ABSTRACT
Septic peritonitis is a serious medical condition affecting veterinary patients and post-operative care remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate and compare post-operative outcomes of dogs treated for septic peritonitis with and without surgically placed closed-suction abdominal drains. Medical records were retrospectively searched from the years 2009 through 2019 and one hundred and fifteen dogs with confirmed septic peritonitis treated with exploratory laparotomy were included. Twenty-two dogs had closed suction drains placed and ninety-three dogs were managed without post-operative drainage. Overall survival to discharge rate of patients in this study was 72%. The survival rate of patients with an abdominal drain was 53% compared to 77% in patients without a drain (P < 0.0001). Dogs with a higher APPLEfast score were significantly more likely to have a drain placed at the time of surgery (P = 0.0277). Dogs that had a closed-suction drain were significantly more likely to be given colloidal support compared to dogs managed without drainage (P = 0.0342). Based on this data, closed-suction drainage post-operatively for treatment of septic peritonitis was not associated with a more favorable survival outcome. The use of a severity of illness score, APPLEfast, did not show a correlation between severity of illness and survival outcome but did demonstrate a correlation between illness severity and placement of a closed-suction drain. Closed-suction drainage post-operatively increased the likelihood of receiving colloidal support, but due to the retrospective nature of the study and the lack of standardized post-operative nutritional support, definitive conclusion that post-operative drainage alone led to increased colloidal support cannot be made in this study.
ABSTRACT
PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) can occur in any veterinary or animal care setting and is a particular risk in scenarios involving ill, injured or anesthetized patients. Education of all staff on the prevention and recognition of CPA, as well as the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), is vital to influencing outcome. EVIDENCE BASE: While there is a plethora of information regarding CPA and CPR in human medicine, there are comparably few studies in the veterinary literature. Many of the current veterinary guidelines are extrapolated from human medicine or studies based on animal models. Ongoing work is needed to tailor guidelines and recommendations to our domestic feline (and canine) patients in a clinical setting. AIM: The aim of this article, which is intended for veterinarians in all areas of small animal practice, is to provide an evidence-based review of CPA and CPR in feline patients. The authors have drawn heavily on detailed recommendations published by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) initiative - one of the few resources specific to the veterinary clinical setting - as well as reviewing the available peer-reviewed literature studies, in constructing this article. Among the topics discussed are recognizing and preventing CPA, staff training and clinic preparedness, basic life support and advanced life support interventions, and appropriate post-cardiac arrest care.
