What Are the MSTS Scores and Complications Associated With the Use of Three-dimensional Printed, Custom-made Prostheses in Patients Who Had Resection of Tumors of the Hand and Foot?

BACKGROUND: There are a few good options for restoring bone defects in the hand and foot. 3D-printed implants have been used in the pelvis and elsewhere, but to our knowledge, they have not been evaluated in the hand and foot. The functional outcome, complications, and longevity of 3D-printed prostheses in small bones are not well known. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the functional outcomes of patients with hand or foot tumors who were treated with tumor resection and reconstruction with a 3D-printed custom prosthesis? (2) What complications are associated with using these prostheses? (3) What is the 5-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence of implant breakage and reoperation? METHODS: Between January 2017 and October 2020, we treated 276 patients who had tumors of the hands or feet. Of those, we considered as potentially eligible patients who might have extensive loss in their joint that could not be fixed with a bone graft, cement, or any prostheses available on the market. Based on this, 93 patients were eligible; a further 77 were excluded because they received nonoperative treatment such as chemoradiation, resection without reconstruction, reconstruction using other materials, or ray amputation; another three were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years and two had incomplete datasets, leaving 11 for analysis in this retrospective study. There were seven women and four men. The median age was 29 years (range 11 to 71 years). There were five hand tumors and six tumors of the feet. Tumor types were giant cell tumor of bone (five), chondroblastoma (two), osteosarcoma (two), neuroendocrine tumor (one), and squamous cell carcinoma (one). Margin status after resection was ≥ 1 mm. All patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months. The median follow-up time was 47 months (range 25 to 67 months). Clinical data; function according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, DASH, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores; complications; and survivorship of implants were recorded during follow-up in the clinic, or patients with complete charts and recorded data were interviewed on the telephone by our research associates, orthopaedic oncology fellows, or the surgeons who performed the surgery. The cumulative incidence of implant breakage and reoperation was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 28 of 30 (range 21 to 30). Seven of 11 patients experienced postoperative complications, primarily including hyperextension deformity and joint stiffness (three patients), joint subluxation (two), aseptic loosening (one), broken stem (one), and broken plate (one), but no infection or local recurrence occurred. Subluxations of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in two patients' hands were caused by the design of the prosthesis without a joint or stem. These prostheses were revised to a second-generation prosthesis with joint and stem, leading to improved dexterity. The cumulative incidence of implant breakage and reoperation in the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 35% (95% CI 6% to 69%) and 29% (95% CI 3% to 66%) at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that 3D implants may be an option for reconstruction after resections that leave large bone and joint defects in the hand and foot. Although the functional results generally appeared to be good to excellent, complications and reoperations were frequent; thus, we believe this approach could be considered when patients have few or no alternatives other than amputation. Future studies will need to compare this approach to bone grafting or bone cementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 to assess Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Metastasis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 (SOSGOQ2.0) is a spinal metastasis (SM)-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire that was previously reported to have good reliability and validity. There is currently no Thai version of the SOSGOQ 2.0. (TH-SOSGOQ2.0). PURPOSE: To assess the psychometric properties of the TH-SOSGOQ 2.0. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study. Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who were confirmed diagnosis of metastatic spinal disease, age 18 to 75 years, and having already undergone surgery and/or radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal metastasis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Validity and reliability of the TH-SOSGOQ 2.0 to assess QoL in Patients with SM. METHODS: Using the forward-backward translation technique, the SOSGOQ2.0 was translated into Thai language to create the TH-SOSGOQ2.0. SM patients were prospectively enrolled and evaluated for patient QoL using both the TH-SOSGOQ2.0 and the EQ-5D-5L (Thai version) at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Construct validity was assessed using multi-trait scaling analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation with EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subgroup of patients who took the TH-SOSGOQ2.0 two times one week apart. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (mean age: 57 years; 30 males, 38 females) were included. The Cronbach's alpha values for the total score, physical function, neurological function, pain, mental health, social function, and post-therapy domains were 0.87, 0.89, 0.91, 0.84, 0.82, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively. Good reliability was demonstrated (interclass correlation coefficient range: 0.70-0.84), except for the social function domain (0.60). Regarding concurrent validity, the TH-SOSGOQ2.0 domains demonstrated moderate to good correlation with the corresponding EQ-5D-5L 9 (Thai version) domains (range: -0.32 to -0.78). Physical function was the most well-correlated domain with the EQ-5D-5L (Thai version) (-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: TH-SOSGOQ2.0 demonstrated good reliability and validity for assessing QoL in Thai SM patients.

The short and midterm outcomes of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with preganglionic and postganglionic approach in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after preganglionic versus ganglionic epidural steroid injection (ESI) using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-regression was performed to compare postoperative outcomes between the two difference injection techniques. Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from Medline and Scopus up to September 24, 2016. Sixteen out of 598 studies were eligible; 3, 2, and 3 studies were included in the pooling of outcomes including effectiveness, visual analog score (VAS), and complications (nerve root, injury, dural puncture, and intraneural injection). Preganglionic ESI has a 2.38 (95% CI 1.12, 5.04) times statistically significantly higher chance of effectiveness when compared to ganglionic ESI. There were differences in pain VAS and complications in lumbar radiculopathy, but these displayed no statistical significance. This meta-analysis indicated that preganglionic ESI has a statistically significantly higher chance of effectiveness when compared to ganglionic ESI. In terms of pain score and complications, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were generally homogeneous and with little publication bias, thus should be generalizable.