Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 11171, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35778458

ABSTRACT

The risk of relapse after antidepressant medication (ADM) discontinuation is high. Predictors of relapse could guide clinical decision-making, but are yet to be established. We assessed demographic and clinical variables in a longitudinal observational study before antidepressant discontinuation. State-dependent variables were re-assessed either after discontinuation or before discontinuation after a waiting period. Relapse was assessed during 6 months after discontinuation. We applied logistic general linear models in combination with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and elastic nets to avoid overfitting in order to identify predictors of relapse and estimated their generalisability using cross-validation. The final sample included 104 patients (age: 34.86 (11.1), 77% female) and 57 healthy controls (age: 34.12 (10.6), 70% female). 36% of the patients experienced a relapse. Treatment by a general practitioner increased the risk of relapse. Although within-sample statistical analyses suggested reasonable sensitivity and specificity, out-of-sample prediction of relapse was at chance level. Residual symptoms increased with discontinuation, but did not relate to relapse. Demographic and standard clinical variables appear to carry little predictive power and therefore are of limited use for patients and clinicians in guiding clinical decision-making.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Recurrence
2.
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging ; 322: 111471, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35378340

ABSTRACT

Although abnormal resting state connectivity within several brain networks has been repeatedly reported in depression, little is known about connectivity in patients with early onset chronic depression. We compared resting state connectivity in a homogenous sample of 32 unmedicated patients with early onset chronic depression and 40 healthy control participants in a seed-to-voxel-analysis. According to previous meta-analyses on resting state connectivity in depression, 12 regions implicated in default mode, limbic, frontoparietal and ventral attention networks were chosen as seeds. We also investigated associations between connectivity values and severity of depression. Patients with chronic depression exhibited stronger connectivity between precuneus and right pre-supplementary motor area than healthy control participants, possibly reflecting aberrant information processing and emotion regulation deficits in depression. Higher depression severity scores (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) were strongly and selectively associated with weaker connectivity between the precuneus and the subcallosal anterior cingulate. Our findings correspond to results obtained in studies including both episodic and chronic depression. This suggests that there may be no strong differences between subtypes of depression regarding the seeds analyzed here. To further clarify this issue, future studies should directly compare patients with different courses of depression.


Subject(s)
Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major , Brain , Depression/diagnostic imaging , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Parietal Lobe/diagnostic imaging
3.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 22346, 2020 12 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339879

ABSTRACT

The risk of relapsing into depression after stopping antidepressants is high, but no established predictors exist. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) measures may help predict relapse and identify the mechanisms by which relapses occur. rsfMRI data were acquired from healthy controls and from patients with remitted major depressive disorder on antidepressants. Patients were assessed a second time either before or after discontinuation of the antidepressant, and followed up for six months to assess relapse. A seed-based functional connectivity analysis was conducted focusing on the left subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and left posterior cingulate cortex. Seeds in the amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were explored. 44 healthy controls (age: 33.8 (10.5), 73% female) and 84 patients (age: 34.23 (10.8), 80% female) were included in the analysis. 29 patients went on to relapse and 38 remained well. The seed-based analysis showed that discontinuation resulted in an increased functional connectivity between the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex in non-relapsers. In an exploratory analysis, this functional connectivity predicted relapse risk with a balanced accuracy of 0.86. Further seed-based analyses, however, failed to reveal differences in functional connectivity between patients and controls, between relapsers and non-relapsers before discontinuation and changes due to discontinuation independent of relapse. In conclusion, changes in the connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the posterior default mode network were associated with and predictive of relapse after open-label antidepressant discontinuation. This finding requires replication in a larger dataset.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Gyrus Cinguli/diagnostic imaging , Neural Pathways/diagnostic imaging , Prefrontal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Amygdala/diagnostic imaging , Amygdala/pathology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Mapping , Depression/complications , Depression/diagnostic imaging , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/physiopathology , Female , Gyrus Cinguli/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neural Pathways/pathology , Prefrontal Cortex/pathology , Recurrence , Secondary Prevention
4.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 77(5): 513-522, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074255

ABSTRACT

Importance: Nearly 1 in 3 patients with major depressive disorder who respond to antidepressants relapse within 6 months of treatment discontinuation. No predictors of relapse exist to guide clinical decision-making in this scenario. Objectives: To establish whether the decision to invest effort for rewards represents a persistent depression process after remission, predicts relapse after remission, and is affected by antidepressant discontinuation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal randomized observational prognostic study in a Swiss and German university setting collected data from July 1, 2015, to January 31, 2019, from 66 healthy controls and 123 patients in remission from major depressive disorder in response to antidepressants prior to and after discontinuation. Study recruitment took place until January 2018. Exposure: Discontinuation of antidepressants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relapse during the 6 months after discontinuation. Choice and decision times on a task requiring participants to choose how much effort to exert for various amounts of reward and the mechanisms identified through parameters of a computational model. Results: A total of 123 patients (mean [SD] age, 34.5 [11.2] years; 94 women [76%]) and 66 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [11.0] years; 49 women [74%]) were recruited. In the main subsample, mean (SD) decision times were slower for patients (n = 74) compared with controls (n = 34) (1.77 [0.38] seconds vs 1.61 [0.37] seconds; Cohen d = 0.52; P = .02), particularly for those who later relapsed after discontinuation of antidepressants (n = 21) compared with those who did not relapse (n = 39) (1.95 [0.40] seconds vs 1.67 [0.34] seconds; Cohen d = 0.77; P < .001). This slower decision time predicted relapse (accuracy = 0.66; P = .007). Patients invested less effort than healthy controls for rewards (F1,98 = 33.970; P < .001). Computational modeling identified a mean (SD) deviation from standard drift-diffusion models that was more prominent for patients than controls (patients, 0.67 [1.56]; controls, -0.71 [1.93]; Cohen d = 0.82; P < .001). Patients also showed higher mean (SD) effort sensitivity than controls (patients, 0.31 [0.92]; controls, -0.08 [1.03]; Cohen d = 0.51; P = .05). Relapsers differed from nonrelapsers in terms of the evidence required to make a decision for the low-effort choice (mean [SD]: relapsers, 1.36 [0.35]; nonrelapsers, 1.17 [0.26]; Cohen d = 0.65; P = .02). Group differences generally did not reach significance in the smaller replication sample (27 patients and 21 controls), but decision time prediction models from the main sample generalized to the replication sample (validation accuracy = 0.71; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that the decision to invest effort was associated with prospective relapse risk after antidepressant discontinuation and may represent a persistent disease process in asymptomatic remitted major depressive disorder. Markers based on effort-related decision-making could potentially inform clinical decisions associated with antidepressant discontinuation.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Decision Making , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Models, Statistical , Physical Exertion , Reaction Time , Recurrence , Reward , Withholding Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL