Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Surg ; 49(4): 736-740, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32073178

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the mechanical pull-out properties of a 2.5-mm bone anchor implanted in ex vivo femurs of toy breed dogs and to determine whether there is a difference between knotted and knotless configurations. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Eight paired harvested femurs. METHODS: Femurs were assigned to knotted or knotless configuration. Equal numbers of right and left femurs were tested. The caudolateral femoral condyle at the distal pole of the lateral fabella (F2 site) was drilled. The assigned configuration with braided suture combined with the bone anchor was implanted into the F2 site. Each configuration was positioned into a mechanical testing machine to measure yield load, load at 3-mm displacement, ultimate load, stiffness, and mode of failure at the beginning of the canine standing phase angle (150°). RESULTS: Mean ultimate load was 100.14 and 88.69 N (P = .798), mean yield load was 59.72 and 55.85 N (P = .708), load at 3-mm displacement was 46.72 and 43.33 N (P = .656), and stiffness was calculated to be 43.06 and 47.09 N/mm (P = .548) for knotted and knotless configurations, respectively. Mode of failure occurred primarily by anchor pull-out. CONCLUSION: The bone anchor withstood deformation at the estimated forces applied on the native cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) of toy breed dogs in both configurations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This bone anchor may constitute a useful alternative for stabilization of the CCL deficient stifle in toy breed dogs. However, before it can be recommended for widespread use in dogs, closely monitored clinical trials must be conducted to assess outcome and complications associated with this implant.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/veterinary , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Suture Anchors/veterinary , Animals , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Dogs , Stifle/surgery
2.
J Feline Med Surg ; 22(4): 399-403, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30912694

ABSTRACT

CASE SERIES SUMMARY: Medical records were reviewed for cats that underwent a perineal urethrostomy performed in dorsal recumbency for the treatment of urethral obstruction. Information, including signalment, reason for presentation, number of previous obstructions, surgery time, and perioperative and postoperative complications, were collected through a review of medical records and owner follow-up. The objective was to evaluate short- and long-term complications in cats that underwent perineal urethrostomy performed in dorsal recumbency for treatment of urethral obstruction. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: No major or life-threatening complications, such as urethral stricture, re-obstruction, euthanasia due to lower urinary signs or chronic urinary tract infection, were reported. Short-term complications were limited to dysuria in 2/12 (16.7%) cats. Long-term follow-up was available for nine cats. The most common long-term complication seen in this population of cats was a single recurrence of urinary tract infection in 3/9 (33.3%) cats that resolved after a short course of empirical antibiotic therapy. Performing perineal urethrostomy in dorsal recumbency is safe and may have advantages to ventral recumbency due to improved visualization, allowing for more efficient dissection and improved accuracy in tissue apposition during closure. We believe this has been a major contributor to our reported reduced major postoperative complication rate.


Subject(s)
Patient Positioning , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Urethral Obstruction , Urologic Surgical Procedures , Animals , Cats , Follow-Up Studies , Patient Positioning/adverse effects , Patient Positioning/veterinary , Urethra/surgery , Urethral Obstruction/surgery , Urethral Obstruction/veterinary , Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...