Death determination by neurologic criteria-what do families understand?

PURPOSE: Currently, there is little empirical data on family understanding about brain death and death determination. The purpose of this study was to describe family members' (FMs') understanding of brain death and the process of determining death in the context of organ donation in Canadian intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured, in-depth interviews with FMs who were asked to make an organ donation decision on behalf of adult or pediatric patients with death determination by neurologic criteria (DNC) in Canadian ICUs. RESULTS: From interviews with 179 FMs, six main themes emerged: 1) state of mind, 2) communication, 3) DNC may be counterintuitive, 4) preparation for the DNC clinical assessment, 5) DNC clinical assessment, and 6) time of death. Recommendations on how clinicians can help FMs to understand and accept DNC through communication at key moments were described including preparing FMs for death determination, allowing FMs to be present, and explaining the legal time of death, combined with multimodal strategies. For many FMs, understanding of DNC unfolded over time, facilitated with repeated encounters and explanation, rather than during a single meeting. CONCLUSION: Family members' understanding of brain death and death determination represented a journey that they reported in sequential meeting with health care providers, most notably physicians. Modifiable factors to improve communication and bereavement outcomes during DNC include attention to the state of mind of the family, pacing and repeating discussions according to families' expressed understanding, and preparing and inviting families to be present for the clinical determination including apnea testing. We have provided family-generated recommendations that are pragmatic and can be easily implemented.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: À l'heure actuelle, il y a peu de données empiriques sur la compréhension des familles de la mort cérébrale et de la détermination du décès. Le but de cette étude était de décrire la compréhension des membres de la famille de la mort cérébrale et du processus de détermination du décès dans le contexte du don d'organes dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI) canadiennes. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude qualitative à l'aide d'entrevues semi-structurées et approfondies avec des membres de la famille à qui on a demandé de prendre une décision de don d'organes au nom de patients adultes ou pédiatriques dont le décès avait été déterminé selon des critères neurologiques (DCN) dans les unités de soins intensifs canadiennes. RéSULTATS: Sur la base d'entrevues avec 179 membres de la famille, six thèmes principaux ont émergé : 1) l'état d'esprit, 2) la communication, 3) le DCN peut être contre-intuitif, 4) la préparation à l'évaluation clinique pour un DCN, 5) l'évaluation clinique pour un DCN et 6) le moment du décès. Des recommandations sur la façon dont les cliniciens peuvent aider les membres de la famille à comprendre et à accepter un DCN par la communication à des moments clés ont été décrites, y compris la préparation des membres de la famille à la détermination du décès, l'autorisation de la présence des membres de la famille et l'explication de l'heure légale du décès, combinées à des stratégies multimodales. Pour de nombreux membres de la famille, la compréhension du DCN s'est développée au fil du temps et a été facilitée par des rencontres et des explications répétées plutôt qu'au cours d'une seule rencontre. CONCLUSION: La compréhension qu'ont les membres de la famille de la mort cérébrale et de la détermination du décès représente un parcours qu'ils ont décrit lors de rencontres successives avec des acteurs de soins de santé, et particulièrement avec des médecins. Les facteurs modifiables pour améliorer la communication et les issues du deuil pendant un DCN comprennent l'attention portée à l'état d'esprit de la famille, le rythme et la répétition des discussions en fonction de la compréhension exprimée par les familles, ainsi que la préparation et l'invitation des familles à être présentes pour la détermination clinique, y compris pendant le test d'apnée. Nous avons fourni des recommandations familiales qui sont pragmatiques et peuvent être facilement mises en œuvre.

The experiences of family members of deceased organ donors and suggestions to improve the donation process: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Decisions about organ donation are stressful for family members of potential organ donors. We sought to comprehensively explore the donation process from interviews conducted with family members of patients admitted to pediatric and adult intensive care units in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured, in-depth interviews with 271 family members asked to make an organ donation decision. We recruited participants from all provinces with an organ donation organization (n = 10), and analyzed themes using a modified grounded theory approach. On the basis of these interviews, suggestions were made by researchers and family members on how to improve the process of organ donation. RESULTS: We identified 3 main themes and 9 subthemes. Families need more comprehensive support around the time of donation, including having access to someone with shared experiences, support during specific moments as needed and better support during critical transitions (e.g., when the donor body goes to the operating room). The theme of better connection to recipient(s) included receiving information about the donation surgery (e.g., which organs were recovered), establishing connection with recipients (e.g., via social networks or letters) and planned encounters. Support after donation, such as updates on organ transplantation, early mental health checks and continued connection to donor organizations, could be improved. We derived 20 suggestions for improving the organ donation process, derived from interviews with family members of pediatric and adult organ donors. INTERPRETATION: We found gaps in family support during end-of-life and donation care. Feelings of abandonment, lack of support and poor-to-little follow-up provide the empirical findings needed for hospitals and organ donor organizations to provide better support to donor families.

Burnout, compassion fatigue and work-related stressors among organ donation and transplantation coordinators: A qualitative study.

AIM: Organ and Tissue Donation Coordinators (OTDCs) are healthcare professionals who manage deceased organ donation cases. This study investigated the experiences and perceptions of OTDCs, pertaining to compassion fatigue, burnout, and resilience as it relates to their daily work. METHODOLOGY: A qualitative descriptive study was undertaken using semi-structured interviews conducted with a convenience sample of OTDCs. SETTING: A Canadian Organ Donation Organization. FINDINGS: Seven out of the ten OTDCs contacted participated in this study. Coordinators all agreed that they work in a high-pressure and demanding environment and the constant exposure to work-related stress and grief has resulted in the majority of them experiencing signs and symptoms of burnout and compassion fatigue occurring throughout their career. Participants described that the emotional toll of work-related stressors and difficult cases led them to use a variety of defence strategies to protect and support their well-being. They also recognised that more strategies to help mitigate work-related stressors and to prevent burnout and compassion fatigue are needed and that management and institutions should lead the development of such interventions. CONCLUSION: Our results describe how coordinators' mental health is affected by their daily work. Further research is needed to comprehensively examine these work-related stressors and to generate additional data to support the development of interventions to mitigate burnout and compassion fatigue among OTDCs.

Expanding the Deceased Donor Pool in Manitoba Using Hepatitis C-Viremic Donors: Program Report.

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: The ongoing shortage of organs for transplant combined with Manitoba having the highest prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Canada has resulted in long wait times on the deceased donor waitlist. Therefore, the Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program has ongoing quality improvement initiatives to expand the deceased donor pool. This clinical transplant protocol describes the use of prophylactic pan-genotypic direct-acting anti-viral agents (DAA) for transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)-viremic kidneys (HCV antibody positive/nucleic acid [nucleic acid amplification testing, NAT] positive) to HCV-naïve recipients as routine standard of care. We will evaluate the provincial implementation of this protocol as a prospective observational cohort study. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Scoping literature review and key stakeholder engagement with interdisciplinary health care providers and health system leaders/decision markers. METHODS: Patients will be screened pre-transplant for eligibility and undergo a multilevel education and consent process to participate in this expanded donor program. Incident adult HCV-naïve recipients of an HCV-viremic kidney transplant will be treated prophylactically with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir with the first dose administered on call to the operation. Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir will be used for 8 weeks with viral monitoring and hepatology follow-up. Primary outcomes are sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks and the tolerability of DAA therapy. Secondary outcomes within the first year post-transplant are patient and graft survival, graft function, biopsy-proven rejection, HCV transmission to recipient (HCV NAT positive), and HCV nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance. Safety outcomes within the first year post-transplant include fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, acute liver failure, primary and secondary DAA treatment failure, HCV transmission to a recipient's partner, elevated liver enzymes ≥2-fold, abnormal international normalized ratio (INR), angioedema, anaphylaxis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. KEY FINDINGS: This program successfully advocated for and obtained hospital formulary, provincial Exceptional Drug Status (EDS), and Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) to provide prophylactic DAA therapy for this indication, and this information may be useful to other provincial transplant organizations seeking to establish an HCV-viremic kidney transplant program with prophylactic DAA drug coverage. LIMITATIONS: (1) Patient engagement was not undertaken during the program design phase, but patient-reported experience measures will be obtained for continuous quality improvement. (2) Only standard criteria donors (optimal kidney donor profile index [KDPI] ≤60) will be used. If this approach is safe and feasible, then higher KDPI donors may be included. IMPLICATIONS: The goal of this quality improvement project is to improve access to kidney transplantation for Manitobans. This program will provide prophylactic DAA therapy for HCV-viremic kidney transplant to HCV-naïve recipients as routine standard of care outside a clinical trial protocol. We anticipate this program will be a safe and effective way to expand kidney transplantation from a previously unutilized donor pool.

OBJECTIF DU PROGRAMME: La pénurie actuelle d'organes à transplanter, combinée au fait que le Manitoba est la province qui présente la plus forte prévalence d'insuffisance rénale terminale au Canada, entraîne de longs délais sur la liste d'attente d'un organe provenant d'un donneur décédé. Le programme de transplantation rénale pour les adultes du Manitoba (Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program) a mis en place des initiatives d'amélioration continue de la qualité afin d'élargir le bassin de donneurs décédés. Ce protocole clinique de transplantation décrit l'emploi, comme traitement habituel, d'agents antiviraux directs (AAD) pan-génotypiques prophylactiques pour la transplantation de reins provenant de donneurs infectés par le virus de l'hépatite C (VHC) (individus positifs pour les anticorps VHC et acides nucléiques [NAT]) à des receveurs naïfs pour VHC. La mise en œuvre provinciale de ce protocole sera évaluée en tant qu'étude de cohorte prospective et observationnelle. SOURCES: Examen de la documentation et évaluation de l'engagement des principaux intervenants avec les fournisseurs de soins de santé interdisciplinaires et les dirigeants/décideurs du système de santé. MÉTHODOLOGIE: L'admissibilité au programme sera évaluée avant la greffe. Pour participer à ce programme élargi de donneurs, les patients devront se soumettre à un processus d'information et de consentement à plusieurs niveaux. Les adultes incidents naïfs pour VHC devant recevoir un rein virémique-VHC seront traités de façon prophylactique par glécaprévir+pibrentasvir; la première dose administrée au moment de l'appel pour l'opération. Le traitement par glécaprévir+pibrentasvir sera administré pendant 8 semaines avec surveillance virale et suivi hépatologique. Les principaux résultats évalués seront une réponse virologique prolongée (RVP) à 12 semaines et la tolérance au traitement par AAD. Les résultats secondaires mesurés dans la première année suivant la greffe seront la survie du patient et du greffon; la fonction du greffon; le rejet avéré par biopsie; la transmission du VHC au receveur (positif pour VHC et NAT) et la résistance aux protéines non structurelles 5A (NS5A) du VHC. Les résultats relatifs à l'innocuité dans la première année suivant la greffe comprennent la cholestase hépatique fibrosante; l'insuffisance hépatique aiguë; l'échec primaire et secondaire du traitement par AAD; la transmission du VHC au partenaire d'un receveur; une élévation supérieure à 2 fois du taux d'enzymes hépatiques; un INR anormal; un angio-œdème; l'anaphylaxie; une cirrhose ou un carcinome hépatocellulaire. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: Le programme a recommandé et obtenu l'inscription du traitement prophylactique par AAD sur la liste de médicaments des hôpitaux pour cette indication, en plus du statut de médicament d'exception provincial et de son ajout au Programme des services de santé non assurés (SSNA). Ces renseignements pourraient être utiles à d'autres organismes provinciaux de transplantation qui cherchent à mettre en œuvre un programme de transplantation rénale virémique-VHC avec un traitement prophylactique par AAD. LIMITES: (1) La participation des patients n'a pas été entreprise pendant la phase de conception du programme, mais des mesures de l'expérience des patients seront obtenues pour l'amélioration continue de la qualité. (2) Seuls les donneurs satisfaisant aux critères standards (Kidney Donor Profile Index [KDPI] ≤ 60) seront inclus. Si cette approche est sécuritaire et faisable, des donneurs de KDPI plus élevés pourront être inclus. CONCLUSION: L'objectif de ce projet d'amélioration de la qualité est d'améliorer l'accès aux transplantations rénales pour les Manitobains. Ce programme offrira un traitement prophylactique aux AAD pour les greffes de reins virémiques-VHC à des receveurs naïfs pour VHC comme traitement de référence habituel en dehors d'un protocole d'essai clinique. Nous pensons que ce programme sera un moyen sûr et efficace d'étendre la transplantation rénale à partir d'un bassin de donneurs auparavant non utilisés.

Patient-centred and family-centred care of critically ill patients who are potential organ donors: a qualitative study protocol of family member perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: In a patient-centred and family-centred approach to organ donation, compassion is paramount. Recent guidelines have called for more research, interventions and approaches aimed at improving and supporting the families of critically ill patients. The objective of this study is to help translate patient-centred and family-centred care into practice in deceased organ donation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a national, qualitative study of family members of deceased organ donors in Canada. We will include family members who had been approached regarding an organ donation decision, including those who agreed and declined, at least 2 months and no later than 3 years after the patients' death. Data collection and analysis is ongoing and will continue until September 2020 to include approximately 250 participants. Family members will be identified and recruited from provincial organ donation organisation databases. Four experienced qualitative researchers will conduct telephone interviews in English or French with audio-recording for subsequent transcription. The research team will develop a codebook iteratively through this process using inductive methods, thus generating themes directly from the dataset. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local research ethics boards (REB) at all participating sites across Canada have approved this protocol. The main REB involved is the Ottawa Health Science Network REB. Data collection began in August 2018. Publication of results is anticipated in 2021. Study findings will help improve healthcare provider competency in caring for potential organ donors and their families and improve organ donation consent rates. Findings will also help with the development of educational materials for a competency-based curriculum for critical care residents.

Achieving the 'perfect handoff' in patient transfers: building teamwork and trust.

AIMS: To use the philosophy and methodology of Appreciative Inquiry (AI) in the investigation of unit to unit transfers to determine aspects which are working well and should be incorporated into standard practice. BACKGROUND: Handoffs can result in threats to patient safety and an atmosphere of distrust and blaming among staff can be engendered. As the majority of handoffs go well, an alternative is to build on successful handoffs. EVALUATION: The AI methodology was used to discover what was currently working well in unit to unit transfers. The data from semi-structured interviews that were conducted with staff, patients, and family informed structural process improvements. KEY ISSUES: Themes extracted from the interviews focused on the situational variables necessary for the perfect transfer, the mode and content of transfer-related communication, and important factors in communication with the patient and family. CONCLUSIONS: This project was successful in demonstrating the usefulness of AI as both a quality improvement methodology and a strategy to build trust among key stakeholders. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Giving staff members the opportunity to contribute positively to process improvements and share their ideas for innovation has the potential to highlight expertise and everyday accomplishments enhancing morale and reducing conflict.