ABSTRACT
Purpose: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) causes disability/death in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) receiving chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). There is limited epidemiological data, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with IFI treatment success in Thailand. This study aimed to identify factors associated with IFI treatment success among new HM patients receiving chemotherapy or HSCT, determine IFI incidence among HM patients receiving chemotherapy or HSCT, and the IFI incidence of a breakthrough in patients receiving primary antifungal prophylaxis, and identify antifungal drugs susceptibility. Patients and Methods: This study reviewed the charts of patients aged ≥ 15 years with newly HM who received chemotherapy or HSCT between January 2016 and June 2021 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The 2020 EORTC/MSG criteria were used to diagnose IFI. IFI treatment success factors were evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Ninety-two patients with 107 episodes of IFI met the inclusion criteria. IFI incidence on proven and probable cases among newly HM patients receiving chemotherapy or HSCT was 7%. Most infections (38.3%) occurred during the induction-phase chemotherapy. Aspergillosis (35.5%) was the commonest IFI, followed by candidiasis (11.2%), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (8.4%), mucormycosis (3.7%), and others, respectively. The 12-week IFI treatment success rate was 67.3%. It was associated with age < 60 years, absence of coinfection, and the receipt of appropriate empirical therapy on the first day of IFI diagnosis. The incidence of breakthrough IFI from proven and probable cases in patients receiving primary antifungal prophylaxis was 6.1%. Most fungal pathogen isolates were still highly susceptible to antifungal drugs. Conclusion: The IFI treatment success in patients with HM or HSCT in our study was high. Close monitoring of coinfected patients aged ≥ 60 is recommended. Appropriate antifungal drugs are essential for clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Home isolation has been proposed for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with mild symptoms to avoid hospital overcrowding. This study aimed to describe the drug-related problems (DRPs) and the pharmaceutical care of home-isolating COVID-19 patients in Thailand. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study was undertaken from July 1 to September 30, 2021, at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand. Patients who were ≥ 18 years old, were diagnosed with mild COVID-19 by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and were able to isolate at home while receiving an antiviral agent and standard symptomatic treatment were enrolled. Infectious disease pharmacists provided a telepharmacy service on days 1 and 3 after the COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients met the study criteria. Their median age was 45 years, and their most common underlying disease was hypertension (44.29%). All patients exhibited excellent anti-COVID-19 drug adherence. We identified 125 DRPs, including adverse reactions (68%), and the unnecessary use of products (62.40%). Moreover, 91 patients (46.19%) reported the use of supplements or herbs, with vitamin C being the main supplement (37.36%). Pharmacists provided 36 recommendations and received 33 questions from COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that telepharmacy is an essential service for detecting and preventing DRPs in home-isolating COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Triazole antifungal-associated skin rash is rare. Data on cross-reaction triazole antifungals remain inconclusive and poorly defined. We report successful voriconazole challenge in a patient allergic to posaconazole. CASE SUMMARY: A 38-year-old female diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia and receiving chemotherapy treatment in our institution developed a maculopapular rash after receiving oral posaconazole for invasive fungal infection prophylaxis. Other potential causes that may have attributed to this response, such as other drugs that the patient was taking and infections, were excluded. Voriconazole, another triazole antifungal, was successfully substituted for posaconazole. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This is the first case report of a patient, with a history of posaconazole allergy, successfully challenged with voriconazole.