Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 31(3 Suppl 77): 99-102, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24064022

ABSTRACT

An 11-year-old Turkish girl from a non-consanguineous family was suffering from joint pain, fever, hepatosplenomegaly, and respiratory insufficiency. Laboratory abnormalities were thrombocytopenia, elevated levels of serum transaminases, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein (up to 193 mg / l), a hyperferritinaemia of 8030 ng/ml, and an increased sCD25. The tentative diagnosis of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) was confirmed by the detection of a histiocytosis with haemophagocytosis in the bone marrow. Treatment with dexamethasone, cyclosporine A, and VP16 was successful. However, the diagnosis of MAS on the background of a systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis was questionable because of recurrent, spontaneously remitting fever phases of 5 to 7 days duration without an obvious infectious aetiology. A positive family history of febrile episodes in three consecutive generations raised the suspicion of a dominantly inherited disease. Genetic studies revealed a likely pathogenetically relevant E56D/p.Glu85Asp mutation in exon 3 of the TNFRSF1A gene. Alterations of the MEFV gene, in contrast, were not found. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a macrophage activation syndrome as the initial manifestation of TRAPS. Similar case reports in patients with the far more common familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) have been published already.


Subject(s)
Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases/immunology , Macrophage Activation Syndrome/immunology , Child , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , DNA Mutational Analysis , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Female , Fever , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases/complications , Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases/diagnosis , Heredity , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Macrophage Activation Syndrome/diagnosis , Macrophage Activation Syndrome/genetics , Mutation , Pedigree , Phenotype , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I/genetics , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ther Drug Monit ; 29(1): 27-39, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17304147

ABSTRACT

On-site tests based on immunoassay techniques are widely used for toxicologic screening analysis in patients with suspected poisoning. However, such assays usually have been validated using urine samples with known concentrations of the investigated substances. In the present investigation, on-site screening results were evaluated in a clinical setting. This was a retrospective study of patients with suspected poisoning from January to December 2003 in the emergency department of a tertiary urban hospital. Urine samples were analyzed using the Triage 8 panel and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A total of 111 patients were included (54 female, 57 male; average age 37.8 +/- 19.7 years). A total of 3.8% of the patients showed no symptoms, 45.2% minor, 24.0% moderate, and 26.9% serious symptoms. In 50 patients (45.0%), Triage 8 results corresponded well with GC-MS results. In 17 patients (15.3%), the Triage 8 results were confirmed by GC-MS, but additional substances were determined that could not be detected by the Triage 8 panel. A completely negative Triage 8 screening result was obtained in 23 patients (20.7%) who showed toxicologically relevant findings in GC-MS. In 21 patients (18.9%), Triage 8 results could not be confirmed by GC-MS. The analysis of the results in view of the patients' medical histories revealed that in 20 patients (18.0%), no relevant toxic substance could be detected. Additionally, 8 patients (7.2%) showed intoxication with alcohol, which could not be detected by the presently applied toxicologic screening investigations. On-site screening results in suspected poisoning were not very helpful in the present study because practically every second patient ingested substances that were not detectable by the Triage 8 device. In addition, every fifth result was not in line with GC-MS findings. On-site test findings should be interpreted very carefully, and in critical cases, a GC-MS screening should be performed.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/methods , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Immunoassay/methods , Poisoning/diagnosis , Poisoning/urine , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Patients/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Triage/classification , Triage/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL