A CT-based nomogram established for differentiating gastrointestinal heterotopic pancreas from gastrointestinal stromal tumor: compared with a machine-learning model.

OBJECTIVE: To identify CT features and establish a nomogram, compared with a machine learning-based model for distinguishing gastrointestinal heterotopic pancreas (HP) from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 148 patients with pathologically confirmed HP (n = 48) and GIST (n = 100) in the stomach or small intestine that were less than 3 cm in size. Clinical information and CT characteristics were collected. A nomogram on account of lasso regression and multivariate logistic regression, and a RandomForest (RF) model based on significant variables in univariate analyses were established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, mean area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were carried out to evaluate and compare the diagnostic ability of models. RESULTS: The nomogram identified five CT features as independent predictors of HP diagnosis: age, location, LD/SD ratio, duct-like structure, and HU lesion/pancreas A. Five features were included in RF model and ranked according to their relevance to the differential diagnosis: LD/SD ratio, HU lesion/pancreas A, location, peritumoral hypodensity line and age. The nomogram and RF model yielded AUC of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.842-0.993) and 0.894 (95% CI: 0.766-0.966), respectively. The DeLong test found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance (p > 0.05), but DCA revealed that the nomogram surpassed the RF model in clinical usefulness. CONCLUSION: Two diagnostic prediction models based on a nomogram as well as RF method were reliable and easy-to-use for distinguishing between HP and GIST, which might also assist treatment planning.

Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms on enhanced CT: establishing a diagnostic model with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the non-ampullary area and analyzing the value of predicting prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify CT features and establish a diagnostic model for distinguishing non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) from non-ampullary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (dGISTs) and to analyze overall survival outcomes of all dNENs patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 98 patients with pathologically confirmed dNENs (n = 44) and dGISTs (n = 54). Clinical data and CT characteristics were collected. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors and establish a diagnostic model between non-ampullary dNENs (n = 22) and dGISTs (n = 54). The ROC curve was created to determine diagnostic ability. Cox proportional hazards models were created and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for survival analysis of dNENs (n = 44). RESULTS: Three CT features were identified as independent predictors of non-ampullary dNENs, including intraluminal growth pattern (OR 0.450; 95% CI 0.206-0.983), absence of intratumoral vessels (OR 0.207; 95% CI 0.053-0.807) and unenhanced lesion > 40.76 HU (OR 5.720; 95% CI 1.575-20.774). The AUC was 0.866 (95% CI 0.765-0.968), with a sensitivity of 90.91% (95% CI 70.8-98.9%), specificity of 77.78% (95% CI 64.4-88.0%), and total accuracy rate of 81.58%. Lymph node metastases (HR: 21.60), obstructive biliary and/or pancreatic duct dilation (HR: 5.82) and portal lesion enhancement ≤ 99.79 HU (HR: 3.02) were independent prognostic factors related to poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: We established a diagnostic model to differentiate non-ampullary dNENs from dGISTs. Besides, we found that imaging features on enhanced CT can predict OS of patients with dNENs.

Prediction of high-grade patterns of stage IA lung invasive adenocarcinoma based on high-resolution CT features: a bicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to predict the high-grade pattern (HGP) of stage IA lung invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) based on the high-resolution CT (HRCT) features. METHODS: The clinical, pathological, and HRCT imaging data of 457 patients (from bicentric) with pathologically confirmed stage IA IAC (459 lesions in total) were retrospectively analyzed. The 459 lesions were classified into high-grade pattern (HGP) (n = 101) and non-high-grade pattern (n-HGP) (n = 358) groups depending on the presence of HGP (micropapillary and solid) in pathological results. The clinical and pathological data contained age, gender, smoking history, tumor stage, pathological type, and presence or absence of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS). CT features consisted of lesion location, size, density, shape, spiculation, lobulation, vacuole, air bronchogram, and pleural indentation. The independent predictors for HGP were screened by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The clinical, CT, and clinical-CT models were constructed according to the multivariable analysis results. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis suggested the independent predictors of HGP, encompassing tumor size (p = 0.001; OR = 1.090, 95% CI 1.035-1.148), density (p < 0.001; OR = 9.454, 95% CI 4.911-18.199), and lobulation (p = 0.002; OR = 2.722, 95% CI 1.438-5.154). The AUC values of clinical, CT, and clinical-CT models for predicting HGP were 0.641 (95% CI 0.583-0.699) (sensitivity = 69.3%, specificity = 79.2%), 0.851 (95% CI 0.806-0.896) (sensitivity = 79.2%, specificity = 79.6%), and 0.852 (95% CI 0.808-0.896) (sensitivity = 74.3%, specificity = 85.8%). CONCLUSION: The logistic regression model based on HRCT features has a good diagnostic performance for the high-grade pattern of stage IA IAC. KEY POINTS: • The AUC values of clinical, CT, and clinical-CT models for predicting high-grade patterns were 0.641 (95% CI 0.583-0.699), 0.851 (95% CI 0.806-0.896), and 0.852 (95% CI 0.808-0.896). • Tumor size, density, and lobulation were independent predictive markers for high-grade patterns. • The logistic regression model based on HRCT features has a good diagnostic performance for the high-grade patterns of invasive adenocarcinoma.

Nomogram based on clinical and brain computed tomography characteristics for predicting more than 5 cerebral microbleeds in the hypertensive population.

Background: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in the hypertensive population and can only be detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The anticoagulation and thrombolytic regimens for patients with >5 CMBs are different from those for patients with ≤ 5 CMBs. However, MRI is not suitable for evaluating CMBs in patients with MRI contraindications or acute ischemic stroke urgently requiring thrombolysis. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram combining clinical and brain computed tomography (CT) characteristics for predicting >5 CMBs in a hypertensive population. Materials and methods: In total, 160 hypertensive patients from 2016 to 2020 who were confirmed by MRI to have >5 (77 patients) and ≤ 5 CMBs (83) were retrospectively analyzed as the training cohort. Sixty-four hypertensive patients from January 2021 to February 2022 were included in the validation cohort. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate >5 CMBs. A combined nomogram was constructed based on the results, while clinical and CT models were established according to the corresponding characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the models. Results: In the multivariable analysis, the duration of hypertension, level of homocysteine, the number of lacunar infarcts (LIs), and leukoaraiosis (LA) score were included as factors associated with >5 CMBs. The clinical model consisted of the duration of hypertension and level of homocysteine, while the CT model consisted of the number of LIs and LA. The combined model consisted of the duration of hypertension, level of homocysteine, LI, and LA. The combined model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.915 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.860-0.953) with the training cohort and 0.887 (95% CI: 0.783-0.953) with the validation cohort, which were higher than those of the clinical model [training cohort: AUC, 0.797 (95% CI: 0.726, 0.857); validation cohort: AUC, 0.812 (95% CI: 0.695, 0.899)] and CT model [training cohort: AUC, 0.884 (95% CI: 0.824, 0.929); validation cohort: AUC, 0.868 (95% CI: 0.760, 0.940)]. DCA showed that the clinical value of the combined model was superior to that of the clinical model and CT model. Conclusion: A combined model based on clinical and CT characteristics showed good diagnostic performance for predicting >5 CMBs in hypertensive patients.

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and network meta-analysis on the efficacy between different regimens based on Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to comprehensively determine the efficacy of different therapy regimens based on Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) for patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS) using network meta-analysis method. METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the differences between different therapy regimens based on TwHF for patients with PNS. The risk of bias in included RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook version 5.2.0. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare different regimens. Primary outcomes were complete remission rate and total remission rate. The secondary outcomes were hr urinary protein excretion, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and urea nitrogen. Data analysis was performed using R software. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies involving 2846 patients with PNS were included. Compared with prednisone, the improvement in total remission rate and complete remission rate was associated with TwHF alone (odds ratio [OR] = 4.80, 95% credible intervals [CrI]: 2.20-10.00; OR = 6.30, 95% CrI: 2.90-13.00, respectively), TwHF+prednisone (OR = 2.10, 95% CrI: 1.30-3.50; OR = 2.40, 95% CrI: 1.50-3.80, respectively), TwHF+CPA (OR = 12.00, 95% CrI: 1.10-150.00; OR = 16.00, 95% CrI: 1.60-170.00, respectively), and TwHF+Cyclosporine A (OR = 28.00, 95% CrI: 3.20-250.00; OR = 35.00, 95% CrI: 4.50-270.00, respectively). Compared with TwHF alone, TwHF+prednisone showed less benefit in improving total remission rate and complete remission rate (OR = 0.44, 95% CrI: 0.21-0.91; OR = 0.38, 95% CrI: 0.19-0.77, respectively). TwHF alone, TwHF+prednisone could significantly reduce hr urinary protein excretion (MD = -0.69, 95% CrI: -1.30 to -0.14; MD = -1.00, 95% CrI: -1.90 to -0.14, respectively) and increase serum albumin (MD = 5.90, 95% CrI: 2.50-9.30; MD = 3.40, 95% CrI: 1.30-5.50, respectively) when compared to prednisone alone. TwHF alone showed significant reduction in serum creatinine when compared to CPA (MD = -19.00, 95% CrI: -37.00 to -0.56). CONCLUSIONS: TwHF alone, the addition TwHF to prednisone showed more benefit in improving total and complete remission rate, hr urinary protein excretion, serum albumin, and serum creatinine.