Excision of Deep Endometriosis of the Rectosigmoid: Individualizing Care to the Presenting Pathology.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To highlight different surgical approaches for managing deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectosigmoid colon. DESIGN: Demonstration of specific surgical techniques with educational narrated video footage. SETTING: Bowel endometriosis is reported in 3.8% to 37% of patients with endometriosis [1]. Most commonly, the rectosigmoid colon is involved. Pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in diagnosis and for surgical planning [2]. Treatment options include observation, medications, or surgery. There are various surgical techniques that can be used for excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectosigmoid colon. Serosal shaving, discoid resection, and complete resection are the possible types of surgical interventions that are demonstrated in this surgical education video at an academic medical center. Serosal shaving is used for lesions with minimal involvement of the muscularis. It can be done sharply or with electrosurgery and it is imperative to assess bowel integrity after shaving. Discoid resection is used for lesions with muscularis involvement, <3 cm in size, and encompassing less than one-third to a half of the bowel circumference. Full-thickness discoid bowel resection can be done in various ways including manual resection with primary suture closure, regular stapler transabdominally, or EEA stapler (Medtronic EEA Circular Stapler, Minneapolis, MN) transrectally. Segmental resection is used for lesions >3 cm in size, involving >50% of the bowel circumference, or for multifocal lesions. Various suture and stapler methods exist for this technique. INTERVENTIONS: Based on the imaging and intraoperative findings, a surgical technique was chosen and demonstrated. The types of surgical techniques demonstrated include laparoscopic serosal shaving, discoid resection with manual resection and primary suture closure, discoid resection with EEA stapler, and segmental resection. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of different surgical approaches to excise endometriosis is essential to appropriately address a patient's unique pathology. The choice of which surgical technique to use should include consideration of the location of the lesion, depth and circumference of involvement, and the number of nodules present.

The cost of diagnosing endometrial cancer: Quantifying the healthcare cost of an abnormal uterine bleeding workup.

OBJECTIVE: The evaluation of women with perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) to detect endometrial cancer (EC) and its precursors is not standardized and can vary widely. Consequently, costs associated with the workup and management undoubtedly vary. This study aimed to quantify costs of AUB/PMB evaluation to understand the healthcare burden associated with securing a pathologic diagnosis. METHODS: Women ≥45 years of age presenting to a single institution gynecology clinic with AUB/PMB for diagnostic workup were prospectively enrolled February 2013-October 2017 for a lower genital tract biospecimen research study. Clinical workup of AUB/PMB was determined by individual provider discretion. Costs of care were collected from administrative billing systems from enrollment to 90 days post enrollment. Costs were standardized and inflation-adjusted to 2017 US Dollars (USD). RESULTS: In total, there were 1017 women enrolled with 5.6% diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer (EC). Within the full cohort, 90-day median cost for AUB/PMB workup and management was $2279 (IQR $512-4828). Among patients with a diagnostic biopsy, median 90-day costs ranged from $2203 (IQR $499-3604) for benign or disordered proliferative endometrium (DPE) diagnosis to $21,039 (IQR $19,084-24,536) for a diagnosis of EC. CONCLUSIONS: The costs for diagnostic evaluation of perimenopausal AUB and PMB vary greatly according to ultimate tissue-based diagnosis. Even reassuring benign findings that do not require further intervention-the most common in this study's cohort-yield substantial costs. The development of sensitive, specific, and more cost-effective diagnostic strategies is warranted.

Serial Amnioinfusion as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia in Fetuses With Intrauterine Renal Failure or Severe Renal Anomalies: Systematic Review and Future Perspectives.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of serial amnioinfusion therapy (SAT) for pulmonary hypoplasia in lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) or congenital renal anomalies (CRAs), introduce patient selection criteria, and present a case of SAT in bilateral renal agenesis. We conducted a search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for articles published from database inception to November 10, 2017. Eight studies with 17 patients (7 LUTO, 8 CRA, and 2 LUTO + CRA) were included in the study. The median age of the mothers was 31 years (N=9; interquartile range [IQR], 29-33.5 years), the number of amnioinfusions was 7 (N=17; IQR, 4.5-21), gestational age at first amnioinfusion was 23 weeks and 4 days (N=17; IQR, 21-24.07), gestational age at delivery was 32 weeks and 2 days (N=17; IQR, 30 weeks to 35 weeks and 6.5 days), birthweight of newborns was 3.7 kg (N= 9; IQR, 2.7-3.7 kg), Apgar score at 1 minute was 2.5 (N=8; IQR, 1-6.5), and Apgar score at 5 minutes was 5.5 (N=8; IQR, 0-7.75). In conclusion, SAT may provide fetal pulmonary palliation by reducing the risk of newborn pulmonary compromise secondary to oligohydramnios. Multidisciplinary research efforts are required to further inform treatment and counseling guidelines. We propose a multidisciplinary approach to prenatal classification of fetuses with LUTO to inform patient selection.