Retrospective Evaluation of Implants Placed in Iliac Crest Autografts and Pristine Bone.

OBJECTIVE: Iliac crest autografts can compensate for severe mandibular atrophy before implant placement. However, the implant success in the augmented bone is not entirely predictable. Here we performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the success and related parameters of implants placed in augmented bone and pristine bone for up to 11 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 18 patients where 72 implants were placed six months after iliac crest transplantation and 19 patients where 76 implants were placed in pristine bone. The primary endpoint was implant loss. Secondary endpoints were the implant success, peri-implant bone loss, and the clinical parameters related to peri-implantitis. Moreover, we evaluated the oral-health-related quality of life (OHIP). RESULTS: Within a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 2.2 and 7.6 ± 2.8 years, six but no implants were lost when placed in augmented and pristine bone, respectively. Among those implants remaining in situ, 58% and 68% were rated as implant success (p = 0.09). A total of 11% and 16% of the implants placed in the augmented and the pristine bone were identified as peri-implantitis (p = 0.08). Bone loss was similar in both groups, with a mean of 2.95 ± 1.72 mm and 2.44 ± 0.76 mm. The mean OHIP scores were 16.36 ± 13.76 and 8.78 ± 7.21 in the augmentation and the control group, respectively (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed in iliac crest autografts have a higher risk for implant loss and lower implant success rates compared to those placed in the pristine bone.

Patterns of congenitally missing teeth of non-syndromic and syndromic patients treated at a single-center over the past thirty years.

OBJECTIVES: Literature regarding congenitally-missing-teeth (CMT) is lacking especially on CMT-patterns. Thus, the aim of this study was to present an in-depth analysis of 843 patients with CMT treated at a single-center over the past thirty years. DESIGN: Age, date-of-birth-year, gender, medical- and family-history, CMT-types, -numbers, -severity, -region, -symmetry, -patterns using the tooth agenesis code (TAC), and -growth types of all clinically and radiographically diagnosed CMT-patients were collected. Age and occurrence of syndromes were used to divide CMT-patients into non-syndromic patients older than nine years (group1) and syndromic CMT-patients (group2). Groups were compared especially regarding gender and CMT-severity. RESULTS: The average CMT-number per patient was 5.5 (group1, n = 816, 59.9% female) and 15.1 (group2, n = 27, 29.6% female). There were significant less male (40.1% vs. 70.4%, respectively; P = 0.002) as well as significantly less male-oligodontia (44.8% vs. 73.9%, respectively; P = 0.009) in group1 than in group2. Group1 resulted in decreased prevalence of similar CMT-patterns with severity; the most prevalent CMT was the 2nd premolar; there were no significant differences between the right and left side, whereas more CMT affected the maxilla; the majority of patients presented with bilateral-CMT (82.8%); females were more affected by CMT but more males had severer forms; certain single CMT differed by gender, and CMT was related to first-grade-relatives. CONCLUSION: The majority of CMT-patients presented with hypodontia. Furthermore, same CMT-patterns seem more like to be present in patients with milder forms of tooth agenesis. Gender-specific association regarding CMT-number, severity groups, and single CMT were detected.

Primary implant stability in the atrophic sinus floor of human cadaver maxillae: impact of residual ridge height, bone density, and implant diameter.

OBJECTIVES: Simultaneous implant placement in conjunction with lateral or transcrestal maxillary sinus floor augmentation gives the benefit of reduction in healing times and surgical interventions. Primary implant stability, however, may be significantly reduced in resorbed residual ridges. Aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of residual bone height, bone density, and implant diameter on primary stability of implants in the atrophic sinus floor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 66 NobelActive implants were inserted in the sinus floor of fresh human cadaver maxillae: 22 narrow (3.5 mm), 22 regular (4.3 mm), and 22 wide (5.0 mm) diameter implants in residual ridges of 2-6 mm height. Presurgical computed tomographic scans were acquired to assess bone height and density. Primary implant stability was evaluated by insertion torque values (ITV), Periotest values (PTV), and Osstell implant stability quotients (ISQ). RESULTS: Correlations within outcomes (ITV, PTV, ISQ) were highly significant (P < 0.001). Radiographic bone density was found to significantly impact all three outcome measures (P < 0.001), while no influence of residual bone height and implant diameter could be revealed by multifactorial analysis. Consistent results were seen in all subgroups (including residual ridges of 5-6 mm height). CONCLUSIONS: Bone density seems to represent the major determinant of primary stability in maxillary sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement (as well as 5-6 mm short implants in the maxillary sinus floor). Preoperative bone density assessment may help to avoid stability-related complications in one-stage implant treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla.

Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study was intended to evaluate the overall deviation in a clinical treatment setting to provide for quantification of the potential impairment of treatment safety and reliability with computer-assisted, template-guided transgingival implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patient population enrolled (male/female=10/8) presented with partially dentate and edentulous maxillae and mandibles. Overall, 86 implants were placed by two experienced dental surgeons strictly following the NobelGuide™ protocol for template-guided implantation. All patients had a postoperative computed tomography (CT) with identical settings to the preoperative examination. Using the triple scan technique, pre- and postoperative CT data were merged in the Procera planning software, a newly developed procedure - initially presented in 2007 allowing measurement of the deviations at implant shoulder and apex. RESULTS: The deviations measured were an average of 0.43 mm (bucco-lingual), 0.46 mm (mesio-distal) and 0.53 mm (depth) at the level of the implant shoulder and slightly higher at the implant apex with an average of 0.7 mm (bucco-lingual), 0.63 mm (mesio-distal) and 0.52 mm (depth). The maximum deviation of 2.02 mm was encountered in the corono-apical direction. Significantly lower deviations were seen for implants in the anterior region vs. the posterior tooth region (P<0.01, 0.31 vs. 0.5 mm), and deviations were also significantly lower in the mandible than in the maxilla (P=0.04, 0.36 vs. 0.45 mm) in the mesio-distal direction. Moreover, a significant correlation between deviation and mucosal thickness was seen and a learning effect was found over the time period of performance of the surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Template-guided implantation will ensure reliable transfer of preoperative computer-assisted planning into surgical practice. With regard to the required verification of treatment reliability of an implantation system with flapless access, all maximum deviations measured in this clinical study were within the safety margins recommended by the planning software.

Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the level of information on implant dentistry in the public. A representative opinion poll on dental implants in the Austrian population was published in 2003 (Clinical Oral Implants Research 14:621-642). Seven years later, the poll was rerun to assess the up-to-date information level and evaluate recent progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One thousand adults--representative for the Austrian population--were presented with a total of 19 questionnaire items regarding the level and the sources of information about dental implants as well as the subjective and objective need for patient information. RESULTS: Compared with the survey of 2003, the subjective level of patient information about implant dentistry has significantly increased in the Austrian population. The patients' implant awareness rate was 79%. The objective level of general knowledge about dental implants was still all but satisfactory revealing unrealistic patient expectations. Three-quarters trusted their dentists for information about dental implants, while one-quarter turned to the media. The patients' wish for high-quality implant restorations was significantly higher than in 2003, yet the majority felt that only specialists should perform implant dentistry. CONCLUSIONS: This representative survey reveals that dentists are still the main source of patient information, but throws doubt on the quality of their public relations work. Dentists must improve communication strategies to provide their patients with comprehensible, legally tenable information on dental implants and bridge information gaps in the future.

Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. II: implant acceptance, patient-perceived costs and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: compared with widespread investigations on dental implant survival and biologic parameters, patient-based outcomes of implant dentistry have been neglected for years and are now becoming more popular. The aim of this representative opinion poll was to assess the up-to-date patients' mindset on dental implants and draw comparisons with the results published in 2003. MATERIAL AND METHODS: one thousand adults - representative for the Austrian population - were presented with a total of 16 questionnaire items regarding acceptance and subjectively perceived costs of dental implant treatment as well as patient satisfaction with implant-supported rehabilitation. RESULTS: the implant acceptance rate was 56%, while 23% of the interviewees decidedly rejected implant treatment (same rate as in 2003), especially those over 50 years of age. Only 5% had themselves undergone implant treatment and 22% reported to know someone fitted with implants. The estimated costs of implant treatment were significantly higher than those in 2003, and three-quarters felt that the prize was too high and that the sick fund or social security agencies should bear them. Satisfaction scores were significantly higher among interviewees wearing implant-supported rehabilitations compared with those with conventional fixed or removable dentures. CONCLUSIONS: little has changed in patients' attitude toward dental implants compared with the representative opinion poll in 2003. Neither implant acceptance nor implant prevalence in the Austrian population demonstrated upward trends. Professional public relations efforts are indicated to drop resentments and increase patient acceptance of dental implants as a treatment modality.

Radiological and clinical follow-up of machined- and anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare peri-implant bone loss and mucosal conditions around machined-surface (MS) and anodized-surface (AS) interforaminal implants in the mandible at least 30 months after placement. Fifty patients, each treated with four interforaminal screw-type implants consecutively, were included. Thirty-one patients (62%) with a total number of 124 implants (64 MS and 60 AS implants, both Brånemark type MKIII) were available for follow-up. Rotational panoramic radiographs were used for evaluating marginal bone loss. Clinically, marginal plaque index (mPI), bleeding on probing (BOP) and pocket probing depth (PPD) were evaluated. AS implants showed significantly less marginal bone loss than MS implants (-1.17+/-0.13 vs. -1.42+/-0.13 mm; P=0.03). Marginal bone loss around distal implants was less pronounced at AS implants (-1.05+/-0.14 mm) when compared with MS implants (-1.46+/-0.14 mm; P=0.05). Within the smoking group, there was less peri-implant bone loss around AS implants than around MS implants (-1.08+/-0.27 vs. -1.83+/-0.2; P=0.04). No differences between MS and AS implants were found with respect to mPI (57% vs. 67%), BOP (21% vs. 17%) and mean PPD (2.59+/-0.29 vs. 2.56+/-0.28 mm). Overall, both types of implants, in combination with bar-supported overdentures, can produce excellent long-term results in the interforaminal edentulous mandible with less peri-implant bone loss around rough implant surfaces, which had beneficial effects at distal implants and in smokers.

Clinical study of horizontal alveolar distraction with modified micro bone screws and subsequent implant placement.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of horizontal distraction osteogenesis (DO) with bone micro screws for reconstructing knife-edge alveolar crests before implant placement. Horizontal DO was performed in upper and lower alveolar crests of seven patients with resorption class IV according to Cawood and Howell. After osteotomy and a 1-week latency period, micro bone screws were reset daily for horizontal expansions by 0.5 mm. Dental implants were placed in the distracted area following a consolidation period of 12 weeks. Computer tomography was performed before DO and implant placement. Morphometric analysis showed a mean gain of 34.01 mm(2) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.55-57.48) in bone area and of 3.06 mm (95% CI: 1.81-4.31) in horizontal width, i.e. the horizontal dimension of the alveolus was approximately doubled within the first 5 mm of height. All 12 implants placed into the distracted area fulfilled the success criteria of stable osseointegration after 1 year of functional loading according to Albrektsson and colleagues. Despite the limited number of patients treated, data from the clinical study of horizontal DO with bone micro screws suggest that the generation of sufficient hard tissue in previously knife-edge alveolar crests for subsequent implant placement was possible.

Soft tissue around three different implant types after 1.5 years of functional loading without oral hygiene: a preliminary study in baboons.

The purpose of this study was to determine the peri-implant soft tissue dimension (PSD) and peri-implant bone level (BL) of dental implants with different designs and surface modifications after functional loading without oral hygiene. Three types of dental implants were placed in the posterior jaws of adult baboons, three of the same design per quadrant, and fitted with fixed partial dentures. After 1.5 years of functional loading and plaque accumulation, all implants showed severe peri-implant mucositis and comparatively high BL. A histomorphometric evaluation of the sulcus depth (SD), the dimension of the junctional epithelium (JE) and the connective tissue contact (CTC) resulted in no significant differences between the three implant designs, neither in the maxilla nor in the mandible (P>0.05). The sum of SD, JE and CTC forming the PSD was nearly the same in the maxilla (commercially pure titanium, CpTi: 3.5 mm 2.9/4.1 confidence interval (CI); titanium plasma sprayed (TPS): 3.5 mm 2.9/4.2 CI; sand blasted acid-etched (GBAE): 3.2 mm 2.7/3.9 CI) and in the mandible (CpTi: 3.2 mm 2.6/3.8 CI; TPS: 3.2 mm 2.6/3.8 CI; GBAE: 3.2 mm 2.7/3.9 CI; P>0.05). There was no difference in BL around the three implant designs (maxilla: CpTi: 0.9 mm 0.5/1.6 CI; TPS: 0.9 mm 0.5/1.5CI; GBAE: 0.9 mm 0.5/1.6 CI; mandible: CpTi: 0.8 mm 0.5/1.2 CI; TPS: 0.6 mm 0.4/0.9 CI; GBAE: 0.7 mm 0.5/1.1 CI; P>0.05). Overall, the data presented did not show any significant differences in peri-implant soft tissue conditions in baboons. Moreover, plaque accumulation and propagation of peri-implant mucositis after 1.5 years of functional loading was not influenced by implant design and surface modifications in baboons.

Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons.

The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of 'bone area' (BA) and 'bone-to-implant contact' (BIC) of dental implants with different designs and surface modifications after functional loading. Three types of dental implants with fixed partial dentures were placed in the posterior jaws of adult baboons (commercially pure titanium (CpTi) screws, grit-blasted acid-etched (GBAE) screws, and titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) cylinders), three of the same design per quadrant. After 18 months of functional loading, all implants investigated were successfully integrated in the jawbone and histologic and histomorphometric analyses were carried out. Statistical evaluation was performed with a mixed model with data given as least-square means and standard errors of the mean (SEM). Histologically, direct BIC without connective tissue interposed between implant surfaces and peri-implant bone was seen. Analysis of BA within 1 mm around implants showed significant differences between CpTi (50.5%) and TPS (39.7%) (+/-2.72 SEM; P<0.01) in the maxilla. To account for the different implant designs, absolute BIC was calculated. Significant differences were found between CpTi (23.9 mm) and TPS (15.1 mm) and between GBAE (27.2 mm) and TPS (15.1 mm) (+/-1.05 SEM; P<0.01) in the maxilla and between GBAE (26.5 mm) and TPS (19.6 mm) (+/-1.42 SEM; P<0.01) in the mandible. Overall, the data indicate that, in the maxilla, screw-shaped implants showed more absolute BIC than cylindrical implants, which had less maxillary than mandibular absolute BIC after 18 months of functional loading.

The effect of platelet-rich plasma upon implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis in the lower anterior mandibles.

Using a one-stage surgical protocol, a total of 34 Brånemark Mk-III Ti-Unite implants with a length of 13 mm and a diameter of 3.75 mm were inserted in 10 edentulous mandibles. Of these, seven patients received four and three patients two interforaminal implants. All implants were followed with repeated stability measurements by means of resonance frequency analysis at different time interval: 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 days. In quadrant III platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was instilled locally before implant placement, while no PRP was added in quadrant IV to serve as control group (split-mouth design). Results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Nonetheless, both groups (PRP+control) showed a highly significant reduction of the implant stability quotient (P<0.001) between days 0 and 4. However, no difference was noted between the two groups after day 4, it may be concluded that the instillation of PRP during implant placement in the lower anterior mandible did not add additional benefit.

Bony press-fit closure of oro-antral fistulas: a technique for pre-sinus lift repair and secondary closure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of intra-oral bone grafts for closing chronic oro-antral fistulas (OAFs), for providing a sound basis for subsequent conventional sinus lifting and for preserving the teeth adjacent to OAFs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with oro-antral fistulas of variable origin were treated with monocortical bone blocks harvested from the retromolar or interforaminal regions of the mandible. The preoperative treatment, the surgical procedure for both hard and soft tissue closure, and the postoperative management are reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Press-fit closure for repair of the bony sinus floor was sufficient in 17 patients. Four of them needed additional internal fixation. In all 21 patients adequate closure of the fistulas was obtained, although 3 patients (14.3%) developed wound dehiscences at the grafted sites, which healed by secondary intention. Meanwhile, 3 patients underwent successful sinus lifting. CONCLUSION: The use of monocortical bone grafts harvested at intra-oral donor sites is a safe and easy technique for repairing defects of the maxilla, especially OAFs in need of secondary closure. It provides a sound basis for subsequent conventional sinus lifting and preserves the teeth adjacent to OAFs.

Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years.

PURPOSE: In this retrospective study, marginal peri-implant bone height around machined and sandblasted/acid-etched interforaminal implants in the mandible was evaluated radiologically at least 3 years after functional loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients, each with 4 interforaminal screw-type implants placed between 1994 and 1998, were included in this study. Of these, 36 patients (70.6%) with a total of 144 implants (76 machined Mk II implants and 68 sandblasted/acidetched Frios implants) were available for follow-up studies. Interforaminal marginal bone loss was evaluated by extraoral rotational panoramic radiographs. In addition, predictive factors such as patient age and sex, nicotine use, implant position, implant life, and site of measurement were recorded, as well as bone loss at surgery (ie, baseline bone loss). Analysis of covariance for repeated measurements was used for statistical analysis. Between-group differences were expressed as least square means +/- standard error. RESULTS: Sandblasted/acid-etched implants showed significantly less marginal bone loss than machine-surfaced implants (2.4 +/- 0.23 mm vs 1.64 +/- 0.27 mm). Implants placed in the anterior of the arch showed significantly more peri-implant bone loss than implants placed in the posterior (P = .0001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Significantly less long-term peri-implant bone loss was observed for rough implant surfaces compared to machine-surfaced implants. However, it was also demonstrated that both types of implants, in combination with bar-supported overdentures, can produce excellent long-term results in the atrophic edentulous mandible. Mesially placed implants showed more bone resorption than distally positioned implants, independent of surface roughness.

Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible.

PURPOSE: In patients with atrophic mandibles, elevation of the floor of the mouth often prevents intraoral rectangular radiography for longitudinal follow-up studies, while extraoral techniques such as panoramic radiographs tend to produce distorted views of the interforaminal region. In this study, intraoral rectangular radiographs and panoramic radiographs were compared for their accuracy in evaluating peri-implant bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a recall program, 22 patients with 88 screw-type implants (44 MKII and 44 Frios) were followed. Interforaminal marginal bone loss was evaluated by extraoral orthopantomograms and by intraoral rectangular radiographs. In addition, pocket depth, Periotest readings, and bleeding on probing were recorded. For statistical analysis, the Spearman coefficient of correlation was used. The effects on bone loss and clinical variables were computed with a mixed model and the Bland and Altman method. RESULTS: Computed as least square means, the mean difference between panoramic radiographs (2.4 +/- 0.2 mm for MKII implants and 1.6 +/- 0.2 mm for Frios implants) and intraoral radiographs (2.6 +/- 0.2 mm and 1.4 +/- 0.2 mm, respectively) was 0.2 mm (range, 0.1 to 0.8 mm). DISCUSSION: In this study, the 2 imaging techniques were comparable clinically in terms of the precision with which they could be used to measure marginal bone loss. CONCLUSION: For highly atrophic mandibles with unfavorable imaging conditions, rotational panoramic radiographs can be a useful alternative to intraoral small-format radiographs for evaluating peri-implant bone loss.

A preliminary study of monocortical bone grafts for oroantral fistula closure.

Sinus floor elevation has become a standard procedure in patients affected by severe maxillary atrophy, before implant placement, provided that the maxillary sinus is intact and uninfected. In the case of an oroantral fistula, simple soft tissue closure may interfere with the process of elevating the Schneiderian membrane. Total regeneration of the bony sinus floor is necessary to prevent disruption of the sinus membrane. In this study, 5 patients with oroantral fistulae of different causes were treated with autogenous monocortical bone blocks harvested from the chin. Press-fit closure for bony repair of the basal maxilla was sufficient in 3 of them. Two patients needed additional internal graft fixation. In the meantime, the 3 aforementioned patients underwent a successful sinus lift procedure. The use of a monocortical bone block for the closure of an oroantral fistula is recommended before internal sinus augmentation.

Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information.

The number of dental implants inserted annually worldwide has been estimated to come close to a million. But the level of information available to patients about realistic, evidence-based treatment options by implants is often enough more than fragmentary, and what is disseminated by the media and the industry does not always reflect evidence-based empirical data. This survey of 1000 adults presented with 18 questions was designed to shed light on several points. These were (1). level of subjective patient information, (2). sources of information and prejudices, (3). future demand for implant treatment and target groups for patient information campaigns, and (4). potential misinformation, information deficits, discrepancies of information and how these come about. Of those questioned, 20% said unprompted that implants were a possibility to replace missing teeth. When prompted, 72% said that they knew about dental implants. Most of those questioned felt poorly informed about the options for replacing missing teeth and many knew less about implants than about other alternatives. The dentist was said to be the desired source of information, but 77% of those questioned reported that their dentists did not practice implant dentistry. More than 79% of those questioned did not know whether their dentist worked with implants. Forty-four percent thought that implants should only be placed by specially trained doctors. Sixty-one percent were of the opinion that dentists who provide implant dentistry were better qualified than their nonimplanting colleagues. Half of those questioned attributed implant failures to allergies and incompatibilities, the other half to poor medical care. Only 29% incriminated poor oral hygiene as a cause of implant failure. Future strategies should be geared to more professional public relations and patient information. Internationally operating qualified implant institutions could contribute much to balance discrepant information.

Effects of sinus lifting on voice quality. A prospective study and risk assessment.

A variety of potential complications associated with sinus lift surgery have been reported in the literature. However, potential alterations of voice quality following sinus elevation have so far not been mentioned or evaluated scientifically. For the majority of patients, slight changes of the voice pattern are of no importance. However, for voice professionals, whose voices have become part of their distinctive profession or trademark, minimal changes may have dramatic consequences. This specific group of patients, such as speakers, actors and singers, depend on the particular quality and timbre of their voice for their livelihood. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of sinus lifting on voice quality in the above patient group. In a collaborative interdisciplinary effort, the Departments of Oral Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, Section of Phoniatrics and Logopedics, thoroughly evaluated a series of voice parameters of four patients undergoing sinus lifting pre- and postoperatively. The parameters analyzed included pitch, dynamic range, sound pressure level, percent jitter, percent shimmer and noise-to-harmonics ratio with special emphasis on formant analysis. No changes were detected in any of the commonly evaluated parameters. These were rated subjectively by patients and their friends or relatives and objectively with instrumental tools under isolated phoniatric lab conditions. In conclusion, sinus lift surgery appears to be a safe, predictable evidence-based method for regenerating the highly atrophic posterior maxilla, which does not jeopardize the individual characteristic voice pattern of high-profile patients critically dependent on their voices for their livelihood.