Evaluation of Helmeting Therapy Duration After Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Metopic and Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) is a minimally invasive option for early surgical treatment of metopic (MC) and sagittal craniosynostosis (SC). For ESC, however, the postoperative duration and compliance of helmet therapy are crucial to correct MC and SC asymmetry. The purpose of this study is to assess the period of postoperative band therapy and determine differences, if any, between MC and SC. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed for patients with MC and SC who underwent ESC from November 2015 to 2019. Patients received preoperative, postoperative, and post-band 3-dimensional imaging. Factors recorded included patient sex, insurance type, number of helmets needed, age at surgery, time of first helmet, and at time of completion of helmet therapy, cephalic index, interfrontal angle, and cranial vault asymmetry index. RESULTS: Patients with SC and MC had ESC surgery at 3.3 and 3.4 months of age, respectively.Patients with SC were found to have completed banding therapy at a younger age (7.88 versus 10.0 mo), with shorter duration (4.17 versus 6.00 mo), and less number of bands (1.54 versus 2.21) than patients with MC. After regression analysis, suture type was found to be a significant predictor of total time in band therapy (P=0.039) with MC requiring a longer duration of banding therapy when compared with SC. CONCLUSIONS: Suture type directly correlates with duration of helmeting therapy for patients, with patients with MC requiring longer periods of postop helmeting and increased number of bands as compared with SC.

Characterization of Regional Morphological Changes in Sagittal Craniosynostosis Following Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy With Post-operative Helmeting: Predictors for Success.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) restricts craniofacial growth perpendicular to the sagittal plane resulting in scaphocephaly. The cranium grows in the anterior-posterior dimension causing disproportionate changes, which can be corrected with either cranial vault reconstruction (CVR) or endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) combined with post-operative helmet therapy. ESC is performed at an earlier age, and studies demonstrate benefits in risk profile and morbidity compared to CVR, with comparable results if the post-operative banding protocol is strictly upheld. We aim to identify predictors of successful outcome and, using three-dimensional (3D) imaging, assess cranial changes following ESC with post-banding therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single institution retrospective review was performed from 2015-19 for patients with SC who underwent ESC. Patients received immediate post-operative 3D photogrammetry for helmet therapy planning and implementation as well as post-therapy 3D imaging. Using these 3D images, the cephalic index (CI) for study patients was calculated before and after helmet therapy. In addition, Deformetrica™ was used to measure volume and shape changes of pre-defined anatomic skull regions (frontal, parietal, temporal, & occipital) based on the pre- and post-therapy 3D imaging results. Fourteen institutional raters evaluated the pre- and post-therapy 3D imaging in order to determine the success of the helmeting therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-one SC patients met our inclusion criteria. Using 3D photogrammetry, 14 raters at our institution rated 16 of the 21 patients to have had successful helmet therapy. There was a significant difference in CI following helmet therapy with both groups, but there was no significant difference in CI between the "successful" and "unsuccessful" groups. Furthermore, the comparative analysis demonstrated that the parietal region had a significantly higher change in mean RMS distance when compared to the frontal or occipital regions. CONCLUSION: For patients with SC, 3D photogrammetry may be able to objectively recognize nuanced findings not readily detectable when using CI alone. The greatest changes in volume were observed in the parietal region, which falls in line with treatment goals for SC. Patients deemed to have unsuccessful outcomes were found to be older at time of surgery and initiation of helmet therapy. This suggests that early diagnosis and management for SC may increase the likelihood of success.

Is the Message Clear? Evaluation of Readability Levels for Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, and Craniofacial Websites.

Web-based health information is the leading source of medical knowledge for patients and families. The American Medical Association (AMA) and US Department of Health and Human Services recommend reading material be at or below a sixth-grade reading level. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the readability of the most popularly searched cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and other craniofacial syndrome (CFS) websites.Google searches for "cleft lip," "cleft palate," and "craniofacial syndromes" were performed to identify the top 40 websites in an incognito window with the location set to the United States. Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) was used to determine ease of reading from 0 (most difficult) to 100 (greatest ease of reading) and Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade (FKGL) for website content and compared between websites using an FRES of 80 to 90 and FKGL of 6.0 to 6.9 for a sixth-grade reading level.Readability was low for all sites with 6 CL/P websites and no CFS websites at or below a sixth-grade reading level. CL/P websites had FRES readability scores of 58.5 ± 12.3 and were at a 9.4 ± 2.3 grade level. CFS websites had readability scores on the FRES of 39.8 ± 13.1 and were at a 10.8 ± 1.8 grade level.Web-based information related to CL/P and CFS is on average several grade levels above the recommended sixth-grade reading level. Online information for CL/P and CFS may need to be revised to improve understanding for the public and families.

The Potential Impact of Plastic Surgery Expertise on Body Contouring Procedure Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing demand for body contouring procedures in the United States over the past 2 decades, more surgeons with diverse specialty training are performing these procedures. However, little is known regarding the comparative outcomes of these patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of body contouring procedures based on the specialty training of the surgeon. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2015) were reviewed for all body contouring procedures. Patients were stratified by surgeon training (plastic surgery [PS] vs general surgery [GS]). Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to evaluate differences in outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 11,658 patients were included; 9502 PS cases and 2156 GS cases. Most were women (90.4%), aged 40 to 59 (52.7%) and white (79.5%). Compared with PS patients, GS patients were more likely to be obese (61.4% vs 40.6%), smokers (13.6% vs 9.8%), and with ASA classification ≥3 (35.3% vs 18.6%) (all P < 0.001). Abdominal contouring procedures were the most common (76%) cases. Multivariate regression revealed that compared with PS cases, those performed by GS practitioners were associated with increased wound and infectious complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.27), reoperation (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.31-2.62), and predicted mean length of stay (1.12 days; 95% CI, 0.64-1.60 days). CONCLUSIONS: The variable outcomes in body contouring procedures performed by PS compared with GS practitioners may imply procedural-algorithmic differences between the subspecialties, leading to the noted outcome differential.

Distraction osteogenesis with temporal bone remodeling for unicoronal craniosynostosis.

Unicoronal craniosynostosis correction with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling has traditionally been the gold standard. Distraction osteogenesis has the advantage of increased size of movement without constriction of the scalp and decreased morbidity. Although fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling are usually performed at 6 months of age or later, distraction osteogenesis is performed at a younger age, between 3 and 6 months, to take advantage of the infant bony physiology. Herein, the authors demonstrate a case of distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal craniosynostosis in a 3-month-old female with significant improvement of her orbital, nasal, and frontal symmetry. The video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/519047922.