an individual's SUD recovery. Physicians endorsed the benefits of discussing spirituality in the context of their patients' recovery, while patients expressed reservations about engaging in these conversations with their physicians. This variation in perspectives highlights the need for additional research to understand the individual and structural factors that contribute to it, as well as best practices for engaging in effective, non-judgmental conversations about spirituality in recovery.

Eating disorder symptom non-endorsers in hospitalised patients with anorexia nervosa: Who are they?

OBJECTIVE: Impaired insight and illness denial are common in anorexia nervosa (AN). Missing an AN diagnosis may delay treatment and negatively impact outcomes. METHOD: The current retrospective study examined the prevalence and characteristics of AN symptom non-endorsement (i.e., scoring within the normal range on the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire [EDE-Q] or the Eating Disorder Examination [EDE] interview) in three independent samples of hospitalised patients with AN (N1 = 154; N2 = 300; N3 = 194). A qualitative chart review of a subsample of non-endorsers (N4 = 32) extracted reports of disordered eating behaviours observed by the treatment team. RESULTS: The prevalence of non-endorsement ranged from 11% to 34% across sites. Non-endorsers were more likely to be diagnosed with AN restricting type (AN-R) and reported fewer symptoms of co-occurring psychopathology than endorsers. Groups benefitted equally from treatment. The qualitative chart review indicated that objective symptoms of AN were recorded by staff in over 90% of non-endorsers. CONCLUSIONS: Eating disorder symptom assessments using the EDE-Q or EDE may miss symptomatology in up to a third of individuals hospitalised with AN. This study highlights the potential utility of multi-modal assessment including patient interviews, collateral informants, and behavioural observation to circumvent non-endorsement.

Global Trends in Blindness and Vision Impairment Resulting from Corneal Opacity 1984-2020: A Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: We provide global estimates of the prevalence of corneal blindness and vision impairment in adults 40 years of age and older and examine the burden by age, sex, and geographic region from 1984 through 2020. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Corneal opacities (COs) are among the top 5 causes of blindness worldwide, yet the global prevalence, regional differences, and risk factors are unclear. METHODS: Abstracted data from the published literature and surveys were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Vision Loss Expert Group. We supplemented this by an independent systematic literature search of several databases. Studies that provided CO vision impairment data based on population-based surveys for those 40 years of age or older were included, for a total of 244. For each of the 4 outcomes of blindness and moderate to severe vision impairment (MSVI) caused by trachomatous and nontrachomatous CO (NTCO), time trends and differences in prevalence by region, age, and sex were evaluated using a Poisson log-linear model with a generalized estimating equation method. Age-standardized estimates of global prevalence of blindness and MSVI were calculated using the 2015 United Nations standard populations. RESULTS: The global prevalence of blindness resulting from NTCO in those 40 years and older was 0.081% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.049%-0.315%); that of MSVI was 0.130% (95% CI, 0.087%-0.372%). A significant increase with age was found (prevalence rate ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.99-2.32). Latin America and Europe showed the lowest rates, with 2- to 8-fold higher rates of blindness or MSVI in other regions. The global prevalence of blindness resulting from trachomatous CO in those 50 years and older was 0.0094% (95% CI, 0%-0.0693%); that from MSVI was 0.012% (95% CI, 0%-0.0761%). Blindness resulting from trachomatous CO and MSVI increased with age and female sex, and rates were significantly higher in the African regions. A decrease in trachomatous blindness rates over time was found (prevalence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96). DISCUSSION: An estimated 5.5 million people worldwide are bilaterally blind or have MSVI resulting from CO, with an additional 6.2 million unilaterally blind. Blindness resulting from trachomatous CO is declining over time, likely because of the massive scaleup of the global trachoma elimination program and overall socioeconomic development. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Cellular Expression and Functional Roles of All 26 Neurotransmitter GPCRs in the C. elegans Egg-Laying Circuit.

Maps of the synapses made and neurotransmitters released by all neurons in model systems, such as Caenorhabditis elegans have left still unresolved how neural circuits integrate and respond to neurotransmitter signals. Using the egg-laying circuit of C. elegans as a model, we mapped which cells express each of the 26 neurotransmitter GPCRs of this organism and also genetically analyzed the functions of all 26 GPCRs. We found that individual neurons express many distinct receptors, epithelial cells often express neurotransmitter receptors, and receptors are often positioned to receive extrasynaptic signals. Receptor knockouts reveal few egg-laying defects under standard laboratory conditions, suggesting that the receptors function redundantly or regulate egg-laying only in specific conditions; however, increasing receptor signaling through overexpression more efficiently reveals receptor functions. This map of neurotransmitter GPCR expression and function in the egg-laying circuit provides a model for understanding GPCR signaling in other neural circuits.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Neurotransmitters signal through GPCRs to modulate activity of neurons, and changes in such signaling can underlie conditions such as depression and Parkinson's disease. To determine how neurotransmitter GPCRs together help regulate function of a neural circuit, we analyzed the simple egg-laying circuit in the model organism C. elegans We identified all the cells that express every neurotransmitter GPCR and genetically analyzed how each GPCR affects the behavior the circuit produces. We found that many neurotransmitter GPCRs are expressed in each neuron, that neurons also appear to use these receptors to communicate with other cell types, and that GPCRs appear to often act redundantly or only under specific conditions to regulate circuit function.