ABSTRACT
Eosinophilic myocarditis is a rare and potentially fatal condition characterised by eosinophilic inflammatory infiltration of myocardium. We report seven consecutive cases of eosinophilic myocarditis at our centre and discuss the important characteristics, investigation and management of this disease.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Myocarditis/complications , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocardium/pathology , Adult , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Eosinophils/cytology , Female , Heart Arrest , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography is the gold standard for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). In many patients with chest pain, no or mild CAD (< 50% stenosis) is found. It is uncertain whether this 'non-significant' result influences management and outcomes. We reviewed characteristics and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of chest pain referrals who had mild or absent CAD on coronary angiography. METHOD: All patients undergoing coronary angiography at Auckland City Hospital during July 2010-October 2011 were reviewed (n = 2983). Of these, 12.3% (n = 366) underwent coronary angiography for evaluation of chest pain and were found to have absent or mild CAD. These patients were followed up for 2.3 ± 0.6 years. RESULTS: Mean age was 60.0 ± 12.3 years, 56.1% were female. The ECG was abnormal in 55.0% of patients. Stress testing for inducible ischaemia was undertaken in 40.7% of patients and was abnormal in 57.7%. Following angiography, 43.2% had no changes to cardiac medications. Additional drug therapy (aspirin, statin, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitor) was commenced in around 14.2-22.1% of cases. These drugs were discontinued in 4.1-8.2% of patients. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and readmissions with chest pain were 0.3% (1) and 1.9% (7) respectively at 30 days, and 1.9% (7) and 6.0% (22) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Although even non-obstructive atheroma may justify medical therapy to limit disease progression, our findings may suggest that in these cases, invasive coronary angiography, may not lead to the patient/physician reassurance justified by historical data.
Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is prevalent among heart or lung transplant (HLT) candidates. Bone loss is common posttransplant, with an associated increase in fracture risk. There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal management of bone health in HLT recipients. We report bone health data in a cohort of HLT recipients before and after transplantation and make recommendations for management. METHODS: Patients over the age of 20 who had a heart or lung transplant between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the New Zealand HLT Service database, and demographic data, immunosuppressive regimens, bisphosphonate use, and serial bone mineral density (BMD) data were extracted. RESULTS: Pretransplant BMD was available in 52 heart and 72 lung transplant recipients; 30 and 42, respectively, also had posttransplant BMD data. Pretransplant osteopenia or osteoporosis prevalence were 23% and 8% for heart candidates and 36% and 31% for lung candidates. Posttransplant, BMD decreased significantly at the femoral neck but not at the lumbar spine in the first year, with subsequent stabilization particularly in the presence of bisphosphonate use. Pretransplant BMD was the major predictor for developing osteopenia or osteoporosis after transplantation. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of HLT recipients have osteopenia or osteoporosis pretransplant, and this persists posttransplant. Pretransplant BMD is an important predictor of subsequent osteopenia or osteoporosis development, allowing risk stratification and targeted intervention.