ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retaining partial keloid skin to make cross flaps (keloid-cross-flap surgery) is a modification of the core excision. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of superficial radiotherapy versus compression therapy after keloid-cross-flap surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, auricular keloid patients were consecutively screened from January 2019 to December 2021. They underwent keloid-cross-flap surgery and then enter either the superficial radiotherapy or the compression treatment group. The primary outcome was the one-year keloid recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included: non-completion rate of adjuvant treatment; Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores and auricular aesthetics scores, evaluated by a four-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) of non-recurring patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate potential confounding factors. RESULTS: 123 patients were included in the superficial radiotherapy group and 128 in the compression treatment group. Non-completion rate was significantly higher in the compression treatment group (17.97 %), while the loss rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, 13 patients (13.54 %) relapsed in superficial radiotherapy group, while 22 patients (25.58 %) in compression group (p < 0.05). After PSM, 59 patients in each group were analyzed, and the recurrence rate was lower in the superficial radiotherapy group (13.56 %). Of relapse-free patients, no significant difference was found in PSAS scores, OSAS scores or aesthetic scores between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Keloid-cross-flap surgery could provide favorable morphologic repair of the auricular keloid, and postoperative superficial radiotherapy shows higher compliance and lower recurrence rate comparing to compression treatment.