The salvage lenvatinib-based regimen provides survival benefit in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Salvage treatment for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has yet to be identified. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a salvage lenvatinib-based regimen for refractory mCRC. In total, 371 patients were categorized into lenvatinib-based and non-lenvatinib-based groups. In the lenvatinib-based group, patients who received lenvatinib at a dosage of 10 mg/day were categorized into lenvatinib/chemotherapy and lenvatinib/immunotherapy subgroups. We reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS1 was used to measure the time from disease progression after TAS-102 and regorafenib treatment to death, while OS2 was used to measure the time from TAS-102 or regorafenib treatment to death. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to compare the characteristics between the lenvatinib-based and non-lenvatinib-based groups. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) information was analyzed using R software. The lenvatinib-based group exhibited longer OS than did the non-lenvatinib-based group (OS1, 11.4 vs. 3.7 months; OS2, 27.2 vs. 8.2 months). The disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) of the lenvatinib-based regimens were 69.4% and 6.1%, respectively. Lenvatinib/chemotherapy and lenvatinib/immunotherapy had similar PFS, OS, DCR, and ORR. The adverse effects were manageable. After propensity score matching, the lenvatinib-based group continued to exhibit significantly longer OS1 and OS2 than did the non-lenvatinib-based group. NGS analysis revealed that GNAS and KRAS alterations were associated with a worse treatment response and prolonged survival, respectively. In conclusion, a moderate-dose salvage lenvatinib-based regimen demonstrated promising clinical activity and tolerability in treating refractory mCRC.

The survival outcome differs between left-sided colon cancer and middle/low rectal cancer after colorectal hepatic metastasectomy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes between left-sided colon cancer and middle/low rectal cancer seem to be different. This study aimed to examine the effect of primary tumor location regarding the left-sided colon and middle/low rectum on the overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent colorectal hepatic metastasectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent colorectal hepatic metastasectomy were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the primary tumor location (left-sided colon and middle/low rectum). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Student t test. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 365 patients were enrolled. Patients with left-sided colon cancer had significantly better OS than those with middle/low rectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.725; P = .018), with median OS estimates of 48 and 38 months, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of RAS mutations, patients with left-sided colon cancer had significantly prolonged OS compared with those with middle/low rectum cancer (HR, 0.608; P = .034), with median OS estimates of 49 and 26 months, respectively. This observation was limited to patients with RAS mutations. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, patients with middle/low rectal cancer had poorer survival outcome and should not be categorized together with patients with left-sided colon cancer in terms of OS after colorectal hepatic metastasectomy.

Surgical strategy for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver and extrahepatic metastases: A scoring system and decision tree model.

BACKGROUND: The role of hepatectomy in a specific group of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (SCRLM) and synchronous extrahepatic disease (SEHD) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of liver surgery and define the selection criteria for surgical candidates in patients with SCRLM + SEHD. METHODS: Between July 2007 and October 2018, 475 patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent liver resection were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients with SCRLM + SEHD were identified and included in the study. Clinical pathological data of these patients were analyzed to evaluate the influence on survival. Important prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. The risk score system and decision tree analysis were generated according to the important prognostic factors for better patient selection. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of patients with SCRLM + SEHD was 21.9%. The most important prognostic factors were SCRLM number of more than five, site of SEHD other than the lung only, inability to achieve SCRLM + SEHD R0 resection, and BRAF mutation of cancer cells. The proposed risk score system and decision tree model easily discriminated between patients with different survival rates and identified the profile of suitable surgical patients. CONCLUSION: Liver surgery should not be a contraindication for patients with SCRLM + SEHD. Patients with complete SCRLM + SEHD R0 resection, SCRLM number less than or equal to five, SEHD confined to the lung only, and wild-type BRAF could have favorable survival outcomes. The proposed scoring system and decision tree model may be beneficial to patient selection in clinical use.

Modeling the survival of colorectal cancer patients based on colonoscopic features in a feature ensemble vision transformer.

The prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) mostly relies on the classic tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging classification. A more accurate and convenient prediction model would provide a better prognosis and assist in treatment. From May 2014 to December 2017, patients who underwent an operation for CRC were enrolled. The proposed feature ensemble vision transformer (FEViT) used ensemble classifiers to benefit the combinations of relevant colonoscopy features from the pretrained vision transformer and clinical features, including sex, age, family history of CRC, and tumor location, to establish the prognostic model. A total of 1729 colonoscopy images were enrolled in the current retrospective study. For the prediction of patient survival, FEViT achieved an accuracy of 94 % with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93, which was better than the TNM staging classification (90 %, 0.83) in the experiment. FEViT reduced the limited receptive field and gradient disappearance in the conventional convolutional neural network and was a relatively effective and efficient procedure. The promising accuracy of FEViT in modeling survival makes the prognosis of CRC patients more predictable and practical.

Anti-VEGF Therapy Possibly Extends Survival in Patients With Colorectal Brain Metastasis by Protecting Patients From Neurologic Disability.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal brain metastases (CBMs) are rare with poor prognosis. There is still no standard systemic treatment for multiple or unresectable CBM. our study aimed to explore the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on overall survival, brain-specific disease control, and neurologic symptom burden in patients with CBM. METHODS: A total of 65 patients with CBM under treatment were retrospectively enrolled and divided into anti-VEGF based systemic therapy or non-anti-VEGF based therapy. A total of 25 patients who received at least 3 cycles of anti-VEGF agent and 40 patients without anti-VEGF therapy were analyzed by endpoints of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS) and neurogenic event-free survival (nEFS). Gene expression in paired primary metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), liver, lung and brain metastasis from NCBI data was analyzed using top Gene Ontology (GO) and cBioPortal. RESULTS: Patients who treated with anti-VEGF therapy had significantly longer OS (19.5 vs. 5.5 months, P = .009), iPFS (14.6 vs. 4.1 months, P < .001) and nEFS (17.6 vs. 4.4 months, P < .001). Patients who received anti-VEGF therapy beyond any disease progression presented with superior OS (19.7 vs. 9.4 months, P = .039). Top GO and cBioPortal analysis revealed a stronger molecular function of angiogenesis in intracranial metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF based systemic therapy showed favorable efficacy that was reflected in longer overall survival, iPFS and NEFS in patients with CBM.

Real-World Evidence of Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Taiwan: A Prospective Nationwide Registry (VIOLET) Study.

BACKGROUND: This nationwide prospective registry study investigated the real-world effectiveness, safety, and persistence of vedolizumab (VDZ) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in Taiwan. Disease relapse rates after VDZ discontinuation due to reimbursement restriction were assessed. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively (January 2018 to May 2020) from the Taiwan Society of IBD registry. RESULTS: Overall, 274 patients (147 ulcerative colitis [UC] patients, 127 Crohn's disease [CD] patients) were included. Among them, 70.7% with UC and 50.4% with CD were biologic-naïve. At 1 year, 76.0%, 58.0%, 35.0%, and 62.2% of UC patients and 57.1%, 71.4%, 33.3%, and 30.0% of CD patients achieved clinical response, clinical remission, steroid-free remission, and mucosal healing, respectively. All patients underwent hepatitis B and tuberculosis screening before initiating biologics, and prophylaxis was recommended when necessary. One hepatitis B carrier, without antiviral prophylaxis due to economic barriers, had hepatitis B reactivation during steroid tapering and increasing azathioprine dosage, which was controlled with an antiviral agent. No tuberculosis reactivation was noted. At 12 months, non-reimbursement-related treatment persistence rates were 94.0% and 82.5% in UC and CD patients, respectively. Moreover, 75.3% of IBD patients discontinued VDZ due to mandatory drug holiday. Relapse rates after VDZ discontinuation at 6 and 12 months were 36.7% and 64.3% in CD patients and 42.9% and 52.4% in UC patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrated VDZ effectiveness in IBD patients in Taiwan, with high treatment persistence rates and favorable safety profiles. A substantial IBD relapse rate was observed in patients who had mandatory drug holiday.

Protective loop ileostomy or colostomy? a risk evaluation of all common complications.

Purpose: Protective ileostomy and colostomy are performed in patients undergoing low anterior resection with a high leakage risk. We aimed to compare surgical, medical, and daily care complications between these 2 ostomies in order to make individual choice. Methods: Patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal tumors with protective stomas between January 2011 and September 2018 were enrolled. Stoma-related complications were prospectively recorded by wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. The cancer stage and treatment data were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Database of our Big Data Center. Other demographic data were collected retrospectively from medical notes. The complications after stoma creation and after the stoma reversal were compared. Results: There were 176 patients with protective colostomy and 234 with protective ileostomy. Protective ileostomy had higher proportions of high output from the stoma for 2 consecutive days than protective colostomy (11.1% vs. 0%, P<0.001). Protective colostomy resulted in more stoma retraction than protective ileostomy (21.6% vs. 9.4%, P=0.001). Female sex, open operation, ileostomy, and carrying stoma more than 4 months were also significantly associated with a higher risk of stoma-related complications during diversion. The incidence of complication after stoma reversal did not differ between colostomy group and ileostomy group (24.3% vs. 20.9%, P=0.542). Conclusion: We suggest avoiding colostomy in patients who are female and potential prolong diversion when stoma retraction is a concern. Otherwise, ileostomy should be avoided for patients with impaired renal function. Wise selection and flexibility are more important than using one type of stoma routinely.

The Negative Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Skip Metastasis in Stage III Colon Cancer With pN1 Disease: A Single-Center and Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node skip metastasis is a subgroup of lymph node metastatic patterns with low incidence in node-positive colon cancer. Its clinical significance is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in stage III colon cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational analysis. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital. PATIENTS: This study included patients with stage III colon cancer who underwent D3 lymphadenectomy between 2006 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients were divided into a lymph node skip metastasis-positive group and a negative group. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Cox regression was applied to identify related risk factors influencing survival. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were reviewed, and lymph node skip metastasis-positive patients represented 13.2% of our sample. Patients with lymph node skip metastasis tended to present with a higher proportion of right-sided cancer, lower positive lymph nodes, lower lymph node ratio, and higher mean BMI. Liver recurrence was more prevalent in the lymph node skip metastasis group ( p = 0.028) than in the negative group. The presence of lymph node skip metastasis was a negative prognostic factor for 5-year recurrence-free survival (51.4% vs 68.7%; p = 0.002) and 5-year overall survival (66.4% vs 80.4%; p = 0.024) in Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression. Subgroup analysis revealed the survival significance of recurrence-free survival ( p = 0.001) and overall survival ( p = 0.011) in lymph node skip metastasis with pN1 disease. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design, single-center nature, and sampling error. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node skip metastasis is an independent negative prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer with pN1 disease. More intensive surveillance may be necessary for patients of this subgroup. See Video Abstract at https://links.lww.com/DCR/C60 . IMPACTO PRONSTICO NEGATIVO DE LAS METSTASIS DISCONTNUAS GANGLIONARES LINFTICAS EN CASOS DE CNCER DE COLON ESTADIO III CON ENFERMEDAD PN ESTUDIO DE COHORTES RETROSPECTIVO MONOCENTRICO: ANTECEDENTES:Las metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas, son un subgrupo de patrones metastásicos en los ganglios linfáticos con baja incidencia en el cáncer de colon con nódulos positivos. Su significado clínico aún no está claro.OBJETIVO:Estudio que tiene por objetivo el investigar el impacto pronóstico de las metástasis discontínuas de los ganglios linfáticos en el cáncer de colon de estadio III.DISEÑO:Análisis observacional retrospectivo.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el Hospital General de Veteranos de Taipei.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio III que se sometieron a linfadenectomía D3 entre 2006 y 2015.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los pacientes se dividieron en un grupo positivo de metástasis discontínuas en los ganglios linfáticos y un otro grupo negativo. La sobrevida libre de recidiva y la sobrevida global, fueron comparadas mediante las curvas de Kaplan-Meier y la prueba de rango logarítmico. Se aplicó la regresión de Cox para identificar los factores de riesgo relacionados que influyeron en la sobrevida.RESULTADOS:Se revisaron un total de 461 casos, donde los pacientes positivos con metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos representaron el 13,2% de nuestra muestra. Los pacientes con metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas tendían a presentar una mayor proporción de cáncer localizado en el lado derecho del colon, presentar un menor numéro de ganglios linfáticos positivos y una proporción menor de ganglios linfáticos con un IMC promedio más alto. Las recidivas hepáticas fueron más prevalentes en el grupo de metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas ( p = 0,028) que en el grupo negativo. La presencia de metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas fué un factor de pronóstico negativo en la sobrevida libre de recidiva a 5 años (51,4% frente a 68,7%, p = 0,002) y la sobrevida general a 5 años (66,4% frente a 80,4%, p = 0,024) evaluada por las curvas de Kaplan-Meier y la regresión multivariada de Cox. El análisis de subgrupos reveló la importancia de la sobrevida libre de recidiva ( p = 0,001) y la sobrevida general ( p = 0,011) en los casos con metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas con enfermedad pN1.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, naturaleza de centro único y error de muestreo.CONCLUSIONES:Las metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas son un factor pronóstico negativo independiente en los casos de cáncer de colon estadio III con enfermedad pN1. Tal vez sea necesaria una mayor vigilancia de los pacientes en este subgrupo.Consulte Video Resumen en https://links.lww.com/DCR/C60 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Clinical outcome of local treatment and radical resection for pT1 rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is mainly cured by radical resection with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant chemotherapy. Pathological T1 lesions can be managed by local treatment and radiotherapy thereafter. Lower morbidity is the key benefit of these local treatments. Since nodal metastasis is important for staging, radical resection (RR) is suggested. Rectal cancer has higher surgical morbidity than colon cancer; local treatment has been the preferred choice by patients. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled data of 244 patients with pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma. A total of 202 patients (82.8%) underwent RR, including low anterior resection (LAR) and abdomino-perineal resection (APR), and 42 patients (17.2%) underwent LT, including transanal excision and colonoscopic polypectomy. RESULTS: In our study, seven patients (16.7%) had loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis from the LT group while eight patients (4.0%) had distant metastasis without loco-regional recurrence from the RR group. The lymph node metastasis rate in RR group was 8.4%. Forty-seven patients (24.2%) underwent LAR with temporary stoma, and its reversal rate was 100%. In the RR group, postoperative complication rate was 10.4% with a mortality rate of 0.5%. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95.7% for RR and 80.2% for LT (P = 0.001), and overall survival (OS) was 93.7% for RR and 70.0% for LT (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found that RFS and OS in patients of pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma that had received RR were better than receiving LT. Further adjuvant chemotherapy was possible for some RR patients. A higher recurrence rate after LT must be balanced against the morbidity and mortality associated with RR.

A Long-Term and Large-Scale Real-World Study in Taiwan: Efficacy of Target Therapy in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.

This study expands the understanding of the role of target therapy in improving survival of patients with mCRC based on real-world study results. These data represent potential survival outcomes of Taiwanese patients with mCRC in clinical practice. CRC is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in Taiwan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of target therapy in combination with chemotherapy for mCRC in Taiwan. This was a real-world, retrospective, observational study in patients diagnosed with mCRC (N=1583). A total of 792 patients received chemotherapy plus target therapy (anti-EGFR therapy, n=180; anti-VEGF therapy, n=612) and 791 patients who received chemotherapy alone. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined. For RAS wild-type patients, the median OS (mOS) was 34.3 months in the EGFR L (left-sided colon) group, 27.3 months in the VEGF L group, 18.4 months in VEGF R (right-sided colon) group, and 13.8 months in EGFR R group (P<0.001). Median PFS (mPFS) was 9.8 months in the EGFR L group, 8.9 months in the VEGF L group, 6.8 months in VEGF R group, and 5.8 months in EGFR R group. In patients with a RAS mutation, mOS was 25.4 months in the VEGF L group and 19.4 months in the VEGF R group (P=0.167). Judicious treatment allocation in Taiwanese patients with mCRC can result in an mOS of 34.3 months using cetuximab plus chemotherapy for left-sided tumors. An mOS of 48.5 months can be achieved using cetuximab plus chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting in mCRC patients with left-sided tumors. This study expands our understanding of the role of target therapy in improving survival of mCRC patients based on real-world study results.

Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A 3-year follow-up study.

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy was developed to overcome the drawbacks of two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy, namely lack of depth perception. However, the benefit of 3D laparoscopy in colorectal surgery is inconclusive. Here, we compare the 3-year follow-up outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic colectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients who underwent either 3D or 2D laparoscopy colectomy from October 2015 to November 2017 by a single surgical team for colon cancer were enrolled. Data were collected from a prospectively constructed database, including clinico-pathological features and operative parameters. The pathological results, recurrence, survival and systemic treatment were collected from the Taiwan Cancer Database. Results: There were 47 patients in the 3D group and 44 in the 2D group. There were no significant differences in characteristics of patients, operation data, pathological results, complications, operative time, blood loss or the number of lymph node harvested between the two groups. In addition, disease-free survival and overall survival were equal between the two groups. Conclusions: This is the first long-term result of a 3D laparoscopic colectomy. In our 3-year follow-up, there was no difference in long-term outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopy for colorectal surgery in an experienced centre.

A novel machine learning-based algorithm to identify and classify lesions and anatomical landmarks in colonoscopy images.

OBJECTIVES: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)-based artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to be highly accurate for detecting and characterizing colon polyps. However, the application of AI to identify normal colon landmarks and differentiate multiple colon diseases has not yet been established. We aimed to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithm (GUTAID) to recognize different colon lesions and anatomical landmarks. METHODS: Colonoscopic images were obtained to train and validate the AI classifiers. An independent dataset was collected for verification. The architecture of GUTAID contains two major sub-models: the Normal, Polyp, Diverticulum, Cecum and CAncer (NPDCCA) and Narrow-Band Imaging for Adenomatous/Hyperplastic polyps (NBI-AH) models. The development of GUTAID was based on the 16-layer Visual Geometry Group (VGG16) architecture and implemented on Google Cloud Platform. RESULTS: In total, 7838 colonoscopy images were used for developing and validating the AI model. An additional 1273 images were independently applied to verify the GUTAID. The accuracy for GUTAID in detecting various colon lesions/landmarks is 93.3% for polyps, 93.9% for diverticula, 91.7% for cecum, 97.5% for cancer, and 83.5% for adenomatous/hyperplastic polyps. CONCLUSIONS: A CNN-based algorithm (GUTAID) to identify colonic abnormalities and landmarks was successfully established with high accuracy. This GUTAID system can further characterize polyps for optical diagnosis. We demonstrated that AI classification methodology is feasible to identify multiple and different colon diseases.

Safety and importance of colonoscopy in nonagenarians.

BACKGROUND: With the growth of the aging population, the need for colonoscopies in nonagenarians is rising. However, few data on colonoscopies in extremely elderly individuals are available. To better acknowledge the role of colonoscopies in this specific group of patients, we conducted this study to evaluate the safety and clinical impact of colonoscopy in nonagenarian patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing nonagenarians who received colonoscopy in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan in 2016 with 76- to 80-year-old patients (relatively elderly patients) who were 1:1 propensity score matched by sex as the control subjects. The postcolonoscopy 30-day adverse events, mortality, and long-term survival were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 137 nonagenarians and 137 relatively elderly patients were included. The nonagenarians receiving colonoscopy were more likely to be hospitalized (40.1% vs 19.7%, p < 0.001), and the adjusted colonoscopy completion rates were comparable in both groups (92.0% vs 97.1%, p = 0.063). The overall adverse event rate and postcolonoscopy 30-day mortality rates were low in both groups (2.9% vs 1.5%, p = 0.409 and 2.2% vs 1.5%, p = 0.652, respectively). A total of 18.2% of the nonagenarians were diagnosed with advanced neoplasia. Among the nonagenarians diagnosed with colorectal cancer, the patients receiving surgery had a significantly lower risk of death than the patients receiving conservative management (hazards ratio 0.1044, 0.01275-0.8529, p = 0.0352). CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy in patients older than 90 years is generally safe. Colonoscopy findings that led to surgery in nonagenarians diagnosed with colorectal cancer were associated with survival benefits.

Preference criteria for regorafenib in treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer are the small tumor burden, slow growth and poor/scanty spread.

Given the unclear preference criteria for regorafenib in treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this study aimed to construct an algorithm in selecting right patients for regorafenib. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients with pathology confirmed mCRC and administered with regorafenib for > 3 weeks were enrolled. Patients with good response were defined to have progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥ 4 months. The Kaplan-Meier plot was used to analyze survival. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze univariate and multivariate prognostic factors and was visualized using forest plot. A clustering heatmap was used to classify patients according to responses. The decision tree and nomogram were used to construct the approaching algorithm. A total of 613 patients was analyzed. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 2.7 and 10.6 months, respectively. The partial response and stable disease rate are 2.4% and 36.4%. The interval between metastasis (M1) and regorafenib, metastatic status (number, liver, and brain), and CEA level were independent prognostics factors of PFS that classifies patients into three groups: good, bad and modest-1/modest-2 group with PFS > = 4 months rates of 51%, 20%, 39% and 30%, respectively. Results were used to develop the decision tree and nomogram for approaching patients indicated with regorafenib. The preference criteria for regorafenib in treating patients with refractory mCRC are small tumor burden (CEA), slow growth (interval between metastasis and regorafenib) and poor/scanty spread (metastatic status: number and sites of metastasis): The 3S rules.TRIAL registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03829852; Date of first registration (February 11, 2019).

The efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in treating metastatic colorectal cancer differs between the middle/low rectum and the left-sided colon.

BACKGROUND: Clinically, metastatic rectal cancer has been considered a subset of left-sided colon cancer. However, heterogeneity has been proposed to exist between high and middle/low rectal cancers. We aimed to examine the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment for middle/low rectal and left-sided colon cancers. METHODS: This study enrolled 609 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with anti-EGFR therapy. They were divided into groups based on primary tumour locations: the right-sided colon, the left-sided colon or the middle/low rectum. The efficacy of first-line and non-first-line anti-EGFR treatment was analysed. Genomic differences in colorectal cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were investigated and visualised with OncoPrint and a clustered heatmap. RESULTS: On first-line anti-EGFR treatment, patients with middle/low rectal tumours had significantly lower progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall response rates (6.8 months, 27.8 months and 43%, respectively) than those with left-sided colon cancer (10.1 months, 38.3 months and 66%, respectively). Similar outcomes were also identified on non-first-line anti-EGFR treatment. In TCGA analysis, rectal tumours displayed genetic heterogeneity and shared features with both left- and right-sided colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-EGFR treatment has lower efficacy in metastatic middle/low rectal cancer than in left-sided colon cancer.

Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus for Anti-Inflammatory Nutritional Intervention in Colorectal Cancer.

Malnutrition and systemic inflammatory response (SIR) frequently occur in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and are associated with poor prognosis. Anti-inflammatory nutritional intervention is not only a way to restore the malnourished status but also modulate SIR. Nine experts, including colorectal surgeons, physicians and dieticians from 5 hospitals geographically distributed in Taiwan, attended the consensus meeting in Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons for a 3-round discussion and achieved the consensus based on a systematic literature review of clinical studies and published guidelines. The consensus recommends that assessment of nutritional risk and SIR should be performed before and after CRC treatment and appropriate nutritional and/or anti-inflammatory intervention should be adapted and provided accordingly.

Effect of Primary Tumor Location on Postmetastasectomy Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of primary tumor location on colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and post-hepatic-metastasectomy overall survival (OS) are controversial. This study evaluated the difference in post-hepatic-metastasectomy OS among right-sided colon, left-sided colon, and rectal cancer groups. METHODS: In total, 381 patients who underwent curative-intent CRLM resection were enrolled. Patients were grouped based on the primary tumor location (right-sided, left-sided, and rectum). The Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were performed for survival analysis. The univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical and pathological factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Significant OS difference was noted among the three groups (log-rank, p = 0.014). The multivariate analysis revealed a 32% lower death risk in left-sided colon cancer compared with right-sided colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, p = 0.042), whereas no OS difference was noted between the rectal cancer and right-sided colon cancer groups. The left- versus right-sided OS advantage was noted only in the KRAS wild-type subgroup (HR 0.46, p = 0.002), and a rectal versus right-sided OS disadvantage was noted in the KRAS mutant subgroup (HR 1.78, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The CRLM post-hepatic-metastasectomy OS was superior in left-sided colon cancer than in right-sided colon cancer and was similar in rectal and right-sided colon cancer. The OS difference in different primary tumor locations is dependent on KRAS mutation status, with a decreased left- versus right-sided death risk noted only in KRAS wild-type colon cancer and an increased rectal versus right-sided death risk noted only in KRAS mutant colon cancer.

Planned Short-Course Radiation (scRT) is Superior to Upfront Concurrent Chemoradiation (CCRT) in Treating Metastatic Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: To compare the cost-performance between planned short-course radiation and upfront concurrent chemoradiation on metastatic rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 75 patients with metastatic rectal cancer who underwent planned short-course radiation or upfront concurrent chemoradiation were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute the survival rates. The χ2 test was used to compare baseline characteristics. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine the prognostic influence of clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: The planned short-course radiation is superior to upfront concurrent chemoradiation in overall survival for the patients with metastatic rectal cancer (34.8 vs. 20.2 months, P = 0.010). The planned short-course radiation was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.009, HR (95% CI) = 0.319(0.135-0.752)). The efficacy of radiation on downstaging was similar between planned short-course radiation and upfront concurrent chemoradiation. The total cost of concurrent chemoradiation is 4.52-fold more expensive than that of short-course radiation (340,142 vs. 75,106 NT dollars, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the impressive cost-performance of planned short-course radiation compared with upfront concurrent chemoradiation (better OS, modest downstaging and lower cost), planned short-course radiation should be the preferred radiation approach for managing metastatic rectal cancer.

Comparing Late-line Treatment Sequence of Regorafenib and Reduced-intensity FOLFOXIRI for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both regorafenib and reduced-intensity FOLFOXIRI (riFOLFOXIRI) prolong survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the sequence in which they should be administrated first in late-line treatment for refractory mCRC remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study that reviewed data from patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, with mCRC refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, cetuximab (wild-type RAS), and bevacizumab. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a regorafenib-first group and a riFOLFOXIRI-first group. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze survival, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A total of 136 and 55 patients followed a regorafenib-first or riFOLFOXIRI-first treatment strategy, respectively. At baseline, patient characteristics were similar between the groups, except for younger age in the riFOLFOXIRI-first group. The regorafenib-first group had better overall survival (13.8 vs. 10.7 mo, P=0.038), whereas patients in the riFOLFOXIRI-first group had a better partial response rate (P=0.005) but a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects (P=0.004) and cross-over to regorafenib (P<0.001). Thus, no significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (regorafenib-first strategy: 3.17 mo; riFOLFOXIRI-first strategy: 4.97 mo; P=0.624). Regorafenib-first strategy, sex, and pathology were identified as independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that younger age, better performance status, stage IV disease, and mutant RAS gene favored the regorafenib-first strategy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with regorafenib-first followed by riFOLFOXIRI resulted in better overall survival when given as late-line treatment for patients with refractory mCRC.

Risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing and its impact on prolonged hospital stay after abdominoperineal resection.

BACKGROUND: Perineal wound complications are a long-lasting issue for abdominoperineal resection (APR) patients. Complication rates as high as 60% have been reported, with the most common complication being delayed perineal wound healing. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing and its impact on prolonged hospital stay. METHODS: We included low rectal tumor patients who underwent APR at a referral medical center from April 2002 to December 2017; a total of 229 patients were included. The basic characteristics and surgical outcomes of the patients were analyzed to identify risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing (> 30 days after APR) and prolonged hospital stay (post-APR hospital stay > 14 days). RESULTS: All patients received primary closure for their perineal wound. The majority of patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (N = 213, 93.1%). In the univariate analysis, patients with hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5 g/dL) had an increased risk of delayed wound healing (39.5% vs. 60.5%, P = 0.001), which was an independent risk factor in the multivariable analysis (OR 2.962, 95% CI 1.437-6.102, P = 0.003). Patients with delayed wound healing also had a significantly increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR 6.404, 95% CI 3.508-11.694, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoalbuminemia was an independent risk factor for delayed wound healing, which consequently led to a prolonged hospital stay. Further clinical trials are needed to reduce the incidence of delayed perineal wound healing by correcting albumin levels or nutritional status before APR.