Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(8): e0012351, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102440

ABSTRACT

Moxidectin is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of onchocerciasis (river-blindness) due to Onchocerca volvulus in patients aged 12 years and older. In onchocerciasis-endemic areas, mass drug administration (MDA) programs with ivermectin, with or without vector control, aim to control the disease, reduce morbidity, interrupt transmission, and more recently, achieve elimination. Moxidectin has the potential to be used in MDA programs. In countries where onchocerciasis is endemic, infants are often breastfed up to the age of 2 years, suggesting that some women are likely to be lactating during such periodic MDA programs. Quantitative analyses of non-clinical and clinical data using non-compartmental analysis and population based pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling as well as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK) were performed to determine the amount of moxidectin excreted in breast milk and subsequent exposures in the infant. The results of the analyses were similar. Concentrations of moxidectin in breast milk followed a similar pattern to those in plasma, with maximum concentrations occurring approximately 4 hours after dosing followed by a rapid decline in both breast milk and plasma. As early as two days after dosing, concentrations of moxidectin in breast milk were below the threshold for acceptable daily intake levels established by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA for secondary exposures from veterinary use, and below the WHO recommended relative infant dose (RID) safety threshold. The analyses were conducted to support prescribers and policy makers on dosing recommendations for moxidectin in lactation.


Subject(s)
Lactation , Macrolides , Humans , Macrolides/pharmacokinetics , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Female , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Milk, Human/chemistry , Infant , Adult , Filaricides/pharmacokinetics , Filaricides/administration & dosage
2.
Sci Adv ; 10(16): eadk4492, 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640243

ABSTRACT

Approximately 3.3 billion people live with the threat of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Infection can result in liver-localized hypnozoites, which when reactivated cause relapsing malaria. This work demonstrates that an enzyme-cleavable polymeric prodrug of tafenoquine addresses key requirements for a mass administration, eradication campaign: excellent subcutaneous bioavailability, complete parasite control after a single dose, improved therapeutic window compared to the parent oral drug, and low cost of goods sold (COGS) at less than $1.50 per dose. Liver targeting and subcutaneous dosing resulted in improved liver:plasma exposure profiles, with increased efficacy and reduced glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase-dependent hemotoxicity in validated preclinical models. A COGS and manufacturability analysis demonstrated global scalability, affordability, and the ability to redesign this fully synthetic polymeric prodrug specifically to increase global equity and access. Together, this polymer prodrug platform is a candidate for evaluation in human patients and shows potential for P. vivax eradication campaigns.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria, Vivax , Malaria , Humans , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Aminoquinolines/adverse effects , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria, Vivax/drug therapy , Malaria, Vivax/chemically induced , Liver
3.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol ; 12(9): 1335-1346, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37587640

ABSTRACT

As part of a collaboration between Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Certara UK and Monash University, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed for 20 antimalarials, using data obtained from standardized in vitro assays and clinical studies within the literature. The models have been applied within antimalarial drug development at MMV for more than 5 years. During this time, a strategy for their impactful use has evolved. All models are described in the supplementary material and are available to researchers. Case studies are also presented, demonstrating real-world development and clinical applications, including the assessment of the drug-drug interaction liability between combination partners or with co-administered drugs. This work emphasizes the benefit of PBPK modeling for antimalarial drug development and decision making, and presents a strategy to integrate it into the research and development process. It also provides a repository of shared information to benefit the global health research community.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Humans , Drug Development , Research Design , Universities
4.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol ; 12(5): 598-609, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840414

ABSTRACT

Although single-dose ivermectin has been widely used in mass-drug administration programs for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis for many years, ivermectin may have utility as an endectocide with mosquito-lethal effects at dosages greater and longer than those used to treat helminths. The final physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for ivermectin described here was able to capture, with reasonable accuracy, observed plasma drug concentration-time profiles and exposures of ivermectin after a single oral dose of the drug in healthy male (dose range 6-30 mg) and female subjects, in both fasted and fed states, in African patients with onchocerciasis (150 µg/kg) and in African children. The PBPK model can be used for further work on lactation, pediatric dosing (considering CYP3A4 and Pg-p ontogenies), and pregnancy, especially if nonstandard doses will be used. The key findings of our study indicate that absorption of ivermectin may be highly dependent on bile micelle-mediated solubility. The drug is highly lipophilic and permeable, and its plasma exposure appears to be associated with the body mass index of an individual. These are all factors that need to be considered when extrapolating to more complex oral formulations or alternative routes of administration. Administering lower doses over a longer period may attenuate the dependence on bile micelle-mediated solubility. With relevant inputs, the verified PBPK model developed here could be used to simulate plasma exposures following administration of ivermectin by complex generics in development.


Subject(s)
Ivermectin , Onchocerciasis , Animals , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Ivermectin/pharmacokinetics , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Micelles , Administration, Oral , Models, Biological
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(11): 1919-1927, 2023 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-acting 8-aminoquinoline tafenoquine may be a good candidate for mass drug administration if it exhibits sufficient blood-stage antimalarial activity at doses low enough to be tolerated by glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)-deficient individuals. METHODS: Healthy adults with normal levels of G6PD were inoculated with Plasmodium falciparum 3D7-infected erythrocytes on day 0. Different single oral doses of tafenoquine were administered on day 8. Parasitemia and concentrations of tafenoquine and the 5,6-orthoquinone metabolite in plasma/whole blood/urine were measured and standard safety assessments performed. Curative artemether-lumefantrine therapy was administered if parasite regrowth occurred, or on day 48 ± 2. Outcomes were parasite clearance kinetics, pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters from modelling, and dose simulations in a theoretical endemic population. RESULTS: Twelve participants were inoculated and administered 200 mg (n = 3), 300 mg (n = 4), 400 mg (n = 2), or 600 mg (n = 3) tafenoquine. The parasite clearance half-life with 400 mg or 600 mg (5.4 hours and 4.2 hours, respectively) was faster than with 200 mg or 300 mg (11.8 hours and 9.6 hours, respectively). Parasite regrowth occurred after dosing with 200 mg (3/3 participants) and 300 mg (3/4 participants) but not after 400 mg or 600 mg. Simulations using the PK/PD model predicted that 460 mg and 540 mg would clear parasitaemia by a factor of 106 and 109, respectively, in a 60-kg adult. CONCLUSIONS: Although a single dose of tafenoquine exhibits potent P. falciparum blood-stage antimalarial activity, the estimated doses to effectively clear asexual parasitemia will require prior screening to exclude G6PD deficiency. Clinical Trials Registration. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000995976).


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria, Falciparum , Adult , Humans , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Plasmodium falciparum , Healthy Volunteers , Parasitemia/drug therapy , Artemether/pharmacology , Artemether/therapeutic use , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Australia , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Malaria, Falciparum/parasitology
7.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn ; 49(3): 293-310, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35024995

ABSTRACT

Racemic praziquantel (PZQ) is the standard treatment for schistosomiasis and liver fluke infections (opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis). The development of an optimal pediatric formulation and dose selection would benefit from a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model. A popPK model was developed for R-PZQ, the active enantiomer of PZQ, in 664 subjects, 493 African children (2-15 years) infected with Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium, and 171 Lao adults (15-78 years) infected with Opisthorchis viverrini. Racemate tablets were administered as single doses of 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg in children and 30, 40 and 50 mg/kg in 129 adults, and as 3 × 25 mg/kg apart in 42 adults. Samples collected by the dried-blood-spot technique were assayed by LC-MS/MS. A two-compartment disposition model, with allometric scaling and dual first-order and transit absorption, was developed using Phoenix™ software. Inversely parallel functions of age described the apparent oral bioavailability (BA) and clearance maturation in children and ageing in adults. BA decreased slightly in children with dose increase, and by 35% in adults with multiple dosing. Crushing tablets for preschool-aged children increased the first-order absorption rate by 64%. The mean transit absorption time was 70% higher in children. A popPK model for R-PZQ integrated African children over 2 years of age with schistosomiasis and Lao adults with opisthorchiasis, and should be useful to support dose optimization in children. In vitro hepatic and intestinal metabolism data would help refining and validating the model in younger children as well as in target ethnic pediatric and adult groups.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics , Opisthorchiasis , Opisthorchis , Schistosomiasis , Adult , Animals , Anthelmintics/pharmacokinetics , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromatography, Liquid , Humans , Laos , Opisthorchiasis/drug therapy , Opisthorchis/metabolism , Praziquantel/pharmacokinetics , Praziquantel/therapeutic use , Schistosoma mansoni/metabolism , Schistosomiasis/drug therapy , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
8.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(9): 3388-3397, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534138

ABSTRACT

During a pandemic caused by a novel pathogen (NP), drug repurposing offers the potential of a rapid treatment response via a repurposed drug (RD) while more targeted treatments are developed. Five steps of model-informed drug repurposing (MIDR) are discussed: (i) utilize RD product label and in vitro NP data to determine initial proof of potential, (ii) optimize potential posology using clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) considering both efficacy and safety, (iii) link events in the viral life cycle to RD PK, (iv) link RD PK to clinical and virologic outcomes, and optimize clinical trial design, and (v) assess RD treatment effects from trials using model-based meta-analysis. Activities which fall under these five steps are categorized into three stages: what can be accomplished prior to an NP emergence (preparatory stage), during the NP pandemic (responsive stage) and once the crisis has subsided (retrospective stage). MIDR allows for extraction of a greater amount of information from emerging data and integration of disparate data into actionable insight.


Subject(s)
Drug Repositioning , Pandemics , Research Design , Retrospective Studies
9.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 109(4): 867-891, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555032

ABSTRACT

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) has a long and rich history in infectious diseases. This review describes foundational principles of translational anti-infective pharmacology, including choice of appropriate measures of exposure and pharmacodynamic (PD) measures, patient subpopulations, and drug-drug interactions. Examples are presented for state-of-the-art, empiric, mechanistic, interdisciplinary, and real-world evidence MIDD applications in the development of antibacterials (review of minimum inhibitory concentration-based models, mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/PD (PK/PD) models, PK/PD models of resistance, and immune response), antifungals, antivirals, drugs for the treatment of global health infectious diseases, and medical countermeasures. The degree of adoption of MIDD practices across the infectious diseases field is also summarized. The future application of MIDD in infectious diseases will progress along two planes; "depth" and "breadth" of MIDD methods. "MIDD depth" refers to deeper incorporation of the specific pathogen biology and intrinsic and acquired-resistance mechanisms; host factors, such as immunologic response and infection site, to enable deeper interrogation of pharmacological impact on pathogen clearance; clinical outcome and emergence of resistance from a pathogen; and patient and population perspective. In particular, improved early assessment of the emergence of resistance potential will become a greater focus in MIDD, as this is poorly mitigated by current development approaches. "MIDD breadth" refers to greater adoption of model-centered approaches to anti-infective development. Specifically, this means how various MIDD approaches and translational tools can be integrated or connected in a systematic way that supports decision making by key stakeholders (sponsors, regulators, and payers) across the entire development pathway.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Drug Development/organization & administration , Models, Biological , United States Food and Drug Administration/organization & administration , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Body Weight , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Approval/organization & administration , Drug Discovery/organization & administration , Drug Resistance, Microbial/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Microbial/physiology , Humans , Immunity/physiology , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Kidney Function Tests , Liver Function Tests , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Onchocerciasis, Ocular/drug therapy , Pediatrics , Research Design , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards
10.
Clin Transl Sci ; 14(2): 712-719, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33326705

ABSTRACT

Volunteer infection studies using the induced blood stage malaria (IBSM) model have been shown to facilitate antimalarial drug development. Such studies have traditionally been undertaken in single-dose cohorts, as many as necessary to obtain the dose-response relationship. To enhance ethical and logistic aspects of such studies, and to reduce the number of cohorts needed to establish the dose-response relationship, we undertook a retrospective in silico analysis of previously accrued data to improve study design. A pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed from initial fictive-cohort data for OZ439 (mixing the data of the three single-dose cohorts as: n = 2 on 100 mg, 2 on 200 mg, and 4 on 500 mg). A three-compartment model described OZ439 PKs. Net growth of parasites was modeled using a Gompertz function and drug-induced parasite death using a Hill function. Parameter estimates for the PK and PD models were comparable for the multidose single-cohort vs. the pooled analysis of all cohorts. Simulations based on the multidose single-cohort design described the complete data from the original IBSM study. The novel design allows for the ascertainment of the PK/PD relationship early in the study, providing a basis for rational dose selection for subsequent cohorts and studies.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Malaria/drug therapy , Models, Biological , Plasmodium/drug effects , Antimalarials/pharmacokinetics , Cohort Studies , Computer Simulation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Malaria/parasitology , Plasmodium/pathogenicity , Research Design , Retrospective Studies
11.
J Control Release ; 331: 213-227, 2021 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33378692

ABSTRACT

Primaquine and tafenoquine are the two 8-aminoquinoline (8-AQ) antimalarial drugs approved for malarial radical cure - the elimination of liver stage hypnozoites after infection with Plasmodium vivax. A single oral dose of tafenoquine leads to high efficacy against intra-hepatocyte hypnozoites after efficient first pass liver uptake and metabolism. Unfortunately, both drugs cause hemolytic anemia in G6PD-deficient humans. This toxicity prevents their mass administration without G6PD testing given the approximately 400 million G6PD deficient people across malarial endemic regions of the world. We hypothesized that liver-targeted delivery of 8-AQ prodrugs could maximize liver exposure and minimize erythrocyte exposure to increase their therapeutic window. Primaquine and tafenoquine were first synthesized as prodrug vinyl monomers with self-immolative hydrolytic linkers or cathepsin-cleavable valine-citrulline peptide linkers. RAFT polymerization was exploited to copolymerize these prodrug monomers with hepatocyte-targeting GalNAc monomers. Pharmacokinetic studies of released drugs after intravenous administration showed that the liver-to-plasma AUC ratios could be significantly improved, compared to parent drug administered orally. Single doses of the liver-targeted, enzyme-cleavable tafenoquine polymer were found to be as efficacious as an equivalent dose of the oral parent drug in the P. berghei causal prophylaxis model. They also elicited significantly milder hemotoxicity in the humanized NOD/SCID mouse model engrafted with red blood cells from G6PD deficient donors. The clinical application is envisioned as a single subcutaneous administration, and the lead tafenoquine polymer also showed excellent bioavailability and liver-to-blood ratios exceeding the IV administered polymer. The liver-targeted tafenoquine polymers warrant further development as a single-dose therapeutic via the subcutaneous route with the potential for broader patient administration without a requirement for G6PD diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria, Vivax , Malaria , Prodrugs , Aminoquinolines , Animals , Liver , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria, Vivax/drug therapy , Mice , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Polymers/therapeutic use , Primaquine , Prodrugs/therapeutic use
12.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(4): 1364-1366, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828137

ABSTRACT

As the global COVID-19 pandemic continues, unabated and clinical trials demonstrate limited effective pharmaceutical interventions, there is a pressing need to accelerate treatment evaluations. Among options for accelerated development is the evaluation of drug combinations in the absence of prior monotherapy data. This approach is appealing for a number of reasons. First, combining two or more drugs with related or complementary therapeutic effects permits a multipronged approach addressing the variable pathways of the disease. Second, if an individual component of a combination offers a therapeutic effect, then in the absence of antagonism, a trial of combination therapy should still detect individual efficacy. Third, this strategy is time saving. Rather than taking a stepwise approach to evaluating monotherapies, this strategy begins with testing all relevant therapeutic options. Finally, given the severity of the current pandemic and the absence of treatment options, the likelihood of detecting a treatment effect with combination therapy maintains scientific enthusiasm for evaluating repurposed treatments. Antiviral combination selection can be facilitated by insights regarding SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and cell cycle dynamics, supported by infectious disease and clinical pharmacology expert advice. We describe a clinical evaluation strategy using adaptive combination platform trials to rapidly test combination therapies to treat COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Epidemiologic Research Design , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Combinations , Drug Repositioning/methods , Humans , Interferon beta-1b/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 108(6): 1135-1149, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687630

ABSTRACT

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are quinoline derivatives used to treat malaria. To date, these medications are not approved for the treatment of viral infections, and there are no well-controlled, prospective, randomized clinical studies or evidence to support their use in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nevertheless, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are being studied alone or in combination with other agents to assess their effectiveness in the treatment or prophylaxis for COVID-19. The effective use of any medication involves an understanding of its pharmacokinetics, safety, and mechanism of action. This work provides basic clinical pharmacology information relevant for planning and initiating COVID-19 clinical studies with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, summarizes safety data from healthy volunteer studies, and summarizes safety data from phase II and phase II/III clinical studies in patients with uncomplicated malaria, including a phase II/III study in pediatric patients following administration of azithromycin and chloroquine in combination. In addition, this work presents data describing the proposed mechanisms of action against the severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus-2 and summarizes clinical efficacy to date.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Chloroquine/pharmacology , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacology , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Aging , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Chloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Drug Interactions , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Liver Failure/epidemiology , Malaria/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 108(5): 976-984, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32531808

ABSTRACT

We use a mechanistic lung model to demonstrate that accumulation of chloroquine (CQ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and azithromycin (AZ) in the lungs is sensitive to changes in lung pH, a parameter that can be affected in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A reduction in pH from 6.7 to 6 in the lungs, as observed in respiratory disease, led to 20-fold, 4.0-fold, and 2.7-fold increases in lung exposure of CQ, HCQ, and AZ, respectively. Simulations indicated that the relatively high concentrations of CQ and HCQ in lung tissue were sustained long after administration of the drugs had stopped. Patients with COVID-19 often present with kidney failure. Our simulations indicate that renal impairment (plus lung pH reduction) caused 30-fold, 8.0-fold, and 3.4-fold increases in lung exposures for CQ, HCQ, and AZ, respectively, with relatively small accompanying increases (20 to 30%) in systemic exposure. Although a number of different dosage regimens were assessed, the purpose of our study was not to provide recommendations for a dosing strategy, but to demonstrate the utility of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to estimate lung concentrations. This, used in conjunction with robust in vitro and clinical data, can help in the assessment of COVID-19 therapeutics going forward.


Subject(s)
Azithromycin/pharmacokinetics , Coronavirus Infections , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Lung , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Betacoronavirus/physiology , Biological Availability , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/metabolism , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Design , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Lung/drug effects , Lung/metabolism , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
15.
Trials ; 21(1): 475, 2020 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493478

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Primary Objective • To test the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (400 mg orally daily for 3 days then 200 mg orally daily for an additional 11 days, to complete 14 days) to prevent incident SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared to ascorbic acid among contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection Secondary objectives • To determine the safety and tolerability of HCQ as SARS-CoV-2 Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) in adults • To test the efficacy of HCQ (400 mg orally daily for 3 days then 200 mg orally daily for an additional 11 days, to complete 14 days) to prevent incident SARS-CoV-2 infection 2 weeks after completing therapy, compared to ascorbic acid among contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection • To test the efficacy of HCQ to shorten the duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the HCQ PEP group • To test the efficacy of HCQ to prevent incident COVID-19 TRIAL DESIGN: This is a randomized, multi-center, placebo-equivalent (ascorbic acid) controlled, blinded study of HCQ PEP for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults exposed to the virus. PARTICIPANTS: This study will enroll up to 2000 asymptomatic adults 18 to 80 years of age (inclusive) at baseline who are close contacts of persons with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 or clinically suspected COVID-19 and a pending SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. This multisite trial will be conducted at seven sites in Seattle (UW), Los Angeles (UCLA), New Orleans (Tulane), Baltimore (UMB), New York City (NYU), Syracuse (SUNY-Upstate), and Boston (BMC). Inclusion criteria Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria apply: 1.Men or women 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent2.Willing and able to provide informed consent3.Had a close contact of a person (index) with known PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or index who is currently being assessed for COVID-19 Close contact is defined as: a.Household contact (i.e., residing with the index case in the 14 days prior to index diagnosis or prolonged exposure within a residence/vehicle/enclosed space without maintaining social distance)b.Medical staff, first responders, or other care persons who cared for the index case without personal protection (mask and gloves)4.Less than 4 days since last exposure (close contact with a person with SARS-CoV-2 infection) to the index case5.Access to device and internet for Telehealth visits6.Not planning to take HCQ in addition to the study medication Exclusion criteria Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: 1.Known hypersensitivity to HCQ or other 4-aminoquinoline compounds2.Currently hospitalized3.Symptomatic with subjective fever, cough, or shortness of breath4.Current medications exclude concomitant use of HCQ5.Concomitant use of other anti-malarial treatment or chemoprophylaxis, including chloroquine, mefloquine, artemether, or lumefantrine.6.History of retinopathy of any etiology7.Psoriasis8.Porphyria9.Known bone marrow disorders with significant neutropenia (polymorphonuclear leukocytes <1500) or thrombocytopenia (<100 K)10.Concomitant use of digoxin, cyclosporin, cimetidine, amiodarone, or tamoxifen11.Known moderate or severe liver disease12.Known long QT syndrome13.Severe renal impairment14.Use of any investigational or non-registered drug or vaccine within 30 days preceding the first dose of the study drugs or planned use during the study period INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Households will be randomized 1:1 (at the level of household), with close contact participants receiving one of the following therapies: •HCQ 400 mg orally daily for 3 days then 200 mg orally daily for an additional 11 days •Placebo-like control (ascorbic acid) 500 mg orally daily for 3 days then 250 mg orally daily for 11 days MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study is the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection through day 14 among participants who are SARS-CoV-2 negative at baseline by randomization group. RANDOMISATION: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to HCQ or ascorbic acid at the level of the household (all eligible participants in 1 household will receive the same intervention). The randomization code and resulting allocation list will be generated and maintained by the Study Statistician. The list will be blocked and stratified by site and contact type (household versus healthcare worker). BLINDING (MASKING): This is a blinded study. HCQ and ascorbic acid will appear similar, and taste will be partially masked as HCQ can be bitter and ascorbic acid will be sour. The participants will be blinded to their randomization group once assigned. Study team members, apart from the Study Pharmacist and the unblinded statistical staff, will be blinded. Laboratory staff are blinded to the group allocation. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): The sample size for the study is N=2 000 participants randomized 1:1 to either HCZ (n=1 000) and ascorbic acid (n=1 000). TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version: 1.2 05 April 2020 Recruitment is ongoing, started March 31 and anticipated end date is September 30, 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Protocol Registry Number: NCT04328961 Date of registration: April 1, 2020, retrospectively registered FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Hydroxychloroquine/administration & dosage , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Contact Tracing , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Occupational Health , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Virus Shedding/drug effects , Young Adult
16.
PLoS Med ; 17(3): e1003040, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134952

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic QT interval prolongation is the most widely used risk marker for ventricular arrhythmia potential and thus an important component of drug cardiotoxicity assessments. Several antimalarial medicines are associated with QT interval prolongation. However, interpretation of electrocardiographic changes is confounded by the coincidence of peak antimalarial drug concentrations with recovery from malaria. We therefore reviewed all available data to characterise the effects of malaria disease and demographic factors on the QT interval in order to improve assessment of electrocardiographic changes in the treatment and prevention of malaria. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. We searched clinical bibliographic databases (last on August 21, 2017) for studies of the quinoline and structurally related antimalarials for malaria-related indications in human participants in which electrocardiograms were systematically recorded. Unpublished studies were identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) Evidence Review Group (ERG) on the Cardiotoxicity of Antimalarials. Risk of bias was assessed using the Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European Consortium (PROTECT) checklist for adverse drug events. Bayesian hierarchical multivariable regression with generalised additive models was used to investigate the effects of malaria and demographic factors on the pretreatment QT interval. The meta-analysis included 10,452 individuals (9,778 malaria patients, including 343 with severe disease, and 674 healthy participants) from 43 studies. 7,170 (68.6%) had fever (body temperature ≥ 37.5°C), and none developed ventricular arrhythmia after antimalarial treatment. Compared to healthy participants, patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria had shorter QT intervals (-61.77 milliseconds; 95% credible interval [CI]: -80.71 to -42.83) and increased sensitivity of the QT interval to heart rate changes. These effects were greater in severe malaria (-110.89 milliseconds; 95% CI: -140.38 to -81.25). Body temperature was associated independently with clinically significant QT shortening of 2.80 milliseconds (95% CI: -3.17 to -2.42) per 1°C increase. Study limitations include that it was not possible to assess the effect of other factors that may affect the QT interval but are not consistently collected in malaria clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment for malaria and fever-recovery-related QT lengthening is necessary to avoid misattributing malaria-disease-related QT changes to antimalarial drug effects. This would improve risk assessments of antimalarial-related cardiotoxicity in clinical research and practice. Similar adjustments may be indicated for other febrile illnesses for which QT-interval-prolonging medications are important therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Heart Rate , Malaria/physiopathology , Action Potentials , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnostic imaging , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/parasitology , Body Temperature Regulation , Cardiotoxicity , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Conduction System/parasitology , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Infant , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/parasitology , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(4): e181449, 2018 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646129

ABSTRACT

Importance: Latent hepatic Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites provoke repeated clinical attacks called relapses. Only primaquine phosphate kills hypnozoites, and its therapeutic activity may depend on naturally polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 isotype (CYP2D6) activity. Objective: To examine the association of impaired CYP2D6 genotypes and CYP2D6 metabolic phenotypes with therapeutic failure of directly observed high-dose primaquine treatment for P vivax malaria relapse. Design, Setting, and Participants: Nested case-control study of patients who, in July 2014, completed a randomized clinical trial of directly observed primaquine treatment for radical cure of acute P vivax malaria in an area of Indonesia where reinfection during 1 year of posttreatment follow-up was improbable. A total of 177 of 180 patients with P vivax malaria completed the clinical trial of primaquine treatment to prevent relapse; 151 were eligible for recruitment as controls. After screening, 59 potential control individuals (no relapse) and 26 potential case patients (relapse) were considered, and 36 controls and 21 cases were enrolled. Exposures: Cases and controls were exposed to P vivax malaria and primaquine therapy but had variable exposure to the enzymatic activity of CYP2D6, classified as impaired by a genotype-determined qualitative phenotype (poor or intermediate), genotype-determined activity score less than 1.5, or a log of the 24-hour pooled urine dextromethorphan-dextrorphan metabolic ratio greater than -1.0. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) of relapse with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism determined by genotype or measured by urinary dextromethorphan-dextrorphan metabolic ratio. Results: Among the 21 cases (mean [SD] age, 30.5 [6.3] years; all male) and 36 controls (mean [SD] age, 29.0 [3.6] years; all male), 6 CYP2D6 alleles (*1, *2, *4, *5, *10, and *41) occurred as 12 distinct genotypes, with model activity scores ranging from 0.0 to 2.0. Among 32 patients with genotypic activity scores of 1.0 or less, 18 had experienced relapse, whereas among the 25 with scores higher than 1.0, 3 had experienced relapse (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 2.1-57.0; P = .001). When the log of the metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan-dextrorphan was -1.0 or less, only 1 of 18 patients experienced relapse, whereas above that threshold (consistent with low metabolic activity), 20 of 39 patients experienced relapse (OR, 18; 95% CI, 2.2-148.0; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: Genotype-determined and directly measured impaired levels of CYP2D6 activity were associated with elevated risk of therapeutic failure. These findings suggest a natural variability in CYP2D6-dependent metabolism of primaquine as a key determinant of therapeutic efficacy against latent P vivax malaria.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Genotype , Malaria, Vivax/drug therapy , Phenotype , Plasmodium vivax/drug effects , Plasmodium vivax/genetics , Primaquine/pharmacology , Primaquine/therapeutic use , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol ; 58: 567-582, 2018 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992431

ABSTRACT

Malaria is a critical public health problem resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. Owing to the development of resistance toward current therapies, novel approaches to accelerate the development efforts of new malaria therapeutics are urgently needed. There have been significant advancements in the development of in vitro and in vivo experiments that generate data used to inform decisions about the potential merit of new compounds. A comprehensive disease-drug model capable of integrating discrete data from different preclinical and clinical components would be a valuable tool across all stages of drug development. This could have an enormous impact on the otherwise slow and resource-intensive process of traditional clinical drug development.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/pharmacology , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Malaria/drug therapy , Animals , Drug Development/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL