Comparison between neonatal outcomes of labor and delivery with labor neuraxial analgesia and without analgesia: A propensity score-matched study.

AIM: This single-center observational study aimed to investigate the association between labor neuraxial analgesia (LNA) and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary perinatal center and included all vaginal deliveries performed between November 2015 and December 2021. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between deliveries with LNA (LNA group) and without analgesia (control group). Propensity score (PS) matching was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We included 2343 singleton deliveries performed in 1367 nulliparous and 976 multiparous women, in whom LNA was induced in 352 and 178 deliveries, respectively. After PS matching, the nulliparous LNA group had a significantly higher incidence of Apgar scores <7 at 1 (7.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.0139) and 5 min (2.3% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.0397) and meconium staining (29.8% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.0272) than the nulliparous control group. Other neonatal outcomes, including umbilical artery pH and neonatal intensive care unit admission rate, were comparable between the nulliparous LNA and control groups. No significant differences in neonatal outcomes were seen in multiparous women. Regarding fetal heart rate abnormalities, severe late deceleration (4.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0036) and severe prolonged deceleration (17.0% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.0224) were more common in the nulliparous LNA group than in the nulliparous control group, and the multiparous LNA group exhibited more severe variable deceleration (21.3% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0485) than the multiparous control group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LNA is associated with short-term adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes in vaginal deliveries. LNA should be performed with precautionary measures and adequate medical resources.

Thromboembolic events in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: ecological assessment with a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombosis is a common complication of the novel COVID-19. Pre-COVID-19 studies reported racial differences in the risk of developing thrombosis. This study aimed to describe the geographical variations in the reported incidences and outcomes of thromboembolic events and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. The final search for randomised clinical trials was carried out in January 2022. Screening eligible articles and data extraction were independently performed in duplicate by multiple reviewers. DESIGN: Scoping review. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Libraries were searched using terms related to COVID-19 and thromboembolism. SETTING: Hospitals all over the world. PARTICIPANTS: In-hospital patients with COVID-19. OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and the prophylactic anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS: In total, 283 studies were eligible, representing (239 observational studies, 39 case series and 7 interventional studies). The incidence of DVT was the highest in Asia (40.8%) and hospital mortality was high (22.7%). However, the incidence of PE was not very high in Asia (3.2%). On the contrary, the incidence of PE was the highest in the Middle East (16.2%) and Europe (14. 6%). Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin was the main treatment provided in all areas. Four of the seven randomised clinical trials were conducted internationally. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DVT was the highest in Asia. The incidence of PE was higher in the Middle East and Europe; however, detection bias during the pandemic cannot be ruled out. There were no major differences in the type or dose of prophylactic anticoagulants used for thromboprophylaxis among the regions.

Correlation between Odor Concentration and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Composition of Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS).

We examined the correlation between the odor concentration and the chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Three types of ETS samples were prepared: secondhand smoke (SHS), thirdhand smoke (THS), and field ETS samples from an outside smoking area. The odor concentrations of the ETS, SHS, and THS samples were determined by the triangle-odor-bag method, and the chemical compositions were determined by proton transfer mass spectrometry. The odor concentration of the SHS samples was three or four orders of magnitude higher than that of the field ETS samples, and three orders of magnitude higher than that of the THS samples. The concentration ratios of the constituent chemicals in THS to those in SHS were about 10-4, corresponding to the ratio of the odor concentration. The concentration ratios of the constituent chemicals in the field ETS samples were much lower than the ratios of the odor concentrations. This suggests that the main contributing components to the odor of the field ETS samples are different from those in SHS and THS. The main contributors of the odor in the field ETS samples could be acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acetic acid, and other unknown components with a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 39 and 43.