Soft Tissue Reconstruction of Complex Infrainguinal Wounds Following Revisionary Vascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Large, full-thickness infrainguinal wounds following revision revascularization procedures of the lower extremity are a challenging complication for reconstructive surgery. Frequently, these patients present with various comorbidities and after several previous reconstructive attempts. Therefore no straightforward soft tissue reconstruction is likely. METHODS: Patients who presented with large, complex inguinal wounds for soft tissue reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively in terms of flap choice, outcome, and complication rates. A focus was set on the reconstructive technique and a subgroup analysis was assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (11 men, 8 women) who received 19 flaps (17 pedicled, 2 free flaps) were included in this retrospective study. Average patient age was 73.3 years (range: 53-88). Ten fasciocutaneous flaps (anterolateral thigh [ALT], 52.6%) and 9 muscle flaps (47.4%) were applied. Among muscle flaps, 3 pedicled gracilis flaps, 4 pedicled rectus abdominis flaps, and 2 free latissimus dorsi flaps were used. No flap losses were observed except 1 case of limited distal flap necrosis (gracilis group). Body mass index ranged from 19 to 37, mean 26.8. Mean surgery time in all patients was 165.9 min (range: 105-373). Revision surgery due to local wound healing problems averaged 1.6 in all patients. In all cases sufficient soft tissue reconstruction was achieved and bypasses were preserved. Lengths of stay averaged 27.2 days (range: 14-59). Mortality was considerably (10.5%) due to systemic complications (one patient died due to a heart attack 4 weeks postoperatively, another patient died due to an extensive pulmonary embolism 2 weeks postoperatively). CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue reconstruction of complex inguinal wounds after revision vascular surgery is challenging and wound healing problems are expectable. In addition to the rectus abdominis flap the pedicled ALT flap is feasible in a broad variety of medium to large wounds. Free flap reconstruction is recommended for very large defects. A structured interdisciplinary approach is required for the management of complex wounds after vascular surgery to prevent and to deal with complications and perioperative morbidity.

Worldwide results from the RESTORE II on elective endografting of thoracic aneurysms and dissections.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, performance, and efficacy of the RELAY thoracic stent graft (Bolton Medical, Barcelona, Spain) in the treatment of patients who require elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair including aneurysms and dissections. METHODS: The RELAY Endovascular Registry for Thoracic Disease II (RESTORE II) is a multicenter, prospective, international cohort study involving 21 centers in 12 countries worldwide. All consecutively included patients underwent elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair with a RELAY or RELAY NBS stent graft (including off the shelf and custom-made devices) to repair thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections. Demographic, clinical, and aortic parameters were Web-based registers. Safety and efficacy data were collected for a follow-up period of 24 months. RESTORE was a precedent registry involving European sites that used RELAY first-generation devices. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were enrolled in the registry from October 2010 to September 2014 (aneurysm [n = 99]/dissection [n = 74]). Overall technical success of the intervention reached 97.1% irrespective of the etiology and geographic origin of patients. Baseline clinical heterogeneity was observed between devices concerning the etiology of the disease and certain comorbidities and/or risk factor distribution (diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris). An average of 1.36 stent graft components were used per patient, with mean intended treatment length of 197.0 ± 87.7/188.7 ± 103.1 mm and mean access site diameter of 10.3 ± 8.2/9.7 ± 1.7 mm in aneurysms/dissections, respectively. The rate of all-cause 30-day mortality was lower than in the RESTORE registry (4.0% vs 7.2%). Perioperative neurologic complications were infrequent: paraplegia/paraparesis (2.9%) and stroke (0.6%) (vs 2.0% and 1.6% in the RESTORE registry). Freedom from all-cause mortality at 2 years was 93.6%. At the final completion angiography, device-associated complications were detected in 4.6% of the patients (vs 5.3% in the RESTORE) and endoleak rate was 6.4% (type I 5.8% and type II 1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The worldwide results of the RESTORE II registry show the safety and effectiveness of RELAY and RELAY NBS stent grafts for elective endovascular thoracic aortic repair. Compared with the RESTORE registry, the device presents a lower rate of perioperative complications.

Mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).

OBJECTIVES: Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is an emergency with excessive mortality if surgery is delayed. Knowledge about independent predictors of mortality on surgically treated AADA patients is scarce. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors for death. METHODS: Between July 2006 and June 2010, 2137 surgically treated patients with AADA were enrolled in a multicentre, prospective German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection type A (GERAADA), presenting perioperative status, operative strategies, postoperative outcomes and AADA-related risk factors for death. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the influence of different parameters on 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality (16.9%) increased with age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.121] and among patients who were comatose (adjusted OR = 3.501) or those who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (adjusted OR = 3.751; all P < 0.0001). The higher the number of organs that were malperfused, the risk for death was (adjusted OR for one organ = 1.651, two organs = 2.440, three organs or more = 3.393, P < 0.0001). Mortality increased with longer operating times (total, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac ischaemia and circulatory arrest; all P < 0.02). Arterial cannulation site for extracorporeal circulation, operative techniques and arch interventions had no significant impact on 30-day mortality (all P > 0.1). No significant risk factors, but relevant increases in mortality, were determined in patients suffering from hemiparesis pre- and postoperatively (each P < 0.01), and in patients experiencing paraparesis after surgery (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: GERAADA could detect significant disease- and surgery-related risk factors for death in AADA, influencing the outcome of surgically treated AADA patients. Comatose and resuscitated patients have the poorest outcome. Cannulation sites and operative techniques did not seem to affect mortality. Short operative times are associated with better outcomes.

The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry.

BACKGROUND: Malperfusion adversely affects outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection, but reliable quantitative data are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of various forms of malperfusion on early outcome. METHODS: A total of 2,137 consecutive patients enrolled in GERAADA (German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A) who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2010, of whom 717 (33.6%) had any kind of pre-operative malperfusion, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All-cause 30-day mortality was 16.9% and varied substantially according to the number of organ systems affected by malperfusion (none, 12.6%; 1 system, 21.3%; 2 systems, 30.9%; 3 systems, 43.4%; p < 0.001). Pre-operative cerebral malperfusion, comatose state, peripheral malperfusion, visceral malperfusion, involvement of supra-aortic branches, coronary malperfusion, and renal malperfusion were all independent predictors of developing any post-operative malperfusion syndrome. When survival was considered, age, peripheral malperfusion, involvement of supra-aortic branches, coronary malperfusion, spinal malperfusion, a primary entry in the descending aorta, and pre-operative comatose state were independent predictors, again with increasing significance. CONCLUSIONS: Malperfusion remains a severe clinical condition with strong potential for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. The GERAADA registry suggests that the impact of the number of organs involved and the type of malperfusion on outcome differs substantially. Introducing an appropriate classification system, such as "complicated" and uncomplicated" acute type A aortic dissection, might help predict individual risk as well as select a surgical strategy that may quickly resolve malperfusion.

Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery†.

Ischaemic spinal cord injury (SCI) remains the Achilles heel of open and endovascular descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal repair. Neurological outcomes have improved coincidentially with the introduction of neuroprotective measures. However, SCI (paraplegia and paraparesis) remains the most devastating complication. The aim of this position paper is to provide physicians with broad information regarding spinal cord blood supply, to share strategies for shortening intraprocedural spinal cord ischaemia and to increase spinal cord tolerance to transitory ischaemia through detection of ischaemia and augmentation of spinal cord blood perfusion. This study is meant to support physicians caring for patients in need of any kind of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair in decision-making algorithms in order to understand, prevent or reverse ischaemic SCI. Information has been extracted from focused publications available in the PubMed database, which are cohort studies, experimental research reports, case reports, reviews, short series and meta-analyses. Individual chapters of this position paper were assigned and after delivery harmonized by Christian D. Etz, Ernst Weigang and Martin Czerny. Consequently, further writing assignments were distributed within the group and delivered in August 2014. The final version was submitted to the EJCTS for review in September 2014.

Current trends in cannulation and neuroprotection during surgery of the aortic arch in Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a survey across European cardiac centres to evaluate the methods used for cerebral protection during aortic surgery involving the aortic arch. METHODS: All European centres were contacted and surgeons were requested to fill out a short, comprehensive questionnaire on an internet-based platform. One-third of more than 400 contacted centres completed the survey correctly. RESULTS: The most preferred site for arterial cannulation is the subclavian-axillary, both in acute and chronic presentation. The femoral artery is still frequently used in the acute condition, while the ascending aorta is a frequent second choice in the case of chronic presentation. Bilateral antegrade brain perfusion is chosen by the majority of centres (2/3 of cases), while retrograde perfusion or circulatory arrest is very seldom used and almost exclusively in acute clinical presentation. The same pumping system of the cardio pulmonary bypass is most of the time used for selective cerebral perfusion, and the perfusate temperature is usually maintained between 22 and 26°C. One-third of the centres use lower temperatures. Perfusate flow and pressure are fairly consistent among centres in the range of 10-15 ml/kg and 60 mmHg, respectively. In 60% of cases, barbiturates are added for cerebral protection, while visceral perfusion still receives little attention. Regarding cerebral monitoring, there is a general tendency to use near-infrared spectroscopy associated with bilateral radial pressure measurement. CONCLUSIONS: These data represent a snapshot of the strategies used for cerebral protection during major aortic surgery in current practice, and may serve as a reference for standardization and refinement of different approaches.

New insights regarding the incidence, presentation and treatment options of aorto-oesophageal fistulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications.

OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence, clinical presentation, definite management and 1-year outcome in patients with aorto-oesophageal fistulation (AOF) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: International multicentre registry (European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications) between 2001 and 2011 with a total caseload of 2387 TEVAR procedures (17 centres). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with a median age of 69 years (IQR 56-75), 25% females and 9 patients (19%) following previous aortic surgery were identified. The incidence of AOF in the entire cohort after TEVAR in the study period was 1.5%. The primary underlying aortic pathology for TEVAR was atherosclerotic aneurysm formation in 53% of patients and the median time to development of AOF was 90 days (IQR 30-150). Leading clinical symptoms were fever of unknown origin in 29 (81%), haematemesis in 19 (53%) and shock in 8 (22%) patients. Diagnosis could be confirmed via computed tomography in 92% of the cases with the leading sign of a new mediastinal mass in 28 (78%) patients. A conservative approach resulted in a 100% 1-year mortality, and 1-year survival for an oesophageal stenting-only approach was 17%. Survival after isolated oesophagectomy was 43%. The highest 1-year survival rate (46%) could be achieved via an aggressive treatment including radical oesophagectomy and aortic replacement [relative risk increase 1.73 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-2.92]. The survival advantage of this aggressive treatment modality could be confirmed in bootstrap analysis (95% CI 1.11-3.33). CONCLUSIONS: The development of AOF is a rare but lethal complication after TEVAR, being associated with the need for emergency TEVAR as well as mediastinal haematoma formation. The only durable and successful approach to cure the disease is radical oesophagectomy and extensive aortic reconstruction. These findings may serve as a decision-making tool for physicians treating these complex patients.

Acute aortic dissection type A: age-related management and outcomes reported in the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) of over 2000 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between age and clinical presentation, management and surgical outcomes in a large contemporary, prospective cohort of patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA). BACKGROUND: AADA is one of the most life-threatening cardiovascular diseases, and delayed surgery or overly conservative management can result in sudden death. METHODS: The perioperative and intraoperative conditions of 2137 patients prospectively reported to the multicenter German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A were analyzed. RESULTS: Of all patients with AADA, 640 (30%) were 70 years or older and 160 patients (7%) were younger than 40 years. The probability of aortic dissection extension to the supra-aortic vessels and abdominal aorta decreased with age (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0017, respectively). In 1447 patients (69%), the aortic root was preserved and supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta was done. The probability of this procedure increased with age (P < 0.0001). The incidence of new postoperative neurological disorders was not influenced by age. The lowest probability of 30-day mortality was noted in the youngest patients (11%-14% for patients aged between 20 and 40 years) and rose progressively with age, peaking at 25% in octogenarians. CONCLUSIONS: This study reflects current results after surgical treatment of AADA in relation to patient age. Current survival rates are acceptable, even in very elderly patients. The contemporary surgical mortality rate among young patients is lower than that previously reported in the literature. The postoperative stroke incidence does not increase with age.

Strategies for endovascular aortic repair in aortobronchial and aortoesophageal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute bleeding originating from the thoracic aorta in patients with aortobronchial fistula (ABF) or aortoesophageal fistula (AEF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of nine patients (three woman) were treated from September 1995 to March 2012 by TEVAR for ABF (n = 5) and AEF (n = 4). The implants (N = 14) were introduced with fluoroscopic guidance via the aorta (n = 1), the iliac (n = 2), or femoral (n = 11) artery, respectively. RESULTS: All aortic lesions could be sealed successfully. Perioperative morbidity was 0% in the ABF group and 50% (2 of 4) in the AEF group and no procedure-related morbidity was noted except one patient who received aortofemoral reconstruction because of iliac occlusive disease. After an overall mean follow-up of 56 months, three patients of the ABF group are alive and well and two patients died of nonrelated cause. Of the AEF group, one patient is alive after 22 months, and one died from metastasized esophageal cancer after 7 months. CONCLUSION: TEVAR is a safe and reliable procedure in the management of ABF. For AEF, TEVAR provides a successful first-line treatment to seal the fistula and control bleeding. However, prognosis is limited by the esophageal lesion and by ongoing mediastinitis/sepsis.

Intraoperative neuroprotective drugs without beneficial effects? Results of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).

OBJECTIVES: Cerebral protection during acute aortic dissection Type A (AADA) surgery may be affected by perfusion strategies and ischaemic protective drugs. METHODS: We analysed the impact of intraoperative barbiturate, steroid and mannitol use and adjunctive cerebral perfusion (CP), on 30-day mortality and new postoperative mortality-corrected permanent neurological dysfunction (PNDmc) in the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and thirty-seven AADA patients were registered over a 4-year period. The overall 30-day mortality was 16.9%, and the overall rate of PNDmc was 10.0%. A total of 48% of patients received no neuroprotective drugs (control group), steroid monotherapy was used in 11.2% of patients, barbiturates in 8.4%, mannitol in 7.3% and the remainder (25.1%) received a combination of these drugs. The PNDmc rate was 10.6% in the control group and lower (7.1%) in the steroid group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.24-0.96; P = 0.049). No PNDmc reduction was observed for mannitol or barbiturates. Thirty-day mortality was 18.7% in the control group and with 8.9% lower (P = 0.003) in the mannitol group (adjusted OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.19-1.49; P = 0.295). Hypothermic circulatory arrest that exceeded 30 min was associated with an increased 30-day mortality rate (31.4%) compared with patients who received adjunctive CP >30 min during aortic arch intervention (21.4%) (P = 0.04). We were unable to demonstrate a significant protective effect of any neuroprotective drug on 30-day mortality, or PNDmc rates during prolonged (≥30 min) cerebral ischaemia. CONCLUSION: Mannitol may be associated with decreased mortality in patients undergoing AADA surgery. Steroid administration may be associated with improved neurological outcomes, but more investigation is required.

The heart as access to the aorta.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an accepted treatment option for patients with thoracic aortic pathologies regarded as unfit for open surgery. Nevertheless, a subgroup of these patients is ineligible for classic TEVAR due to the lack of access vessels. We describe the transapical TEVAR technique enabling surgeons to perform TEVAR even in these patients.

Iatrogenic acute aortic dissection type A: insight from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).

OBJECTIVES: Previous investigators have reported a grave prognosis for iatrogenic acute aortic dissection (iAADA), but such studies are limited by their small sample sizes. The purpose of the current study was to analyse the clinical characteristics, current management and surgical outcomes in a large number of iAADA patients identified through a multicentre registry. METHODS: Between July 2006 and June 2010, 50 centres participated in the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA). Of the 2137 patients included, 100 (5%) had iAADA. We compared the clinical features and 30-day outcomes of patients with iatrogenic and spontaneous acute aortic dissection type A (sAADA). RESULTS: Patients with iAADA were older than those with sAADA (67.7 ± 9.4 vs 60.1 ± 13.7 years, P < 0.0001). Preoperative cardiac tamponade and hemiplegia or hemiparesis were less frequently observed in patients with iAADA (10 vs 21%, P = 0.003; 1 vs 7%, P = 0.04). Aortic dissection extended to the supra-aortic vessels (19 vs 38%, P = 0.0005) and to iliac arteries (7 vs 25%, P = 0.0002) less frequently in iAADA patients. Those with iAADA were less likely to undergo complex aortic surgery with composite graft implantation (8 vs 20%, P = 0.02), hemiarch (38 vs 47%, P = 0.04) or total arch replacement (9 vs 17%, P = 0.07). The rate of new onset of hemiplegia or hemiparesis after surgery was also lower in iAADA patients (4 vs 10%, P = 0.05). Thirty-day mortality did not differ between the two groups (16 vs 17% for iAADA vs sAADA, P = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Early-term surgical outcomes in current iAADA patients are better than those reported previously. Immediate surgical therapy results in acceptable outcomes similar to those in naturally occurring aortic dissection.

The future of aortic surgery in Europe.

At least every ten years, each specialty should reflect upon its past, its present and its future, in order to be able to reconfirm the direction in which it is headed, to adopt suggestions from inside and outside and, consequently, to improve. As such, the aim of this manuscript is to provide the interested reader with an overview of how aortic surgery and (perhaps more accurately) aortic medicine has evolved in Europe, and its present standing; also to provide a glimpse into the future, trying to disseminate the thoughts of a group of people actively involved in the development of aortic medicine in Europe, namely the Vascular Domain of the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Targeting landing zone 0 by total arch rerouting and TEVAR: midterm results of a transcontinental registry.

BACKGROUND: Landing zone 0, defined as a proximal landing zone in the ascending aorta, remains the last frontier to be taken. Midterm results of total arch rerouting and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) extending into landing zone 0 remain to be determined. METHODS: From 2003 to 2011, 66 patients (mean age, 70 years; 68% men) presenting with pathologic conditions affecting the aortic arch (atherosclerotic aneurysms [n = 48], penetrating ulcers [n = 6], type B dissections [n = 6], type B after type A dissections [n = 5], and anastomotic aneurysm [n = 1]) were treated in 5 participating centers. Of these 66 patients, only 12% would have been deemed suitable for any kind of conventional surgical repair because of multisegmental aortic disease or comorbidities. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 9%. Retrograde type A dissection was observed in 3% of patients. The assisted type I and type III endoleak rate was 0%. Stroke was seen in 5% of patients. Permanent paraplegia was observed in 3% of those studied. Median follow-up was 25 months (8-41 months). There was 1 late type Ib endoleak, which was followed by watchful waiting. Five-year survival was 72%. Five-year aorta-related survival was 96%. No aorta-related reintervention had to be performed in the segments treated. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results of total arch rerouting and TEVAR extending into landing zone 0 are excellent in regard to aorta-related survival and freedom from aorta-related reintervention. Retrograde type A dissection, potentially related to compliance mismatch between the ascending aorta and the stent-graft, warrants further attention. Extended application of this strategy augments therapeutic options in a group of patients who are not suitable candidates for conventional therapy.