A novel UPLC-MS-MS method for simultaneous determination of seven uremic retention toxins with cardiovascular relevance in chronic kidney disease patients.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a devastating illness characterized by accumulation of uremic retention solutes in the body. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a simple, rapid, and robust UPLC-MS-MS method for simultaneous determination, in serum, of seven organic acid uremic retention toxins, namely uric acid (UA), hippuric acid (HA), indoxylsulfate (IS), p-cresylglucuronide (pCG), p-cresylsulfate (pCS), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF). Isotopically labeled internal standards (d(5)-HA; 1,3-(15)N(2)-UA, and d(5)-IAA) were used to correct for variations in sample preparation and system performance. Separation on a C18 column was followed by negative electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometric detection. Accuracy was below the 15 % threshold. Within-day precision varied from 0.60 to 4.54 % and between-day precision was below 13.33 % for all compounds. The applicability of the method was evaluated by analyzing 78 serum samples originating both from healthy controls and from patients at different stages of CKD. These results were compared with those obtained by use of conventional HPLC-PDA-FLD methods. A good correlation was obtained between both methods for all compounds.

Removal of water-soluble and protein-bound solutes with reversed mid-dilution versus post-dilution haemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Convective dialysis strategies are superior in the removal of protein-bound uraemic retention solutes. Mid-dilution and mixed-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), both combining pre-dilution and post-dilution, are promising options to further improve removal capacity and have been shown of additional benefit for large middle molecules. In this study, we compared the removal of small water-soluble and protein-bound solutes in post-dilution versus mid-dilution HDF. METHODS: Fourteen chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients were included in this crossover study. Patients were kept for 4 weeks on high-flux HD. On the mid-week session of Weeks 3 and 4, either post-dilution or reversed mid-dilution HDF were applied, in random order. Blood and dialysate flows were maintained at 300 and 800 mL/min, while the substitution flow was 75 mL/min in post-dilution and 150 mL/min in mid-dilution HDF. Based on the data collected during the sessions under study, extraction ratio (ER) and reduction ratio (RR) of small water-soluble and protein-bound solutes were calculated, as well as total solute removal (TSR) based on spent dialysate. RESULTS: No differences were observed for TSR, ER and RR for protein-bound solutes. For small water-soluble solutes, ER in post-dilution HDF was significantly higher than in mid-dilution HDF: 0.92 ± 0.02 versus 0.87 ± 0.04 for urea (P < 0.001), 0.92 ± 0.02 versus 0.88 ± 0.02 for creatinine (P < 0.001) and 0.84 ± 0.02 versus 0.82 ± 0.03 for uric acid (P = 0.009). TSR and RR were, however, not different due to the lower inlet concentrations with post-dilution HDF. CONCLUSIONS: TSR of mid-dilution and post-dilution HDF was not different for both small water-soluble and protein-bound compounds. Both strategies in the setting as applied in this study are as adequate for the removal of these solutes.

Novel method for simultaneous determination of p-cresylsulphate and p-cresylglucuronide: clinical data and pathophysiological implications.

BACKGROUND: The uraemic retention solutes p-cresylsulphate (pCS) and p-cresylglucuronide (pCG), two conjugates of p-cresol, were never determined simultaneously. In the present paper, a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed and used to quantify both compounds in parallel in an in vivo observational study and their in vitro effect was evaluated by flow cytometry. METHODS: pCS and pCG were determined in serum. For the validation specificity, linearity, recovery, precision and the quantification limit were evaluated. In vivo, concentrations of both compounds were determined in 15 controls and 77 haemodialysis patients, as well as protein binding in the dialysed group and the reduction ratios during haemodiafiltration. In addition, the in vitro effect of the solutes on leucocyte free radical production at measured concentrations was assessed. RESULTS: A fast and accurate HPLC method was developed to simultaneously quantify pCS and pCG. Both conjugates are retained in uraemia with a substantially higher total serum pCS in comparison to pCG (31.4 ± 15.8 versus 7.3 ± 6.5 mg/L) but also a substantial difference in protein binding (92.4 ± 3.0 versus 8.3 ± 4.4%) and in reduction ratio during post-dilution haemodiafiltration (37.4 ± 7.1 versus 78.6 ± 6.4%). pCG per se has no effect on leucocyte oxidative burst activity, whereas in combination with pCS, a synergistic activating effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Serum concentrations of pCS and pCG are elevated in uraemia. Both conjugates show a different protein binding, resulting in a different dialytic behaviour. Biologically, both conjugates are synergistic in activating leucocytes.

Comparison of removal capacity of two consecutive generations of high-flux dialysers during different treatment modalities.

BACKGROUND: Innovative modifications have been introduced in several types of dialyser membranes to improve adequacy and permselectivity. Which aspects of removal are modified and how this relates to different diffusive or convective strategies has, however, been insufficiently investigated. METHODS: In a prospective cross-over study, 14 chronic kidney disease (Stage 5D) patients were dialysed with a second-generation high-flux dialyser (Polynephron) in comparison to a first-generation type (DIAPES-HF800). Both dialysers were assessed in haemodialysis, in online pre-dilution and in post-dilution haemodiafiltration. Reduction ratio (RR, %) of small water-soluble compounds (urea and uric acid), low-molecular weight proteins (LMWPs) (ß(2)-microglobulin, cystatin C, myoglobin and retinol-binding protein) and protein-bound solutes (hippuric acid, indole acetic acid, indoxylsulphate and p-cresylsulphate) was assessed, together with albumin losses into the dialysate. RESULTS: Comparing the two types of membranes, the second-generation dialyser demonstrated a higher RR for LMWPs, whilst at the same time exhibiting lower albumin losses but only during post-dilution haemodiafiltration. No differences in RR were detected for both the small water-soluble and the protein-bound compounds. Comparing dialysis strategies, convection removed the same amount of solute or more as compared to diffusion. CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation membrane resulted in a higher removal of LMWPs compared to the first-generation membrane, but for the other solutes, differences were less prominent. Convection was superior in removal of a broad range of uraemic retention solutes especially with the first-generation membrane.

Prospective evaluation of the change of predialysis protein-bound uremic solute concentration with postdilution online hemodiafiltration.

Although protein-bound uremic compounds have been related to outcome in observational studies, few current dialysis strategies provide more removal of those compounds than standard hemodialysis. We evaluated the evolution of protein-bound uremic solutes after a switch from high-flux hemodialysis to postdilution hemodiafiltration (n = 13). We compared predialysis solute concentration at 4, 5, and 9 weeks versus baseline for several protein-bound compounds and water-soluble solutes, as well as for beta(2)-microglobulin. After 9 weeks of postdilution hemodiafiltration, a significant decrease versus baseline could be detected for total concentration of protein-bound solutes: p-cresylsulfate (3.98 +/- 1.51-3.17 +/- 1.77 mg/dL, -20%, P < 0.01) and 3-carboxyl-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (0.72 +/- 0.52-0.64 +/- 0.46 mg/dL, -11%, P < 0.01). For the other protein-bound solutes, hippuric acid, indoleacetic acid, and indoxylsulfate, no change in total concentration could be detected. The concentration of the middle molecule, beta(2)-microglobulin, decreased as well after 9 weeks of postdilution hemodiafiltration (24.7 +/- 9.3-18.1 +/- 6.7 mg/L, -27%, P < 0.01). For water-soluble compounds, no significant change of concentration was found. Postdilution hemodiafiltration in comparison to high-flux hemodialysis provided significant reduction of predialysis concentration of protein-bound compounds, especially those with the highest protein binding, and of beta(2)-microglobulin, by -11 to -27% in 9 weeks.

Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: Although different on-line convective removal strategies are available, there are no studies comparing the efficiency of solute removal for the three main options [post-dilution haemodiafiltration (post-HDF), pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (pre-HDF) and pre-dilution haemofiltration (pre-HF)] in parallel. METHODS: In this study, we compared post-HDF (Polyflux 170), pre-HDF (Polyflux 170) and pre-HF (Polyflux 210) in 14 patients. Parallelism of the evaluation protocols consisted in applying the same blood flow, dialysis time and effective convection (22.9 +/- 1.7 versus 22.2 +/- 2.0 L, P = NS) in pre-HDF versus post-HDF, and the same blood flow and dialysis time while comparing pre-HDF and pre-HF (1:1 dilution). With pre-HF, ultrafiltration was maximized and resulted in an effective convective volume of 28.5 L. We studied water-soluble compounds (urea, creatinine, uric acid), protein-bound compounds (hippuric acid, indole acetic acid, indoxylsulfate and p-cresylsulfate) and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)M). RESULTS: Post-HDF was superior to pre-HDF for water-soluble compounds and beta(2)M, whereas there was no difference for protein-bound compounds. Pre-HDF was superior to pre-HF for water-soluble compounds and protein-bound compounds. In contrast, removal of beta(2)M for pre-HF was higher than for pre-HDF, but it did not differ from that obtained with post-HDF. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that post-dilution is superior to pre-dilution HDF under conditions of similar convective volume, and that HDF is superior to HF in pre-dilution, with the exception of removal of beta(2)M. Overall, post-HDF is the most efficient convective strategy among those tested.

Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyser membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes.

BACKGROUND: Uraemic solutes accumulate in haemodialysis (HD) patients and interfere with physiological functions. Low-flux (LF) HD does not efficiently remove all uraemic compounds. We investigated whether large pore super-flux (SF) cellulose triacetate membranes (CTA) result in a better removal of uraemic solutes. METHODS: Eleven patients were dialysed consecutively with LF-CTA and SF-CTA during 3 weeks. Urea (UR), creatinine (CR), uric acid (UA), 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), hippuric acid (HA), pentosidine (PENT), low-molecular weight (MW) AGEs (AGEs) and albumin were determined in pre-HD, post-HD blood and in dialysate. Reduction rate (RR), dialytic clearance and mass transfer-area coefficient (KoA) were calculated. RESULTS: SF-HD resulted in a higher RR than LF-HD for IS and AGEs. Urea RR correlated with HA (r=0.59), IS (r=0.68) and IAA (r=0.67), (P<0.05) for SF. Dialytic clearance ranged from 20+/-5 to 179+/-20 ml/min for LF and from 24+/-6 to 191+/-24 ml/min for SF; being higher with SF for UA, HA, IS and IAA (SF vs LF, P<0.05). KoA was higher for most compounds with SF-HD. Albumin loss per SF session was 3.4+/-1.3 g. The retrieved amount of uraemic solutes in dialysate with LF and SF was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In conventional HD, SF-CTA was superior to LF-CTA for removal of most protein-bound compounds, especially IS. Reduction rate, dialytic clearance and KoA were higher with SF. The SF-CTA membrane is albumin-leaking; however, this property could not completely explain the amount of retrieved protein-bound compounds in dialysate.

Impact of iron sucrose therapy on leucocyte surface molecules and reactive oxygen species in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that iron increases oxidative stress and that an excess of iron contributes to cardiovascular disease and infections in haemodialysis patients. In the present study, the effects of parenterally administered iron on leucocyte surface molecule expression and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were evaluated. METHODS: Ten chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients without iron overload were studied. To each patient, four different regimens were applied: placebo; iron sucrose, either 30 or 100 mg, administered via the outflow dialyser line; and 100 mg of iron sucrose infused via the inflow dialyser line. Blood was sampled at different time points: before, during and after infusion and immediately before the next dialysis session. Levels of CD11b and CD45 expression on granulocytes and of CD11b, CD14 and CD36 on monocytes were determined using flow cytometric analysis. The generation of ROS was quantified using chemiluminescence with and without ex vivo stimulation by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). RESULTS: No significant differences among the four different treatment regimes were found, neither in chemilumescence activity nor in the expression of CD11b and CD45 on granulocytes, and of CD11b, CD14 and CD36 on monocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that parenteral infusion of iron sucrose during haemodialysis in patients who have no signs of iron overload has no significant effect on the expression of leucocyte surface molecules and does not increase production of ROS.

Dialysate partitioning in the Genius batch hemodialysis system: effect of temperature and solute concentration.

BACKGROUND: The Genius batch system contains a 75-L closed reservoir from which fresh dialysate is extracted at the top, and to which spent dialysate is returned at the bottom. In vivo studies have demonstrated that almost the entire amount of dialysate can be used before contamination of fresh with spent dialysate occurs. The question is raised whether density differences cause this separation, and what the relative contributions of temperature and solute content are. METHODS: As patient substitute, a container filled with dialysate was loaded with various amounts of urea. Temperature differences between spent and fresh dialysate were imposed by not heating the dialysate at the outlet line from the dialyzer (A), heating the outlet to obtain continuously equal temperatures at inlet and outlet (B), or to temperatures as in vivo (C). With a dialysate flow set at 300 mL/min, urea is not expected at the inlet before 250 minutes. RESULTS: With a urea concentration of 33 mg/dL, urea contamination at the dialysate inlet line occurred after 185 +/- 20 (A), 122 +/- 11 (B), and 175 +/- 12 minutes (C) of dialysis, whereas with 67 mg/dL, this happened at 219 +/- 5 (A), 162 +/- 11 (B), and 202 +/- 8 minutes (C). With 100 and 150 mg/dL, urea contamination appeared at 224 +/- 2 (A) and 204 +/- 14 minutes (B), and 227 +/- 5 (A) and 232 +/- 3 minutes (B), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both temperature differences between spent and fresh dialysate and solute content of spent dialysate contribute to dialysate partitioning in the Genius dialysis system.

Studies on dialysate mixing in the Genius single-pass batch system for hemodialysis therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Genius single-pass batch system for hemodialysis contains a closed reservoir and dialysate circuit of 75 L dialysate. The unused dialysate is withdrawn at the top of the reservoir and the spent fluid is reintroduced into the container at the bottom. Although it has been claimed that both fractions remain unmixed during the dialysis session, no direct proof of this assumption has yet been provided. In the present study, we investigated whether contamination of the unused dialysate with uremic solutes occurred and at which time point it began. Two different dialysate temperatures were compared. METHODS: Ten chronic hemodialysis patients were dialyzed twice with the Genius system, with dialysate prepared at 37 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C, respectively. The sessions lasted 270 minutes with blood/dialysate flow set at 300 mL/min. Dialysate was sampled at 5, 60, 180, 210, 225, 230, 235, 240, 255, and 270 minutes both from the inlet and outlet dialysate line and blood was sampled from the arterial line predialysis, after 4 hours, and postdialysis. All samples were tested for osmolality, urea, creatinine, p-cresol, hippuric acid, and indoxyl sulfate. RESULTS: Uremic solutes appeared in the inlet dialysate line between 3 hours 50 minutes and 4 hours 10 minutes after the start of dialysis, corresponding to 68.6 and 74.7 L spent dialysate, respectively (37 degrees C vs. 38.5 degrees C; P = NS). No difference in the amount of removed solutes and in the serum levels was observed between 37 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C. A Kt/V of 1.17 +/- 0.20 and 1.18 +/- 0.26, respectively, was reached with the 37 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C dialysate temperature (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Contamination with uremic solutes occurred at the dialysate inlet only near the end of the session when small quantities of fresh dialysate were left in the container. Differences in dialysate temperature did not result in a different separation between used and unused dialysate, or in differences in removal of toxins or Kt/V.