Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 49(D1): D261-D265, 2021 01 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33137182

ABSTRACT

ADP-ribosylation is a protein modification responsible for biological processes such as DNA repair, RNA regulation, cell cycle and biomolecular condensate formation. Dysregulation of ADP-ribosylation is implicated in cancer, neurodegeneration and viral infection. We developed ADPriboDB (adpribodb.leunglab.org) to facilitate studies in uncovering insights into the mechanisms and biological significance of ADP-ribosylation. ADPriboDB 2.0 serves as a one-stop repository comprising 48 346 entries and 9097 ADP-ribosylated proteins, of which 6708 were newly identified since the original database release. In this updated version, we provide information regarding the sites of ADP-ribosylation in 32 946 entries. The wealth of information allows us to interrogate existing databases or newly available data. For example, we found that ADP-ribosylated substrates are significantly associated with the recently identified human protein interaction networks associated with SARS-CoV-2, which encodes a conserved protein domain called macrodomain that binds and removes ADP-ribosylation. In addition, we create a new interactive tool to visualize the local context of ADP-ribosylation, such as structural and functional features as well as other post-translational modifications (e.g. phosphorylation, methylation and ubiquitination). This information provides opportunities to explore the biology of ADP-ribosylation and generate new hypotheses for experimental testing.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose/metabolism , Computational Biology/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Protein/statistics & numerical data , Proteins/metabolism , ADP-Ribosylation , Binding Sites , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Computational Biology/methods , Humans , Protein Domains , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Proteins/chemistry , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Viral Proteins/chemistry , Viral Proteins/metabolism
2.
bioRxiv ; 2020 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32995784

ABSTRACT

ADP-ribosylation is a protein modification responsible for biological processes such as DNA repair, RNA regulation, cell cycle, and biomolecular condensate formation. Dysregulation of ADP-ribosylation is implicated in cancer, neurodegeneration, and viral infection. We developed ADPriboDB (adpribodb.leunglab.org) to facilitate studies in uncovering insights into the mechanisms and biological significance of ADP-ribosylation. ADPriboDB 2.0 serves as a one-stop repository comprising 48,346 entries and 9,097 ADP-ribosylated proteins, of which 6,708 were newly identified since the original database release. In this updated version, we provide information regarding the sites of ADP-ribosylation in 32,946 entries. The wealth of information allows us to interrogate existing databases or newly available data. For example, we found that ADP-ribosylated substrates are significantly associated with the recently identified human protein interaction networks associated with SARS-CoV-2, which encodes a conserved protein domain called macrodomain that binds and removes ADP-ribosylation. In addition, we create a new interactive tool to visualize the local context of ADP-ribosylation, such as structural and functional features as well as other post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation, methylation and ubiquitination). This information provides opportunities to explore the biology of ADP-ribosylation and generate new hypotheses for experimental testing.

4.
World Neurosurg ; 122: 433-440, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30465951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to prevent early posttraumatic seizure (PTS) for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently recommended, although published studies present contradictory results concerning the protective effect of AEDs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the association between the use of prophylactic AEDs, particularly of the 4 main drugs of interest (phenytoin, levetiracetam, valproate, or carbamazepine) versus placebo or no treatment, and risk of early seizures after TBI. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The selection criteria were English written randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, comparing AEDs with placebo or no treatment, for prevention of early PTS. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to assess heterogeneity sources. RESULTS: This research included 3 RCTs (750 patients) and 6 observational studies (3362 patients), analyzing the efficacy of phenytoin, levetiracetam, and valproate. The pooled RR estimate across RCTs trended toward a protective effect (RR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-1.72; I2 = 59.5%); a significant protective association was shown when pooling the results across all 6 observational studies (RR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.62; I2 = 0%). When stratifying the observational studies by drug, no significant difference was observed (P interaction = 0.73). Begg and Egger tests indicated no publication bias among observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Only modest evidence suggested effectiveness of AEDs as prophylaxis of early PTS. Phenytoin was the most studied drug; more prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy of other AEDs.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Epilepsy, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Epilepsy, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 45(D1): D204-D209, 2017 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27507885

ABSTRACT

ADP-ribosylation refers to the addition of one or more ADP-ribose units onto proteins post-translationally. This protein modification is often added by ADP-ribosyltransferases, commonly known as PARPs, but it can also be added by other enzymes, including sirtuins or bacterial toxins. While past literature has utilized a variety of methods to identify ADP-ribosylated proteins, recent proteomics studies bring the power of mass spectrometry to determine sites of the modification. To appreciate the diverse roles of ADP-ribosylation across the proteome, we have created ADPriboDB - a database of ADP-ribosylated proteins (http://ADPriboDB.leunglab.org). Each entry of ADPriboDB is annotated manually by at least two independent curators from the literature between January 1975 and July 2015. The current database includes over 12 400 protein entries from 459 publications, identifying 2389 unique proteins. Here, we describe the structure and the current state of ADPriboDB as well as the criteria for entry inclusion. Using this aggregate data, we identified a statistically significant enrichment of ADP-ribosylated proteins in non-membranous RNA granules. To our knowledge, ADPriboDB is the first publicly available database encapsulating ADP-ribosylated proteins identified from the past 40 years, with a hope to facilitate the research of both basic scientists and clinicians to better understand ADP-ribosylation at the molecular level.


Subject(s)
ADP-Ribosylation , Databases, Protein , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Animals , Bibliometrics , Forecasting , Humans , Proteome
7.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 6(1)2016 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26838801

ABSTRACT

Identification of alterations in ALK gene and development of ALK-directed therapies have increased the need for accurate and efficient detection methodologies. To date, research has focused on the concordance between the two most commonly used technologies, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, inter-test concordance reflects only one, albeit important, aspect of the diagnostic process; laboratories, hospitals, and payors must understand the cost and workflow of ALK rearrangement detection strategies. Through literature review combined with interviews of pathologists and laboratory directors in the U.S. and Europe, a cost-impact model was developed that compared four alternative testing strategies-IHC only, FISH only, IHC pre-screen followed by FISH confirmation, and parallel testing by both IHC and FISH. Interviews were focused on costs of reagents, consumables, equipment, and personnel. The resulting model showed that testing by IHC alone cost less ($90.07 in the U.S., $68.69 in Europe) than either independent or parallel testing by both FISH and IHC ($441.85 in the U.S. and $279.46 in Europe). The strategies differed in cost of execution, turnaround time, reimbursement, and number of positive results detected, suggesting that laboratories must weigh the costs and the clinical benefit of available ALK testing strategies.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...