Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psychotherapy (Chic) ; 47(3): 327-344, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22402090

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the findings of a psychotherapy process study conducted within the Pennsylvania Psychological Association Practice Research Network (PPA-PRN). The investigation was the product of a long-term collaborative effort, both in terms of the study design and implementation, between experienced clinicians of various theoretical orientations and full-time psychotherapy researchers. Based on a relatively large sample of clients seen in independent practice settings, close to 1,500 therapeutic events (described by clients and therapists as being particularly helpful or hindering) were collected. These events were coded by three independent observers using a therapy content analysis system. Among the findings, both clients and therapists perceived the fostering of self-awareness as being particularly helpful. The results also point to the importance of paying careful attention to the therapeutic alliance and other significant interpersonal relationships. The merits and difficulties of conducting scientifically rigorous and clinically relevant studies in naturalistic contexts are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Helping Behavior , Mental Disorders/therapy , Professional-Patient Relations , Psychotherapy/methods , Research Design , Adult , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Observer Variation , Pennsylvania , Self Concept
2.
Psychotherapy (Chic) ; 47(3): 345-354, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22402091

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the experiences of psychotherapists who, as part of a practice research network (PRN), collaborated with researchers in designing and conducting a psychotherapy study within their own clinical practices. A qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with these psychotherapists led to the delineation of several benefits (e.g., learning information that improved their work with clients and feeling that they were contributing to research that would be useful for psychotherapists) and difficulties for them and their clients (e.g., time and effort required to integrate research protocol into routine clinical practice) that psychotherapists associated with their participation in the PRN. Also identified were a number of strategies used by psychotherapists to address obstacles that they encountered, as well as general recommendations for future PRN studies. As a whole, the experiences of these psychotherapists are likely to provide valuable lessons for the survival and growth of what is viewed by many as a promising pathway for building a stronger bridge between practice and research.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Professional-Patient Relations , Psychotherapy , Research Personnel , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL