Lumbar intrathecal administration of the quaternary lidocaine derivative, QX-314, produces irritation and death in mice.

BACKGROUND: We recently found that peripheral administration of the quaternary lidocaine derivative, QX-314, produces long-lasting sensory and motor blockade in animals. The goal of this study was to test whether intrathecal QX-314 has similar properties. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-controlled, blinded study with female CD-1 mice. Animals in the treatment group received lumbar intrathecal QX-314 (0.5-10 mM; volume, 2 microl; each concentration, n = 6). Normal saline and lidocaine (70 mM) served as negative and positive controls (each group, n = 12), respectively. Animals were tested for up to 3 h for lumbosacral neural blockade and observed for adverse effects. RESULTS: No animal injected with saline and 11 of 12 (92%) animals injected with lidocaine displayed reversible lumbosacral motor blockade (P < 0.001). QX-314 (5 mM) produced motor blockade in four of the six (67%) and sensory blockade in five of the six animals (83%; P < 0.05 vs. saline). However, six of the six mice (100%) at 5 mM QX-314 and five of the six (83%) at 10 mM exhibited marked irritation; one of the six animals at 5 mM (17%) and two of the six at 10 mM (33%) died. We observed no neural blockade without adverse effects in any animal injected with QX-314. All animals injected with saline and 11 of the 12 (92%) animals injected with lidocaine demonstrated normal behavior. CONCLUSION: Lumbar intrathecal QX-314 concentration-dependently produced irritation and death in mice, at lower concentrations than those associated with robust motor blockade. Although QX-314 did produce long-lasting neural blockade, these findings indicate that QX-314 is unlikely to be a suitable candidate for spinal anesthesia in humans.

Analgesic properties of the novel amino acid, isovaline.

BACKGROUND: Isovaline, a nonproteinogenic alpha-amino acid rarely found in the biosphere, is structurally similar to the inhibitory neurotransmitters glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid. Because glycine(A) and gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor agonists are antiallodynic, we hypothesized that isovaline produces antinociception in mice. METHODS: All experiments were performed on female CD-1 mice using a blinded, randomized, and controlled design. The effects of RS-isovaline were studied on nociceptive responses to (1) formalin injection into the hindpaw; (2) glutamate injection into the hindpaw; and (3) strychnine injection either into the lumbar intrathecal space or cisterna magna. We determined the effects of IV RS-isovaline (50, 150, or 500 mg/kg; n = 10/dose) or intrathecal RS-, R-, and S-isovaline, glycine, and beta-alanine into the lumbar intrathecal space (5-microL volumes of 60, 125, 250, and 500 mM; n = 9/dose/group) on the response to formalin in the paw. The response to 20 microL intraplantar glutamate (750 mM) was compared with glutamate (750 mM) coadministered with isovaline. We also determined the response to intraplantar strychnine. Lumbar intrathecal (100 microM) or intracisternal (200 microM) injections of strychnine into the lumbar intrathecal space or the cisterna magna were used to induce allodynia as a measure of glycine inhibitory dysfunction. The effects of intrathecal or intracisternal strychnine were compared with isovaline coapplied with the strychnine (n = 8/group). RESULTS: In the formalin paw test, IV isovaline did not change phase I but decreased phase II responses in a dose-dependent manner (50% effective dose = 66 mg/kg, n = 10, P < 0.01). There was no effect on rotarod performance, appearance, or behavior of the mouse, and no respiratory depression. Intrathecal isovaline, glycine, and beta-alanine attenuated phase I and II responses (P < 0.01 for each drug). In contrast to beta-alanine and glycine, isovaline at maximally effective doses did not produce scratching, biting, or agitation. Intrathecal RS- and S-isovaline attenuated phase I (P < 0.05 for each group) and RS-, R-, and S-isovaline attenuated phase II responses (P < 0.05 for each group), with no significant difference between the efficacies of R- and S-enantiomers. Localized strychnine-induced glycine inhibitory dysfunction was greatly reduced by intracisternal (P < 0.01) and intrathecal (P < 0.01) isovaline. Although intraplantar strychnine did not induce peripheral allodynia, high doses of isovaline did not block the peripheral allodynia induced by glutamate. CONCLUSIONS: Isovaline reduced responses in mouse pain models without producing acute toxicity, possibly by enhancing receptor modulation of nociceptive information.

Effects of local tramadol administration on peripheral glutamate-induced nociceptive behaviour in mice.

PURPOSE: The use of peripheral tramadol to block pain has been advocated. However, since its actions in the periphery have not been elucidated fully, we tested the hypothesis that peripheral tramadol blocks peripheral glutamate-induced nociceptive behaviour in mice. METHODS: First, we compared the duration of paw licking after intraplantar (ipl.) glutamate administration, with and without tramadol, using a randomized blinded controlled design. Next, we established the half maximal effective concentrations (EC(50s)) for local tramadol and reference compound lidocaine in the hot water tail-flick latency test and the glutamate-induced paw allodynia assay. RESULTS: Tramadol reduced glutamate-induced paw licking from 33 +/- 12 sec to 4 +/- 4 sec (mean +/- SD; t test, P < 0.05; n = 6 per group). The tramadol and lidocaine EC(50) nerve conduction blocks in the tail did not differ significantly (84 +/- 24 mM vs 69 +/- 5 mM, respectively). Although tramadol reduced glutamate-induced allodynia (EC(50), 46 +/- 13 mM), lidocaine was more potent (EC(50), 13 +/- 5 mM; Dixon's up-and-down method; P < 0.05). Tramadol was 2.5 times as effective at blocking nerve conduction in the tail compared with allodynia in the paw. CONCLUSIONS: Local tramadol administration blocked nociceptive behaviour in mice induced by peripheral glutamate. Compared with lidocaine, the relative potency of tramadol was lower for blocking glutamate-induced allodynia than for sensory nerve conduction blockade, suggesting the activation of a pronociceptive receptor system in the periphery.

QX-314 produces long-lasting local anesthesia modulated by transient receptor potential vanilloid receptors in mice.

BACKGROUND: The quaternary lidocaine derivative QX-314 is now known to produce long-lasting local anesthesia despite its positive charge. However, recent research suggests that the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor agonist, capsaicin, should reduce the onset and offset times, whereas the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor antagonist, capsazepine, should delay the onset time of sensory blockade by QX-314. METHODS: Sensory blockade in the tail of the conscious mouse was investigated using QX-314 2.5% in combination with capsaicin 0.1% and/or capsazepine (50 microg/ml). After tail injection, onset and offset times of local anesthesia were measured using the hot water tail-flick latency test. RESULTS: Capsaicin reduced the onset time of local anesthesia by QX-314 by more than 75% (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.007; n = 10 per group) with no effect on the offset time of QX-314. For QX-314 without capsaicin, the onset and offset times were 23 min (interquartile range 15-30 min) and 300 min (interquartile range 285-375 min), respectively. For QX-314 with capsaicin, the onset and offset times were 4 min (interquartile range 3-8 min) and 360 min (interquartile range 285-435 min), respectively. In the antagonist study, capsazepine without added capsaicin decreased QX-314's efficacy, as 6 out of 9 mice did not develop sensory blockade after 90 min (Fisher exact test, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: We have confirmed in a sensory blockade model that QX-314 is a local anesthetic with a slow onset and a long duration of reversible blockade. Capsaicin, a transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor agonist, accelerated QX-314's onset kinetics, whereas capsazepine, a transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor antagonist, decreased QX-314's efficacy. These observations raise the possibility that endovanilloids may modulate cell entry of QX-314.