Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urol Ann ; 8(2): 218-22, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27141196

ABSTRACT

AIM: The objective was to compare the use of autologous dermal and temporalis fascia grafts in the treatment of acquired penile curvatures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a prospective observational study of 33 cases, conducted in Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar from March 2007 to September 2013. All the patients had stable Peyronies disease (PD). Dorsal, dorsolateral and vental curvatures with good preoperative erections were included. PD index with visual analog scales for curvature was used preoperatively. An informed written consent was taken from all the patients with main emphasis on erectile dysfunction. RESULTS: After an average follow up of 2 years, complete straightening of penis was observed in all patients with satisfactory sexual intercourse in 30 patients (90%). Three patients (10%) required frequent use of type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors for adequate erections. Overall 91% of patients and partners were satisfied with the procedure and cosmetically donor site was better in temporalis fascia graft site. No rejection of any graft was noted and glans hypoesthesia was noticed in 4 patients (12%). None of the patients required penile prosthesis. Total operative time for harvesting and application of the graft was more in dermal grafts (>3 hrs) than for temporalis fascia graft (2 hrs). CONCLUSION: Tunical lengthening procedures by autologous free grafts represents a safe and reproducible technique. A good preoperative erectile function is required for tunical lengthening procedure. Temporalis fascia graft is thin, tough membrane and effective graft for PD with good cosmetic and functional results.

2.
Int J Organ Transplant Med ; 6(1): 8-13, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25737772

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Even after adequate immunosuppression therapy, acute rejection continues to be the single most important cause of graft dysfunction after renal transplantation. Renal allograft biopsy continues to be the reference standard, though certain clinical and biochemical parameters are helpful in assessment of these patients. Renal allograft rejection is mediated by T lymphocytes, expressing cell surface interleukin-2 receptors (IL-2R) which has been suggested as a marker of acute rejection episodes after organ transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pre- and post-transplantation serum soluble IL-2R levels in live related kidney transplant patients to predict acute rejection episodes. METHODS: Serial serum samples from 75 recipients and 41 healthy controls were assessed for soluble IL-2R levels by ELISA. The outcome of the graft was also determined for each recipient. RESULTS: The mean±SD serum soluble IL-2R levels in renal allograft recipients with rejection were significantly (p<0.001) higher than those without rejection (329.85±59.22 vs 18.12±11.22 pg/mL). The elevation of serum soluble IL-2R was evident in acute rejection episodes and found before elevation of serum creatinine. The higher values of serum soluble IL-2R in the rejection group were significantly reduced after recovery of allograft function by adequate anti-rejection therapy. 36.4% of patients in the rejection group had proven positive biopsies for the rejection and higher creatinine values, which was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001). A cohort of 41 healthy controls showed significantly (p<0.05) lower serum soluble IL-2R concentrations (15.27±7.79 pg/mL) when compared with the rejection group. CONCLUSION: Serum soluble IL-2R concentrations showed significant correlation with the acute rejection episodes in the renal allograft recipients. Prediction of soluble IL-2R levels might help the early detection of rejection episodes, which may pave way for the management of immunosuppression regimes and better graft functioning.

3.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim) ; 3(1): 3-11, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21475504

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the three types of urinary diversion namely Ileal Conduit, MAINZ Pouch II and Ileal Neobladder in terms of patient preference, post-operative hospital stay, early and late complications, continence rates, quality of life and patient satisfaction. METHOD: From January 2003 to October 2007, 30 patients (28 males and 2 females) of muscle invasive carcinoma urinary bladder (mean age 57.7 years) were operated upon by radical cysto- prostatectomy or anterior pelvic exenteration and urinary diversion was performed by Ileal conduit, Mainz pouch II or Ileal neobladder. The patient preference for the type of diversion was determined pre-operatively after discussing all the three types of urinary diversions. Post-operative hospital stay, early and late complications, continence rates, quality of life and patient satisfaction with the type of diversion were evaluated on follow up. RESULTS: 60% of the patient's preferred Ileal neobladder, 10% preferred Ileal conduit and 10% preferred Mainz pouch II as their 1st choice diversion; 20% left the decision to the operating surgeon. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 15.0 days in Ileal conduit group, 17.8 days in Mainz pouch II group and 19.7 days in Ileal neobladder group. The mean follow up was 27.7 months. Early complications (within 1 month of surgery) were observed in 46.2% of patients in Ileal conduit group, 38.5% in Mainz pouch II group and 50.0% in Ileal neobladder group. Late complications (after 1 month of surgery) were seen in 61.5% of patients in Ileal conduit group, 46.2% in Mainz pouch II group and 50.0% in Ileal neobladder group. In Mainz pouch II group 92.3% of the patients achieved daytime continence and 84.6% achieved night time continence 3 to 6 months after surgery. In Ileal neobladder group, 75.0% patients achieved day time continence and 50.0% achieved night time continence 3 to 6 months after surgery. Patient satisfaction and overall quality of life was described 'Good' by majority of patients in Ileal conduit group and 'Very Good' by majority of patients in Mainz pouch II group and Ileal neobladder group. CONCLUSION: There are inherited advantages and disadvantages to each form of urinary diversion and patient selection is important to identify the most appropriate method of diversion for an individual.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...