A comparison of strategies for identifying patients at risk for carbapenem-resistant or extended ß-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: To assess risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR) and extended-ß-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa (EBR) infection/colonization, and to develop and compare tools for predicting isolation of CR and EBR from clinical cultures. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed hospitalized patients with positive P. aeruginosa cultures between 2015 and 2021. Two case-control analyses were performed to identify risk factors and develop scoring tools for distinguishing patients with CR versus carbapenem-susceptible (CS) P. aeruginosa and EBR versus CS P. aeruginosa. The performance of institutionally derived scores, externally derived scores and the presence/absence of key risk factors to predict CR and EBR were then compared. RESULTS: A total of 2379 patients were included. Of these, 8.3% had a positive culture for CR, 5.0% for EBR and 86.7% for CS P. aeruginosa. There was substantial overlap in risk factors for CR and EBR. Institutional risk scores demonstrated modestly higher area under the ROC curve values than external scores for predicting CR (0.67 versus 0.58) and EBR (0.76 versus 0.70). Assessing the presence/absence of ≥1 of the two strongest predictors (prior carbapenem use or CR isolation within 90 days) was slightly inferior to scoring tools for predicting CR, and comparable for predicting EBR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians concerned about CR in P. aeruginosa should consider the likelihood of EBR when making treatment decisions. A simple approach of assessing recent history of CR isolation or carbapenem usage performed similarly to more complex scoring tools and offers a more pragmatic way of identifying patients who require coverage for resistant P. aeruginosa.

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of IV fosfomycin for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: IV fosfomycin is used against MDR Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) but has dose-limiting side effects, especially in patients with impaired kidney function. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal dosage of IV fosfomycin for patients with varying degrees of kidney function. METHODS: Adult patients receiving IV fosfomycin for treatment of GNB were eligible. Five serial blood samples were collected after at least three doses of fosfomycin; plasma was assayed by LC-MS/MS and modelled by population pharmacokinetic analysis. The PTA for AUC24/MIC of 98.9 for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 40.8 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were computed by Monte Carlo simulations. Cumulative fractions of response (CFR) were analysed for each pathogen using EUCAST MIC distributions. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) and gender significantly influenced fosfomycin clearance. The kidney function-adjusted dosing regimens are proposed by using the lowest dose that can achieve ≥90% PTA for AUC24/MIC of 98.9 at an MIC of ≤32 mg/L (EUCAST v.13 susceptibility breakpoint for Enterobacterales). For patients with normal kidney function (CLCR 91-120 mL/min), a dosage of 15 g/day is suggested. This regimen achieved 97.1% CFR against E. coli, whereas CFR was 72.9% for K. pneumoniae and 76.7% for P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: A fosfomycin dosage of 15 g/day with adjustment according to kidney function provided high PTA and CFR when treating E. coli. This dosage is lower than that used in current practice and may improve tolerability. Higher dosages may be needed for P. aeruginosa; however, safety data are limited.