Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurochem Int ; 59(6): 821-9, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854820

ABSTRACT

Focusing on development of novel drug candidates for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, we developed and synthesized a new compound, 2-(cyclohexylamino)-1-(4-cyclopentylpiperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpropan-1-one (amido-piperizine 1). The compound demonstrated robust neuroprotective properties after both glutamate excitotoxicity and peroxide induced oxidative stress in primary cortical cultures. Furthermore, amido-piperizine 1 was found to significantly induce neurite outgrowth in vitro which could suggest central reparative and regenerative potential of the compound. With these potential beneficial effects in CNS, the ability of the amido-piperizine 1 to penetrate the blood-brain barrier was tested using MDR1-MDCK cells. Amido-piperizine 1 was found not to be a P-gp substrate and to have a high blood-brain barrier penetration potential, indicating excellent availability to the CNS. Moreover, amido-piperizine 1 had a fast metabolic clearance rate in vitro, suggesting that parenteral in vivo administration seems preferable. As an attempt to elucidate a possible mechanism of action, we found that amido-piperizine 1 bound in nano-molar range to the sigma-1 receptor, which could explain the observed neuroprotective and neurotrophic properties, and with a 100-fold lower affinity to the sigma-2 receptor. These results propose that amido-piperizine 1 may hold promise as a drug candidate for the treatment of stroke/traumatic brain injury or other neurodegenerative diseases.


Subject(s)
Cyclohexylamines/administration & dosage , Nerve Growth Factors/administration & dosage , Neurites/drug effects , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Animals , CHO Cells , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Cyclohexylamines/pharmacology , Cyclohexylamines/therapeutic use , Dogs , Humans , Jurkat Cells , Male , Nerve Growth Factors/pharmacology , Nerve Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Neurites/metabolism , Neurites/pathology , Neuroprotective Agents/pharmacology , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Piperazines/pharmacology , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Primary Cell Culture , Rats , Rats, Wistar
2.
Scand J Immunol ; 58(4): 404-11, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14507305

ABSTRACT

Glucosamine (GlcN) and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) were assayed in vitro for their effects on proliferation, cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion in primary and secondary mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLCs). In addition, we studied the effect of GlcN and GlcNAc on the proliferation of purified CD4+ T cells exposed to immobilized anti-CD3 antibody. The present data show that GlcN, but not GlcNAc, inhibits CD4+ T-cell proliferation, the generation of alloreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and the secretion of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-5 (IL-5) in primary MLC. In secondary T helper-2 (Th2)-polarized MLC, GlcN, but not GlcNAc, inhibits IL-4 and IL-5 secretion, whereas no effect was found on IFN-gamma secretion in Th1-polarized MLC. Dendritic cells treated with GlcN showed a 75-80% decreased capacity for antigen cross-presentation and allostimulation. In cellular bioassays, GlcN was shown to inhibit the stimulatory activity of IL-4 and IL-2, as well as the cytotoxic activity of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). In conclusion, GlcN suppresses unprimed T-cell responses by interfering with antigen-presenting cell functions and by a direct inhibitory effect on T-cell proliferation. In addition, GlcN inhibits the secretion of cytokines in antigen-stimulated unprimed T cells and primed Th2-polarized cells.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Glucosamine/pharmacology , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , Animals , Female , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C
3.
Reprod Toxicol ; 15(1): 75-80, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11137381

ABSTRACT

The teratogenicity of EV.EXT 33, a patented Zingiber officinale extract, was examined in Wistar SPF rats according to GLP Guidelines. EV.EXT 33 was administered by oral gavage in concentrations of 100, 333, and 1000 mg/kg, to three groups of 22 pregnant female rats from days 6 to 15 of gestation. For comparison, a fourth group received the vehicle, sesame oil. Body weight and food and water intake were recorded during the treatment period. The rats were killed on day 21 of gestation and examined for standard parameters of reproductive performance. The fetuses were examined for signs of teratogenic and toxic effects.EV.EXT 33 was well tolerated. No deaths or treatment-related adverse effects were observed. Weight gain and food consumption were similar in all groups during gestation. Reproductive performance was not affected by treatment with EV.EXT 33. The examination of fetuses for external, visceral, and skeletal changes showed no embryotoxic or teratogenic effects of EV.EXT 33. Based on these results, it was concluded that EV.EXT 33, when administered to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis, caused neither maternal nor developmental toxicity at daily doses of up to 1000 mg/kg body weight.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Plants, Medicinal , Zingiber officinale , Animals , Bone and Bones/abnormalities , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Pregnancy , Rats , Rats, Wistar
4.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 73(3): 513-20, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11091007

ABSTRACT

In three different studies on rats, the effects of a patented standardised ginger extract, EV.EXT 33, on blood glucose, blood coagulation, blood pressure and heart rate were investigated. EV.EXT 33 had no significant effect on blood glucose levels at the doses used. It also had no significant effects on coagulation parameters or on Warfarin-induced changes in blood coagulation, indicating that it did not interact with Warfarin. EV.EXT 33 neither decreases systolic blood pressure nor increases heart rate in the rat. As also seen from the literature, ginger is thus pharmacologically safe regarding the investigated aspects.


Subject(s)
Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plants, Medicinal , Zingiber officinale/chemistry , Animals , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Blood Coagulation , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Drug Interactions , Heart Rate/drug effects , Male , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Warfarin/pharmacology
5.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 8(1): 9-12, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10607493

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Alternative medicine is used extensively by patients with chronic pain due to e.g., osteoarthritis. Only few of these drugs have be tested in a controlled setting and the present study was undertaken to examine the effect of ginger extract, one of the most popular herbal medications. DESIGN: Ginger extract was compared to placebo and Ibuprofen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee in a controlled, double blind, double dummy, cross-over study with a wash-out period of one week followed by three treatment periods in a randomized sequence, each of three weeks duration. Acetaminophen was used as rescue medication throughout the study. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (European Guideline for GCP). RESULTS: A ranking of efficacy of the three treatment periods: Ibuprofen>ginger extract>placebo was found for visual analogue scale of pain (Friedman test: 24.65, P< 0.00001) and the Lequesne-index (Friedman test: 20.76, P< 0.00005). In the cross-over study, no significant difference between placebo and ginger extract could be demonstrated (Siegel-Castellan test), while explorative tests of differences in the first treatment period showed a better effect of both Ibuprofen and ginger extract than placebo (Chi-square, P< 0.05). There were no serious adverse events reported during the periods with active medications. CONCLUSION: In the present study a statistically significant effect of ginger extract could only be demonstrated by explorative statistical methods in the first period of treatment before cross-over, while a significant difference was not observed in the study as a whole.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Phytotherapy , Plants, Medicinal , Zingiber officinale/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL