May Women with a Negative Co-Test at First Follow-Up Visit Return to 3-Year Screening after Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia?

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme recommends that women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) only be returned to 3-year screening after receiving two consecutive negative co-tests, 6 months apart. Here we evaluate adherence to these guidelines and assessed the residual disease, using CIN3+ as the outcome. METHODS: This cross-sectional study comprised 1397 women, treated for CIN between 2014 and 2017, who had their cytology, HPV, and histology samples analyzed by a single university department of pathology. Women who had their first and second follow-up at 4-8 and 9-18 months after treatment were considered adherent to the guidelines. The follow-up ended on 31 December 2021. We used survival analysis to assess the residual and recurrent CIN3 or worse among women with one and two negative co-tests, respectively. RESULTS: 71.8% (1003/1397) of women attended the first follow-up 4-8 months after treatment, and 38.3% were considered adherent at the second follow-up. Nearly 30% of the women had incomplete follow-up at the study end. None of the 808 women who returned to 3-year screening after two negative co-tests were diagnosed with CIN3+, whereas two such cases were diagnosed among the 887 women who had normal cytology/ASCUS/LSIL and a negative HPV test at first follow-up (5-year risk of CIN3+: 0.24, 95%, CI: 0.00-0.57 per 100 woman-years). CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of women with incomplete follow-up at the end of the study period requires action. The risk of CIN3+ among women with normal cytology/ASCUS/LSIL and a negative HPV test at first follow-up is indicative of a return to 3-year screening.

Real-life evaluation of histologic scores for Ulcerative Colitis in remission.

BACKGROUND: Histological evaluation of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients has been debated ever since the first description of the disease and its role in follow-up has never been fully established. Recent evidence suggests an added benefit in accuracy when evaluating if the patient is in remission. Unfortunately, there are several different histological indices, and it is difficult to compare outcomes where different scores are applied. Histopathological evaluation is prone to subjective biases, despite the use of indices. In addition, these indices are developed by expert IBD pathologist, but applied at large, by general pathologist. Therefore, we evaluated the three most applied histological indices for UC on samples from patients in remission to compare test qualities and estimate their usefulness to identify remission by both general and GI specialized pathologist. METHOD: Mucosal biopsies from 41 UC patients in clinical and endoscopic remission were collected as part of a larger study on UC. Three pathologists blinded to the patients' clinical status evaluated them using Geboes score (GS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathological Index (RHI). We calculated the agreement between the pathologists using Inter-class correlation (ICC) and visualized it with ICC-plots and Bland-Altman plots. Association between clinical factors and histological category were analysed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The ICC value for GS, RHI and NI were 0.85, 0.73 and 0.70 respectively. The limits of agreement were ±6.1, ±4.0 and ±1.4, for GS, RHI and NI, respectively. Mayo endoscopic subgrade and UC clinical score did not show association with any histological scores. Despite clinical and endoscopic remission 7-35% of the patients displayed histological inflammation on a level classified as active disease, depending on the index and cut-off. CONCLUSION: A substantial amount of UC patients in clinical and endoscopic remission display inflammation on a histological level, but the ability to classify these patients accurately and consistently could be improved.

Quality control of cervical cytology using a 3-type HPV mRNA test increases screening program sensitivity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ in young Norwegian women-A cohort study.

Within 2021, Norway intends to complete implementation of HPV DNA-based primary screening for cervical cancer for women 34-69 years, while continue cytology-based screening for women 25-33 years. Over the recent years, the incidence of cervical cancer has increased by 30% among women younger than 40 years. In this subset of women, nearly 30% were diagnosed with a normal smear, as most recent smear, prior the cancer diagnosis. This observation demands quality control of normal smears. The aim of this study was to assess increase in program sensitivity of CIN2+ after follow-up of women with false negative Pap-smears testing positive for a 3-type (-16, -18, -45) HPV mRNA test in a cohort design over one screening interval. 521 women, aged 23-39 years, and no prior history of CIN1+ or HSIL, with an ASC-US or worse smear (ASC-US+) and 1444 women with normal screening cytology comprised the study cohorts. The positivity rate for the 3-type HPV mRNA was 1.9% (28/1444). Rescreening revealed 23 women with ASC-US, two women with LSIL, two women with ASC-H, and one woman with AGUS. If the HPV mRNA-positivity rate and histology findings from samples rescreened were applied to all women with normal cytology, an estimated increase in screening sensitivity of 16.4% (95% CI:15.3-17.5) for CIN2+ and 17.3% (95% CI:16.2-18.4) for CIN3+ were achieved. By rescreening less than 2% of women with normal cytology positive for a 3-type HPV mRNA test, we achieved a significant increase in screening program sensitivity.