Accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) in Disaster Settings: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) has been incorporated into the initial evaluation of trauma for decades. It is an important screening tool in the detection of intra-abdominal fluid. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the use and accuracy of FAST as an imaging tool for blunt abdominal trauma in disaster/mass casualty settings. A systematic review of literature was conducted using key words and search terms. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts to determine inclusion using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). For studies passing QUADAS, a meta-analysis was performed calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). FAST results were compared with the gold standard, which was a combination of CT scan results, operative findings, and medical records of the clinical course. Initial database screening resulted in 133 articles, of which 21 were selected for QUADAS evaluation. Five studies passed QUADAS and were selected in the final meta-analysis, with a total of 4263 patients. The sensitivity of FAST was 92.1% (87.8-95.6), specificity 98.7% (96.0-99.9), PPV 90.7% (70.0-98.0), and NPV 98.8% (98.1-99.5) for the detection of intra-abdominal injury. In our meta-analysis, FAST was both sensitive and specific in the evaluation of trauma in the disaster setting.

Lung ultrasound compared to chest X-ray for diagnosis of pediatric pneumonia: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Although a clinical diagnosis, the standard initial imaging modality for patients with concern for pediatric community acquired pneumonia (pCAP) is a chest x-ray (CXR), which has a relatively high false negative rate, exposes patients to ionizing radiation, and may not be available in resource limited settings. The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) compared to CXR for the diagnosis of pCAP. METHODS: Data were collected via a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science with dates up to August 2017. Keywords and search terms were generated for pneumonia, lung ultrasound, and pediatric population. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for inclusion. PRISMA was used for selecting appropriate studies. QUADAS was applied to these studies to assess quality for inclusion into the meta-analysis. We collected data from included studies and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of CXR and LUS for the diagnosis of pCAP. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 1510 patients were selected for data extraction. LUS had a sensitivity of 95.5% (93.6-97.1) and specificity of 95.3% (91.1-98.3). CXR had a sensitivity of 86.8% (83.3-90.0) and specificity of 98.2% (95.7-99.6). Variations between the studies included ultrasound findings diagnostic of pneumonia, study setting (inpatient vs emergency department) and inclusion of CXR in the reference standard for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis, lung ultrasound had significantly better sensitivity with similar specificity when compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pediatric community acquired pneumonia.