Benmelstobart, anlotinib and chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Immunochemotherapy is the first-line standard for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Combining the regimen with anti-angiogenesis may improve efficacy. ETER701 was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart (a novel programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) with anlotinib (a multi-target anti-angiogenic small molecule) and standard chemotherapy in treatment-naive ES-SCLC. The ETER701 trial assessed two primary endpoints: Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Here the prespecified final progression-free survival and interim OS analysis is reported. Patients randomly received benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC; n = 246), placebo and anlotinib plus EC (n = 245) or double placebo plus EC ('EC alone'; n = 247), followed by matching maintenance therapy. Compared with EC alone, median OS was prolonged with benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC (19.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.61; P = 0.0002), while improvement of OS was not statistically significant with anlotinib plus EC (13.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 93.1%, 94.3% and 87.0% in the benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC, anlotinib plus EC, and EC alone groups, respectively. This study of immunochemotherapy plus multi-target anti-angiogenesis as first-line treatment achieved a median OS greater than recorded in prior randomized studies in patients with ES-SCLC. The safety profile was assessed as tolerable and manageable. Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to immunochemotherapy may represent an efficacious and safe approach to the management of ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04234607 .

The Influence of Retreated Lithium Slag with a High Content of Alkali, Sulfate and Fluoride on the Composition and the Microstructure of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete.

In this paper, the possibility of retreated lithium slag (RTLS) with a high content of alkali, sulfate and fluoride as a partial replacement for fly ash (FA) to produce autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) was investigated. The influence of the RTLS dosage on the AAC performance were examined. The composition and microstructure of hydrates as well as the microstructure of the RTLS-FA-based AAC compositions were determined by XRD, FTIR, TG-DSC and SEM. The results illustrated that the incorporation of RTLS changed the crystal structure and the microstructure of the tobermorite. With increased RTLS contents, the morphology of tobermorite was changed, and the grass-like tobermorite gradually transformed into network-like tobermorite. The newly formed tobermorite improved the mechanical performance of the AAC. Compared with the RTLS10, the content of tobermorite in the RTLS30 increased by 8.6%.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Pulmonary Infections During Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients.

Objective: To investigate the risk factors for lung infection in lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Methods: We selected 142 patients with lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy at our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021. The patients were divided into groups according to whether they had pulmonary infection during radiotherapy in our hospital, which was infected group (n=44) and the uninfected group (n=98), respectively. To observe the incidence of lung infection in lung cancer patients during radiotherapy. The distribution of pathogenic bacteria in patients with pulmonary infection was observed. Clinical data of the two groups were collected and compared. The risk factors of lung cancer patients complicated with lung infection were analyzed by binary Logistic regression. Results: All patients with lung cancer complicated with lung infection underwent relevant examination, and the results showed that they were all complicated infections, and the composition ratio of Klebsiella pneumoniae was the highest (31.82%), followed by Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and fungi, which accounted for 27.27%, 22.73%, and 18.18%, respectively. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥60 years old, smoking history ≥30 years, radiotherapy duration of combined drug regimen > 2 weeks, pathogenic bacteria combined infection, albumin content < 30 g/L were risk factors for lung cancer patients during radiotherapy. Conclusion: Age ≥60 years old, smoking history ≥30 years old, radiotherapy duration of combined drug regimen > 2 weeks, pathogenic bacteria combined infection, albumin content < 30 g/L are the risk factors for lung cancer patients during radiotherapy. Clinical prevention and intervention should be based on the aforementioned independent risk factors to decrease the incidence of lung infections, thereby enhancing patient prognosis.

Systemic therapy with or without local intervention for oligometastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESO-Shanghai 13): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of local therapy for patients with oligometastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is unclear. We aimed to assess the efficacy of local plus systemic therapy compared with systemic therapy alone in patients with oligometastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: The ESO-Shanghai 13 trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Patients (aged ≥18 years) were recruited from six hospitals in China with histological confirmation of oligometastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with a controlled primary tumour and one to four metastatic lesions. Eligible patients were randomly assigned via a computer-generated schedule in a 1:1 ratio to receive either systemic therapy alone (ie, systemic therapy only group) or combined systemic and local therapy (ie, systemic and local therapy group). The systemic therapy regimens in both groups were at the discretion of the investigator and included chemotherapy alone, anti-PD-1 antibodies alone, or chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibodies. Local therapy-radiotherapy, surgery, or thermal ablation-was delivered to all metastatic lesions for patients in the systemic and local therapy group. Randomisation was balanced dynamically on three factors: the number of disease sites, the lines of systemic therapy, and the location of the metastases. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to progression or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who had undergone random assignment and at least one of the intended therapies. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03904927. The trial is ongoing but closed to new participants. FINDINGS: 116 patients were screened for enrolment between March 5, 2019, and Sept 16, 2021, and 104 patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to the systemic and local therapy group (n=53) or the systemic therapy only group (n=51). 20 (38%) patients in the systemic plus local therapy group and 23 (45%) patients in the systemic therapy only group received anti-PD-1 antibody-based systemic therapy; three patients in the systemic and local therapy group did not receive systemic therapy. At a median follow-up of 30·5 months (IQR 24·7-37·8), median progression-free survival was 15·3 months (95% CI 10·1-20·5) in the systemic and local therapy group versus 6·4 months (5·2-7·6) in the systemic therapy only group (stratified hazard ratio 0·26 [95% CI 0·16-0·42]; stratified log rank p<0·0001). Grade 1-2 acute oesophagitis was more common in the systemic and local therapy group than in the systemic therapy only group (10 [19%] vs one [2%] patients; p=0·036). The number of patients who had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events was similar between groups (25 [47%] vs 21 [41%]; p=0·538), with the most common adverse events being leukocytopenia (17 [32%] vs 18 [35%]) and neutropenia (19 [36%] vs 20 [39%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients in the systemic and local therapy group and one patient in the systemic therapy only group. INTERPRETATION: The addition of local treatment for metastases could significantly improve progression-free survival among patients with oligometastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma being treated with systemic therapy. Our findings suggest that combining local and systemic therapy could be a treatment option for patients with oligometastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but further support from phase 3 trials is required. FUNDING: Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, National Nature Science Foundation of China, and Shanghai Municipal Health Commission. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Biosimilar QL1206 Versus Denosumab in Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Randomized Phase III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Denosumab has been approved for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors. QL1206 is the first denosumab biosimilar and needs to be compared with denosumab in a phase III trial. OBJECTIVE: This phase III trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics between QL1206 and denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was conducted in 51 centers in China. Patients aged 18-80 years, with solid tumors and bone metastases, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. This study was divided into a 13-week double-blind period, a 40-week open-label period, and a 20-week safety follow-up period. In the double-blind period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three doses of QL1206 or denosumab (120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, each). Randomization was stratified by tumor types, previous skeletal-related events, and current systemic anti-tumor therapy. In the open-label period, up to ten doses of QL1206 could be given in both groups. The primary endpoint was percentage change in urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio (uNTX/uCr) from baseline to Week 13. Equivalence margins were ± 0.135. Secondary endpoints included percentage change in uNTX/uCr at Week 25 and 53, percentage change in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at Week 13, 25, and 53, and time to on-study skeletal-related events. The safety profile was evaluated based on adverse events and immunogenicity. RESULTS: From September 2019 to January 2021, in the full analysis set, 717 patients were randomly assigned to receive QL1206 (n = 357) or denosumab (n = 360). Median percentage changes in uNTX/uCr at Week 13 in two groups were - 75.2% and - 75.8%, respectively. Least-squares mean difference in the natural log-transformed ratio of uNTX/uCr at Week 13 to baseline between the two groups was 0.012 (90% confidence interval - 0.078 to 0.103), within the equivalence margins. There were no differences in the secondary endpoints between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Adverse events, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab biosimilar QL1206 had promising efficacy, tolerable safety, and pharmacokinetics equivalent to denosumab and could benefit patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04550949, retrospectively registered on 16 September, 2020.

An updated network meta-analysis of EGFR-TKIs and combination therapy in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Objectives: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a standard care option in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. TKI-based combination treatment modes show encouraging outcomes. However, it remains unknown which is the optimal treatment as the first-line regimen for these patients on overall survival (OS). Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials and meeting abstracts that investigated EGFR-TKIs alone or in combination as front-line care for patients with NSCLC were systematically searched in relevant databases and reviewed. Fixed and random effects network meta-analysis models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate, and grade three and higher adverse events (AEs). Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were used to rank treatment effects. Results: Eighteen studies covering six treatments and involving a total of 4389 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. On OS, the top three treatment were first-generation EGFR-TKIs (1G EGFR-TKIs) plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 88.1%), osimertinib (SUCRA, 65.8%) and second-generation EGFR-TKIs (2GEGFR-TKIs) (SUCRA, 63.3%). On PFS, the top three treatments were osimertinib (SUCRA, 96.0%), 1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 67.1%), and 1G EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenesis (SUCRA, 48.2%). Two types of TKI-based combination therapy have significantly higher risk of grade three and higher AEs than TKI alone. Conclusion: 1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy and osimertinib seem to be the two better options as first-line care in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-mutation. Osimertinib caused the lowest incidence of AEs. However, TKIs-based combination therapy significantly increased AEs.

Comparison of 3 Paclitaxel-Based Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Multiple paclitaxel-based regimens are widely used in chemoradiation therapy against esophageal cancer, including regimens combining paclitaxel with fluorouracil, cisplatin, and carboplatin. However, which among these 3 regimens provides the best prognosis with minimum adverse events is still unknown. Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse events of fluorouracil, cisplatin, and carboplatin in definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial of patients with ESCC was conducted in 11 treatment centers in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years and had histologically confirmed ESCC stages IIa to IVa with no prior treatment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, and adequate organ functions. The study was conducted between July 2015 and February 2018, and the cutoff date for data analysis was August 31, 2020. Interventions: Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups combining paclitaxel treatment with fluorouracil, cisplatin, or carboplatin. Patients in the cisplatin group were treated with 2 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with monthly paclitaxel plus cisplatin. For the fluorouracil group, patients were administered 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus fluorouracil in concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of monthly paclitaxel plus fluorouracil in consolidation chemotherapy. Patients in the carboplatin group were treated with 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of monthly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in consolidation chemotherapy. All patients received radiotherapy of 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were progression-free survival and adverse events. Results: Overall, 321 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 years [59-69 years]; 248 [77.3%] men) with ESCC from 11 centers were randomized into fluorouracil, cisplatin, or carboplatin groups between July 2015 and February 2018. Over a median (IQR) follow-up time of surviving patients of 46.0 months (36.6-53.0 months), the 3-year OS rates were 57.2% in the fluorouracil group, 60.1% in the cisplatin group, and 56.5% in the carboplatin group, respectively (fluorouracil vs cisplatin: HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.71-1.60; P = .77; fluorouracil vs carboplatin: HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.40; P = .77). The cisplatin group had significantly higher incidences of acute grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (69 events [60.8%] vs 19 [17.8%] for fluorouracil and 37 [34.6%] carboplatin; P < .001), thrombocytopenia (14 events [13.1%] vs 4 [3.7%] for fluorouracil and 5 [4.7%] for carboplatin; P = .01), anemia (50 events above grade 2 [46.7%] vs 25 [23.4%] for fluorouracil and 37 [34.6%] for carboplatin; P = .35), fatigue (11 events [10.3%] vs 2 [1.9%] for fluorouracil and 1 [0.9%] carboplatin; P = .007), and vomiting (17 events above grade 2 [15.9%] vs 3 [2.8%] for fluorouracil and 5 [4.7%] for carboplatin; P < .001) than the other 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, paclitaxel plus fluorouracil did not show OS superiority over paclitaxel plus cisplatin or paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Higher rates of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxic effects were reported in the cisplatin group compared with those in the fluorouracil or carboplatin groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02459457.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Background: To evaluate locoregional failure and its impact on survival by comparing involved field irradiation (IFI) with elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent post-operative radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The enrolled patients were randomized allocated to IFI or ENI group. CTV of IFI was generated according to pre-operative primary tumor location and post-operative pathological characters and positive LNs regions. CTV of ENI was generated according to pre-operative tumor position to administer selective lymph node irradiation. Radiotherapy planning was delivered using either 3D-CRT or IMRT. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled, 28 patients in ENI group and 29 patients in IFI group. There were not statistical differences between two groups in baseline (p>0.05). The initial locoregional failure rate was 17.9 % in ENI arm and 20.7% in IFI arm respectively (p=0.085). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) were 63.2, 43.5, and 21.8 % in ENI arm versus 78.2, 60.1, and 55.1% in IFI arm (p =0.038). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 78.6, 46.9, and 23.5 % in ENI arm versus 72.9, 59.7, and 54.3 % in IFI arm (p=0.06). Acute radiation pneumonitis (p=0.005) and hematological toxicities (p =0.029) also showed statistical differences between groups, ENI arm was more than IFI arm. Conclusions: The results indicated that IFI tended to improve survival and reduce toxicities for patients with operative ESCC and did not increase locoregional failure compared to ENI. It is thus suggested that IFI for ESCC PORT is worthy of clinical recommendation and further study.

Local therapy for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized, Phase II clinical trial.

For patients with oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the efficacy of local therapy is still controversial because of patient selection and lack of adequate controls in most studies. Here the authors design the ESO-Shanghai 13 trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, Phase II trial, to assess the impact of combined local therapy and systemic therapy on progression and survival compared with systemic therapy alone for patients with four or less metastases. A total of 102 patients will be recruited over 3 years from approximately five centers and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either systemic therapy alone or systemic therapy and local therapy, such as radiation, surgery and thermal ablation. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, local control, toxicity and quality of life. Clinical trial registration: NCT03904927 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Lay abstract The ESO-Shanghai 13 trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, Phase II trial to assess the impact of combined local treatment (such as radiotherapy, surgery and thermal ablation) and chemical drugs for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with four or less metastases and controlled esophageal lesion will be enrolled. The authors will recruit a total of 102 patients over 3 years from approximately five centers. All patients will be randomized and receive either chemical drugs alone or chemical drugs plus local treatment with the same probability. Patients will then be observed after treatment until disease progression or death or the end of the trial. Patients will need to report their symptoms and physical status and fill out quality of life scales during the treatment and follow-up period.

Carbon Ion Therapy Inhibits Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Metastasis by Upregulating STAT3 Through the JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway.

Radiation therapy is an important component of the comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer. However, conventional radiation resistance is one of the main reasons for treatment failure. The superiority of heavy ion radiation in physics and biology has been increasingly highlighted in radiation therapy research. The Janus Kinase 2/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (JAK2/STAT3) pathway plays an important role in the occurrence, development and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and is related to the development of resistance to ionizing radiation in ESCC. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between carbon ion inhibition of the proliferation and metastasis of esophageal carcinoma cells and the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. The results demonstrated that carbon ion beams significantly reduced cell viability and stimulated apoptosis in human ESCC cells in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, carbon ion beams induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest in ESCC cells and inhibited tumor metastasis in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, poorly differentiated KYSE150 cells were more sensitive to the same carbon ion beam dose than moderately differentiated ECA109 cells. Carbon ion beam exposure regulated the relative expression of metastasis-related molecules at the transcriptional and translational levels in ESCC cells. Carbon ion beams also regulated CDH1 and MMP2 downstream of the STAT3 pathway and inhibited ESCC cell metastasis, which activated the STAT3 signaling pathway. This study confirmed the inhibition of cell proliferation and the metastatic effect of carbon ion beam therapy in ESCC cells.

Late-course accelerated Hyperfractionation vs. Conventional Fraction Radiotherapy under precise technology plus Concurrent Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: comparison of efficacy and side effects.

Background: The accelerated reproliferation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after radiation contributes to conventional fraction radiotherapy (CFRT) failure. Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (LCAHFRT) can improve the long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients in China but is associated with a high rate of side effects due to the large exposure field of two-dimensional treatment and drug toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can increase the tumor dose while decreasing the normal tissue dose. Therefore, we compared the outcomes and side effects of LCAHFIMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and CFIMRT plus CT for ESCC. Methods and Materials: Between 2013 and 2016, 114 eligible patients with ESCC were recruited and randomly assigned to receive LCAHFIMRT+CT (58 patients) or CFIMRT+CT (56 patients) by a linear accelerator (6-MV X-ray) under image guidance. Two cycles of CT with cisplatin and docetaxel were also administered. Results: The complete response (CR) rates were 79.3% and 61.8% in the LCAHFIMRT+CT and CFIMRT+CT groups, respectively (P=0.041). The median duration of local control times was 31.0±1.9 months for the LCAHFIMRT+CT group and 24.0±3.3 months for the CFIMRT+CT groups,and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 86.2%, 63.8%, and 41.4% and 85.7%, 51.8%, and 32.1% for the LCAHFIMRT+CT and CFIMRT+CT groups (P=0.240), respectively. The median survival times were 34.0±1.1 months for the LCAHFIMRT+CT group and 28.0.0±3.7 months for the CFIMRT groups,and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 87.9%, 74.1%, and 44.8% and 87.5%, 60.7%, and 39.3% for the LCAHFIMRT+CT and CFIMRT+CT groups, respectively (P=0.405). The incidence of side effects was not significantly different between the two groups. Local recurrence and uncontrolled disease resulted in more deaths in the CFIMRT+CT group than in the LCAHFIMRT+CT group (58.9% vs. 39.7%) (P=0.040). Conclusion: For ESCC patients, LCAHFRT delivered by image-guided intensity-modulated techniques Plus Concurrent Chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel keeps safety and high CR rate, as well as local control and long-term survival rates.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with thoracic radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-arm trials.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical in vitro experiments demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) might have synergistic effect in combination with radiotherapy on Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the clinical trials showed inconsistence results in NSCLC patients with EGFR status unknow or mutations. This study aimed to determine if added TKIs to Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) improve primary disease response rate (RR) and survival outcomes in advanced or metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to December 2017 for eligible studies where patients received concurrent EGFR TKIs and TRT or CRT. Concerned outcomes were primary tumor RR, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (version 12.0). Random effects models were used to pool outcomes across studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine if the results would be different. RESULTS: We found 16 prospective clinical trials with mature results for meta-analyses. Twelve studies including 446 patients reported the RR and survival outcomes of TRT combined TKIs. The CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively, were 0.06 (95% CI 0.03-0.09, I = 0%), 0.44 (95% CI 0.38-0.49, I = 64.9%), 0.29 (95% CI 0.24-0.34, I = 78.4%), and 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.19, I = 84.2%). One- and 2-year OS, respectively, were 0.52 (95% CI 0.44-0.60, I = 38.8%) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.18-0.33, I = 0%). Four studies including 182 patients reported the RR and survival outcomes of CRT combined TKIs. The pooled CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively, were 0.12 (95% CI 0.02-0.22, I = 69.1%), 0.41 (95% CI 0.27-0.55, I71.6%), 0.31 (95% CI 0.16-0.46, I = 79%), and 0.14 (95% CI -0.01-0.30, I = 87.8%). Only 1 study reported the survival event rate, 1- and 2-year OS, respectively, were 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.94) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.54-0.81). There were not severe adverse events (SAEs) reported either TRT combined TKIs or CRT combined TKIs. CONCLUSION: There is evidence, albeit of low quality, that added the TKIs to TRT or CRT may improve RR and survival outcomes in patients with EGFR mutant status unknown advanced or metastatic NSCLC relative to other studies of TKIs alone, TRT alone or CRT.

Comparison of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin (TP), carboplatin (TC) or fluorouracil (TF) concurrent with radiotherapy for patients with local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a three-arm phase III randomized trial (ESO-Shanghai 2).

INTRODUCTION: Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard therapy for patients with local advanced oesophageal carcinoma unsuitable for surgery. Paclitaxel is an active agent against oesophageal cancer and it has been proved as a potent radiation sensitiser. There have been multiple studies evaluating paclitaxel-based chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer, of which the results are inspiring. However, which regimen, among cisplatin (TP), carboplatin (TC) or fluorouracil (TF) in combination with paclitaxel concurrent with radiotherapy, provides best prognosis with minimum adverse events is still unknown and very few studies focus on this field. The purpose of this study is to confirm the priority of TF to TP or TF to TC concurrent with radiotherapy in terms of overall survival and propose a feasible and effective plan for patients with local advanced oesophageal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ESO-Shanghai 2 is a three-arm, multicenter, open-labelled, randomised phase III clinical trial. The study was initiated in July 2015 and the duration of inclusion is expected to be 4 years. The study compares two pairs of regimen: TF versus TP and TF versus TC concurrent with definitive radiotherapy for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Patients with histologically confirmed OSCC (clinical stage II, III or IVa based on the sixth Union for International Cancer Control-tumour, node, metastasis classification) and without any prior treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery against oesophageal cancer will be eligible. A total of 321 patients will be randomised and allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to the three treatment groups. Patients are stratified by lymph node status (N0, N1, M1a). The primary endpoint is overall survival and the secondary endpoint is progression-free survival and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre Institutional Review Board. Trial results will be disseminated via peer reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations. TRIAL STATUS: The trial was initiated in July 2015 and is currently recruiting patients in all of the participating institutions above. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02459457.