Developing curricular-content and systems-related impact indicators for intellectual disability awareness training for acute hospital settings: A modified International Delphi Survey.

AIM: To identify, and reach consensus on, curricular-content and delivery methods, as well as ways to maximize the impact of intellectual disability awareness training programmes in acute hospital settings. BACKGROUND: With the continuing evidence of avoidable deaths and unwarranted variations in the quality of care to people with an intellectual disability in acute hospitals, it could be purported that current training provided to hospital staff appears to be making a minimal difference in the care provided to this population. DESIGN: A two-round modified Delphi survey was conducted between June 2020-January 2021. METHODS: International experts from primary healthcare and hospital settings, and intellectual disability health fields participated in the survey. Initial curricular-content items were developed from the literature, and based on the combined clinical and academic experience base of the authors. Items were evaluated in terms of agreement/consensus, importance and stability of responses. There were 57 expert responses in Round 1 and 45 in Round 2. RESULTS: The consensus was reached with regard to 55 of 65 curricular-content indicators relating to Aims, Design, Content and Delivery. Ten curricular-content indicators failed to be agreed on relating to the mode of training delivery. With regard to systems-related impact indicators, 28 out of 31 reached consensus. The expert panel identified and agreed on seven system barriers that could obstruct the successful implementation of the awareness training programmes in acute hospital settings. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international Delphi survey to agree on curricular-content and identify systems-related facilitators for intellectual disability awareness training. Potential system barriers have been highlighted which could be addressed by systemic improvement. Implications for developing, and robustly testing the efficacy of, intellectual disability awareness training programmes are discussed, as are the implications for other cognitively impaired populations. IMPACT: In order to maximize the impact, investment in acute hospital staff education will need to be accompanied by wider changes to systems and structures concerning the governance of service provision for people with an intellectual disability.

Preventing child mental health problems in southeastern Europe: Feasibility study (phase 1 of MOST framework).

The prevalence of child emotional and behavioral problems is an international problem but is higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where there are often less mental health supports for families. Parenting programs can be an effective means of prevention, but must be low-cost, scalable, and suitable for the local context. The RISE project aims to systematically adapt, implement, and evaluate a low-cost parenting program for preventing/reducing child mental health problems in three middle-income countries in Southeastern Europe. This small pre-post pilot study is informed by the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and tested the feasibility of the intervention, the implementation, and evaluation procedures: Phase 1 of the three-phase Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) for program adaptation. Local facilitators delivered the Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) for Young Children program to parents of children aged 2-9 in North Macedonia, the Republic of Moldova and Romania in 2018. Parents completed assessments pre- and post-program. Results demonstrated positive pre-post change for participating families (N = 140) on various outcomes including child externalizing and internalizing symptoms and parenting behavior, in all three countries, all in the expected direction. Program participation was associated with positive outcomes in participating families. Based on the experiences of this pilot study, we outline the practical implications for the successful implementation of parenting programs in the three countries that will inform our next study phases, factorial experiment, and RCT.

El predominio de los problemas emocionales y conductuales de los niños es un problema internacional, pero es mayor en los países de ingresos bajos y medios donde generalmente hay menos asistencia para la salud mental de las familias. Los programas de crianza pueden ser un medio de prevención eficaz, pero deben ser de bajo costo, escalables y adecuados para el contexto local. El proyecto RISE tiene como finalidad adaptar, implementar y evaluar sistemáticamente un programa de crianza de bajo costo para prevenir o reducir los problemas de salud mental infantil en tres países de ingresos medios del Sudeste de Europa. Este pequeño estudio piloto previo y posterior está fundamentado por el marco de Alcance, Eficacia, Adopción, Implementación y Mantenimiento (RE-AIM, por sus siglas en inglés) y evaluó la viabilidad de los procedimientos de intervención, de implementación y de evaluación: Fase 1 de la Estrategia de Optimización Multifase (MOST) de tres fases para la adaptación del programa. Un grupo de moderadores locales impartió el programa Crianza para la Salud Durante Toda la Vida (Parenting for Lifelong Health, PLH) para Niños Pequeños a padres de niños de entre 2 y 9 años en Macedonia del Norte, República de Moldavia, y Rumania en 2018. Los padres completaron evaluaciones antes y después del programa. Los resultados demostraron cambios positivos después del programa para las familias participantes (N = 140) en varias respuestas, entre ellas, los síntomas de exteriorización y de interiorización de los niños y la conducta de crianza, en los tres países, todos en la dirección esperada. La participación en el programa estuvo asociada con resultados positivos en las familias participantes. Sobre la base de las experiencias de este estudio piloto, describimos las consecuencias prácticas para la implementación satisfactoria de los programas de crianza en los tres países que servirán como base para las fases de nuestro próximo estudio, del experimento factorial y del ensayo controlado aleatorizado.

Implementing SAFE™ care: Evaluation of a geriatric model of care for real-world practice.

Systems Addressing Frail Elders (SAFETM) Care is a geriatric model of care that identifies high-risk hospitalized older adults, and provides targeted interprofessional interventions for risk factors associated with frailty. This post, mixed methods study sought to evaluate SAFETM Care implementation retrospectively at one public academic medical center and describe practical "real-world" considerations for implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). In addition to barriers and facilitators, hidden characteristics to consider for implementation include initiating conditions, skills and experiences of implementers, interpersonal challenges, unique facilitators and barriers, surprising conditions, and threats to and requirements for sustainability. Implementation of SAFETM Care demonstrated effective adoption and implementation, but faced multiple threats that led to failed sustainability. The public sharing of these successes and failures will help implementers understand and make progress in adapting such important geriatric programs and quality improvement initiatives.

Systems Addressing Frail Elders (SAFE) Care: Description of Successful Partnerships Across Hospitals.

Systems Addressing Frail Elders (SAFE) Care is an interprofessional team-based program, which was developed and evaluated in a cluster randomized controlled trial. Results of this trial included reduced length of stay and complications for patients. This article describes a successful partnership across 4 Magnet hospitals in the dissemination of the model. A 2-year sequential implementation process was completed, with an approach of adoption, adaptation, and abandonment. The model was successfully implemented at each participating Magnet hospital. Implementation included capacity building, organizational change, and process implementation.

Overview of the incidence, early identification and management of sepsis.

Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition that is triggered by an infection. Sepsis is an urgent public health issue globally, and is one of the leading causes of death in emergency departments and hospitals. However, consensus definitions of sepsis are imprecise and the incidence and costs of the condition are thought to be underestimated. This article discusses the incidence of sepsis globally and nationally, and the effects of the condition. It emphasises the early identification and effective management of sepsis, which remain crucial to improving patient outcomes such as morbidity and mortality. It also outlines the nurse's role in providing sepsis care.

Developing a model of family focused practice with consumers, families, practitioners and managers: a community based participatory research approach.

BACKGROUND: While governments are urging adult mental health services to support consumers in the context of their family, there is little information about what family focused practice is, nor how it might be enacted. METHODS: Informed by the principles of Community Based Participatory Research, workshops were held in three rural Australian communities in 2015 to discuss the meaning of family focused practice and how such practices might be promoted. RESULTS: Participants described the need to raise community awareness about mental illness and provide practical support to the family. Participants emphasized the importance of practitioners genuinely communicating with consumers and their families about mental illness and the need for collaborative care and treatment planning. They also highlighted the challenges of living in rural places and posed some solutions. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the results and previous literature, we developed a model of family focused practice that outlined various stakeholders and their enactments. The model has the potential to inform policy, professional development and practice guidelines.

Predicting Levels of Policy Advocacy Engagement Among Acute-Care Health Professionals.

This study aims to describe the factors that predict health professionals' engagement in policy advocacy. The researchers used a cross-sectional research design with a sample of 97 nurses, 94 social workers, and 104 medical residents from eight hospitals in Los Angeles. Bivariate correlations explored whether seven predictor scales were associated with health professionals' policy advocacy engagement and revealed that five of the eight factors were significantly associated with it (p < .05). The factors include patient advocacy engagement, eagerness, skills, tangible support, and organizational receptivity. Regression analysis examined whether the seven scales, when controlling for sociodemographic variables and hospital site, predicted levels of policy advocacy engagement. Results revealed that patient advocacy engagement (p < .001), eagerness (p < .001), skills (p < .01), tangible support (p < .01), perceived effectiveness (p < .05), and organizational receptivity (p < .05) all predicted health professional's policy advocacy engagement. Ethical commitment did not predict policy advocacy engagement. The model explained 36% of the variance in policy advocacy engagement. Limitations of the study and its implications for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.

Screening and brief interventions for substance use in emergency departments in the Western Cape province of South Africa: views of health care professionals.

As part of the formative phase of screening and brief interventions (SBIs) for substance use amongst patients presenting for emergency services in South Africa, the present study explored health care providers' attitudes and perceptions towards SBI. Twenty-four health care providers working in two 24-hour emergency departments (EDs) were interviewed using an open-ended semi-structured interview schedule designed to identify factors that may hinder or promote the implementation of SBI for substance use in these settings. All respondents felt that screening patients for substance use in EDs is possible; however, they emphasised the need for an additional staff member dedicated to these activities. Secondly, they felt this dedicated individual should meet certain educational criteria and be from a specific socio-demographic background in order to increase the likelihood of intervention uptake. Thirdly, a number of patient- and clinic-level barriers were revealed that could potentially hinder the successful implementation of SBIs in EDs.

The effect of a multidisciplinary hospitalist/physician and advanced practice nurse collaboration on hospital costs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare nurse practitioner/physician management of hospital care, multidisciplinary team-based planning, expedited discharge, and assessment after discharge to usual management. BACKGROUND: In the context of managed care, the goal of academic medical centers is to provide quality care at the lowest cost and minimize length of stay (LOS) while not compromising quality. METHODS: Comparative, 2-group, quasiexperimental design was used; 1,207 general medicine patients (n=581 in the experimental group and n=626 in the control group) were enrolled. The control unit provided usual care. The care management in the experimental unit had 3 different components: an advanced practice nurse who followed the patients during hospitalization and 30 days after discharge, a hospitalist medical director and another hospitalist, and daily multidisciplinary rounds. LOS, hospital costs, mortality, and readmission 4 months after discharge were measured. RESULTS: Average LOS was significantly lower for patients in the experimental group than the control group (5 vs. 6 days, P<.0001). The "backfill profit" to the hospital was US$1591 per patient in the experimental group (SE, US$639). There were no significant group differences in mortality or readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative physician/nurse practitioner multidisciplinary care management of hospitalized medical patients reduced LOS and improved hospital profit without altering readmissions or mortality.

Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment: transforming research findings into consensus based clinical guidelines.

The translation of research findings into practice guidelines is an important aspect in maintaining the currency of practice and adding value to research. While there has been a large amount of published literature regarding the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers, very few studies have attempted to provide clear clinical guidelines. The present study proposes a model to transform research into clinical guidelines whilst developing a series of guidelines that can be applied to a variety of clinical settings.