ABSTRACT
Objectives: The primary objective was to determine whether obliteration of the epitympanic area and mastoid cavity during canal wall up (CWU) cholesteatoma surgery reduces the rate of recurrent and residual cholesteatoma compared to not obliterating the same area. The secondary objective was to compare postoperative hearing outcomes between both techniques. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral center. One-hundred-fourty-three ears were included of patients (≥18y) who underwent a CWU tympanomastoidectomy for cholesteatoma with or without bony obliteration between January 2015 and March 2020 in the University Medical Center Utrecht. The median follow-up was respectively 1.4 (IQR 1.1-2.2) vs. 2.0 years (IQR 1.2-3.1) (p = 0.013). Interventions: All patients underwent CWU tympanomastoidectomy for cholesteatoma. For 73 ears bone dust, Bonalive® or a combination was used for obliteration of the mastoid and epitympanic area, the rest of the ears (n = 70) were not obliterated. In accordance with the Dutch protocol, included patients are planned to undergo an MRI scan with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) one, three and five years after surgery to detect recurrent or residual cholesteatoma. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was recurrent and residual cholesteatoma as evaluated by MRI-DWI and/or micro-otoscopy and confirmed by micro-otoscopy and/or revision surgery. The secondary outcome measure was the postoperative hearing. Results: In this cohort, the group treated with canal wall up tympanomastoidectomy with subsequent bony obliteration (73 ears, 51.0%) had significantly lower recurrent (4.1%) and residual (6.8%) cholesteatoma rates than the group without obliteration (70 ears, 25.7% and 20.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between both groups in postoperative bone conduction thresholds (mean difference 2.7â dB, p = 0.221) as well as the mean air-bone gap closure 6 weeks after surgery (2.3â dB in the non-obliteration and 1.5â dB in the obliteration group, p = 0.903). Conclusions: Based on our results, a canal wall up tympanomastoidectomy with bony obliteration is the treatment of choice, since the recurrent and residual disease rate is lower compared to the group without obliteration. The bony obliteration technique does not seem to affect the perceptive or conductive hearing results, as these are similar between both groups.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate perioperative findings and audiological and vestibular outcomes in patients operated for cholesteatoma with labyrinthine fistulas. Also to assess radiological fistula size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for a labyrinthine fistula caused by a cholesteatoma between 2015 and 2020 in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively investigated. Fistula size was determined on preoperative CT scan. Bone and air conduction pure tone average thresholds were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes, such as vertigo and otorrea were also evaluated. Main purpose was to determine whether there is a correlation between fistula size and postoperative hearing. Furthermore, perioperative findings and vestibular outcomes are evaluated. RESULTS: 21 patients (22 cases) with a labyrinthine fistula were included. There was no significant change after surgery in bone conduction pure tone average (preoperatively 27.6 dB ± 26.7; postoperatively 30.3 dB ± 34.3; p = 0.628) or air conduction pure tone average (preoperatively 58.7 dB ± 24.3; postoperatively 60.2 dB ± 28.3; p = 0.816). Fistula size was not correlated to postoperative hearing outcome. There were two patients with membranous labyrinth invasion: one patient was deaf preoperatively, the other acquired total sensorineural hearing loss after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sensorineural hearing loss after cholesteatoma surgery with labyrinthine fistula is rare. Fistula size and postoperative hearing loss are not correlated, however, membranous labyrinthine invasion seems to be related to poor postoperative hearing outcomes. Therefore, additional preoperative radiological work up, by MRI scan, in selected cases is advocated to guide the surgeon to optimize preoperative counselling.
