Efficacy and safety of durvalumab with olaparib in metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer (phase II DOMEC trial).

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer have a poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited. The investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase II DOMEC trial (NCT03951415) is the first trial to report data on efficacy and safety of combined treatment with PD-L1 and PARP inhibition for advanced endometrial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer were enrolled. Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously q4w and olaparib 300 mg 2dd until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Patients with at least 4 weeks of treatment were evaluable for analysis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months. Evidence for efficacy was defined as progression-free survival at 6 months in ≥50% of patients. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response and overall survival. RESULTS: From July 2019, through November 2020, 55 patients were enrolled. At data cut-off (September 2021), 4 of the 50 evaluable patients were still on treatment. Seventeen patients (34%) were progression-free at 6 months. Objective response rate was 16% (95% CI, 8.3 to 28.5) with 1 complete and 7 partial responses. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months, median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 6.2) and median overall survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 14.3). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8 patients (16%), predominantly anemia. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: The combination of durvalumab and olaparib was well tolerated, but did not meet the prespecified 50% 6-month progression-free survival in this heterogeneous patient population with advanced endometrial cancer.

Intraperitoneal treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, the Dutch experience. What did we learn?

BACKGROUND: Combined administration of intravenous (iv) and intraperitoneal (ip) (iv/ip) chemotherapy is an effective adjuvant treatment option after primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Increased toxicityand patient burden limit its use in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess toxicity and survival outcomes of iv/ip chemotherapy in daily practice in the Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 81 women who underwent at least an optimal PDS for FIGO stage III OC followed by iv/ip chemotherapy according to the Armstrong regimen, in four hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2007 and May 2016. We collected information on surgical procedure, abdominal port implantation, toxicity, and recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS: All participants underwent PDS, of whom 60 (74%) had their ip catheter implanted during PDS. Most frequently reported all grade toxicity was haematological n = 44 (54%). Forty-four patients (54%) completed all six cycles of iv/ip chemotherapy. The most frequent causes of discontinuation of iv/ip administration were renal dysfunction (12/37 = 32%) and catheter problems (7/37 = 19%). Median recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 24 months (range 0 - 108) and 80 months (range 4-115), respectively. Surgical outcome, completion of more than three courses of treatment and intra-abdominal localisation of recurrent disease were associated with better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, 54% of patients with advanced OC could complete all scheduled cycles of iv/ ip chemotherapy with acceptable morbidity and toxicity, leading to outcomes comparable with the results of published trials on iv/ip chemotherapy.

[Making better use of the clinical geneticist's expertise; treating physician could request a DNA test for most cancer patients]. / Expertise van klinisch geneticus beter benutten.

Eight university medical centres in the Netherlands have established clinical genetic services. Patients receive intensive, and therefore costly, genetic counselling before genetic testing takes place. In recent years the number of patients referred to clinical genetic services has risen dramatically, creating waiting-list backlogs. Knowing your carrier status in hereditary cancers, for instance for a BRCA1/2 mutation, can have consequences for surveillance, treatment, and prevention; however, 90% of patients with breast cancer do not have a mutation. We, therefore, argue that the pathway to genetic testing should be reconstructed in order to safeguard timely and adequate genetic testing for an increasing number of patients. The treating physician should be able to request a DNA test in carefully-selected patient-populations, and only refer patients for genetic counselling after a positive finding. Prerequisites for this 'mainstream pathway' are adequate training for medical specialists, good communication with genetics' departments, and guaranteed referral in uncertain or complex cases.

Comparing cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy with EMA/CO chemotherapy for the treatment of high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) days 1-5, methotrexate 300 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) day 1, actinomycin D 0.6 mg/m(2) day 2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) day 4, EMACP) was compared to EMA/CO (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) days 1-2, methotrexate 300 mg/m(2) day 1 and actinomycin D 0.5 mg i.v. bolus day 1 and 0.5 mg/m(2) day 2, alternating with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) day 8 and vincristine 1 mg/m(2) day 8) for the treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the Netherlands, 83 patients were treated with EMACP and 103 patients with EMA/CO. Outcome measures were remission rate, median number of courses to achieve normal human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) concentrations, toxicity, recurrent disease rate and disease specific survival. RESULTS: Remission rates were similar (EMACP 91.6%, EMA/CO 85.4%). The median number of courses of EMA/CO to reach hCG normalisation for single-agent resistant disease and primary high-risk disease was three and five courses, respectively, compared to 1.5 (p=0.001) and three (p<0.001) courses of EMACP. Patients treated with EMACP more often developed fever, renal toxicity, nausea and diarrhoea compared to patients treated with EMA/CO. Patients treated with EMA/CO more often had anaemia, neuropathy and hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: EMACP combination chemotherapy is an effective treatment for high-risk GTN, with a remission rate comparable to EMA/CO. However, the difference in duration of treatment is only slightly shorter with EMACP. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the form of EMACP in this study was not proven more effective than EMA/CO.

Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluated the optimal regimen of trabectedin administered every 3 weeks in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients previously treated with less than two or two previous chemotherapy lines were randomized to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m(2) 24 h (arm A, n = 54) or 1.3 mg/m(2) 3 h (arm B, n = 53). Objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST was the primary efficacy end point. Toxic effects were graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria v. 2.0. RESULTS: ORR was 38.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9% to 53.1%; arm A] and 35.8% (95% CI 23.1% to 50.2%; arm B) (intention-to-treat primary analysis). Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI 5.3-8.6 months; arm A) and 6.8 months (95% CI 4.6-7.4 months; arm B). Frequent severe adverse events were nausea/vomiting (24%, arm A; 15%, arm B) and fatigue (15%, arm A; 10%, arm B). Common severe laboratory abnormalities were transient, noncumulative neutropenia (55%, arm A; 37%, arm B) and transaminase increases (alanine aminotransferase, 55%, arm A; 59%, arm B). CONCLUSIONS: Both every-3-weeks trabectedin regimes, 1.5 mg/m(2) 24 h and 1.3 mg/m(2) 3 h, were active and reasonably well tolerated in AOC platinum-sensitive patients. Trabectedin every-3-weeks has promising activity and deserves to be further evaluated in relapsed AOC.

Embolization for hemorrhage of liver metastases from choriocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Because gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) is highly sensitive to chemotherapy, life-threatening hemorrhage from metastases can occur especially early after starting therapy. CASES: Two cases of post-term choriocarcinoma with liver metastases complicated by profuse life-threatening hemorrhage are reported. Emergency treatment with transcatheter angiographic embolization of the hepatic artery was performed to control bleeding. DISCUSSION: Although embolization of the iliac vessels for gynecologic malignancies, including GTD, have been described, this is the first time that embolization of the hepatic artery to control bleeding from liver metastases in GTD is reported. The use and indications for embolization are expanding, and also in acute hemorrhagic complications in GTD, this intervention should be considered.

Phase II study of carboplatin and whole body hyperthermia (WBH) in recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperthermia enhances carboplatin cytotoxicity preclinically, and clinical studies have shown radiant heat Whole Body Hyperthermia (WBH) to be safe. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of 41.8 degrees C WBH and carboplatin in recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer were explored. METHODS: Recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer patients were treated with 41.8 degrees C WBH and concurrent carboplatin, cycled every 28 days (max. 6 cycles). RESULTS: Twenty-one of 25 participants were evaluable for response: one complete remission, six partial responses, stable disease in nine patients and progression in five, leading to a response rate of 33%. Three of four evaluable chemotherapy pre-treated patients progressed, while this was seen in only 2 of 17 chemotherapy-naive patients. The median survival is 7.8 months (range 1.3 to 43+) and no patients were lost to follow up. Grades 3/4 toxicities were common: leukopenia in 35%, thrombopenia in 61% and anemia in 22% of all treatments. Excessive, partly reversible renal toxicity was seen in two patients (grades 3 and 4). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of WBH and carboplatin in recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer seems comparable to that of other palliative chemotherapy regimens in this disease. The considerable toxicity, though largely manageable, includes unexpected and severe unacceptable renal toxicity. This regimen seems less suitable for palliative care.

[Severe toxicity after treatment with capecitabine and fluorouracil due to partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency]. / Ernstige toxiciteit na behandeling met capecitabine en fluorouracil ten gevolge van een partiële dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenasedeficiëntie.

Two female patients, aged 48 and 52 years, developed severe bone marrow suppression and (gastrointestinal) mucositis following administration of capecitabine. Analysis of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed the presence of DPD deficiency. Both patients recovered in 3-4 weeks, and both had a (partial) remission of their tumours. Capecitabine is metabolised to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the body. DPD-deficiency leads to impaired breakdown of 5-FU and hence to severe cytotoxicity following treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU. The most common mutation, IVS14 + 1G > A, is found in approximately 2% of the Dutch population. In case of unexpected severe toxicity during 5-FU or capecitabine treatment, DPD deficiency should be considered. Screening could be considered in view of the widespread use of capecitabine and 5-FU, the severe toxicity that may develop in patients with low DPD activity and the prevalence of the mutation.

A Systemic Hyperthermia Oncologic Working Group trial. Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH. METHODS: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim. RESULTS: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach.

A pilot study of whole body hyperthermia and carboplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) to carboplatin (CBDCA) can induce responses in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. 16 pretreated patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were entered on a Systemic Hyperthermia Oncological Working Group (SHOWG) study; (14 patients were eligible with 14 evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response). The patients were treated with WBH (Aquatherm) 41.8 degrees C x 60 min in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) (area under the curve (AUC) of 8) every 4 weeks. Disease status was evaluated every two cycles. Patients were treated for a maximum of six cycles. One patient had a complete response (CR) and 4 had a partial response (PR). 4 patients had stable disease (SD). 3 patients had progressive disease (PD). 2 patients were unevaluable: 1 had a bowel obstruction shortly after her first treatment; the second patient achieved a CR, but only had one treatment secondary to an idiosyncratic reaction to sedative drugs. 2 patients entered on study were ineligible, as they did not meet criteria for platinum resistance; 1 entered a CR and 1 had SD. Dose-limiting toxicity, which required CBDCA dose reductions, was grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3/4), and nausea and/or vomiting. Consistent with preclinical modelling, these results suggests that 41.8 degrees C WBH can overcome platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. These observations suggest further investigation of the therapeutic potential of WBH in a group of patients who historically fail to respond to salvage therapies is warranted.

Toxin-mediated haemolytic uraemic syndrome without diarrhoea.

A 52-year-old previously healthy man was admitted to the hospital with haematuria, painful micturition and fever. Laboratory investigation showed the presence of a haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), characterized by haemolysis, renal insufficiency and mental disturbances. A urinary tract infection caused by a verotoxin-producing E. coli other than O157:H7 was diagnosed. Treatment of this infection resulted in his complete recovery from the illness. Both the search for a focus outside the gastrointestinal tract and the search for verotoxin genes by specific polymerase chain reaction can be crucial in a patient with HUS without preceding diarrhoea.

Sequence-dependent toxicity profile in modified FAMTX (fluorouracil-adriamycin-methotrexate) chemotherapy with lenograstim support for advanced gastric cancer: a feasibility study.

For advanced irresectible gastric cancer, sequential high-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (both on day 1) combined with adriamycin on day 15 (FAMTX regimen), cycled every 28 days, is a fairly effective but toxic treatment, with a high incidence of neutropenic fever, dose reductions and dose delays. In order to improve FAMTX toxicity, we studied the feasibility of two modified FAMTX regimens with lenograstim support. Seven advanced gastric cancer patients were treated with all three FAMTX drugs on day 1 followed by lenograstim 150 microgm(-2)for 10 days, in 21-day cycles (FUMA regimen). The next seven patients were treated with the same drugs at the same doses, but with adriamycin 1 day prior to methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil administration (AFUM regimen). Patients were monitored for toxicity, response, and survival. The total number of courses was 27 for FUMA and 35 for AFUM with a median of four courses per patient in each cohort. In the FUMA regimen, considerable toxicity consisting of mucositis and fatigue as well as grade 4 neutropenia occurred, and forced four out of seven patients to stop treatment. The consecutive AFUM regimen showed only mild toxicity, and all patients could finish treatment without dose reductions or delays. We found unanticipated and probably sequence-dependent toxicity profiles in two investigational, modified FAMTX schedules with lenograstim support, leading to high rates of dose-limiting toxicity in the FUMA regimen as opposed to mild toxicity in the AFUM regimen, even though the same total drug doses and treatment cycle length (dose intensity) were employed.

Feasibility and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal suramin in advanced malignancy.

PURPOSE: Bioactive lipids have been causally linked to intraabdominal malignancies such as ovarian cancer. In advanced tumors confined to the peritoneal cavity. inhibition of lipid growth factors present in ascites might induce tumor remissions. The systemic toxicity of the growth factor inhibitor suramin has so far hampered its use in standard oncologic practice, but this could be alleviated by intraperitoneal administration. In this study the feasibility, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal suramin administration are described. METHODS: Patients with histologically verified cancer confined to the abdominal cavity, for which no effective therapy was available, were treated with intraperitoneal suramin through a Tenckhoff catheter. Patients with ascites were treated with low-volume continuous i.p. infusions of 500 mg/24 h, and patients without ascites were treated with intermittent large-volume i.p. infusions of 1000 mg three times a week. Regular pharmacokinetic sampling of plasma and ascites fluid was carried out. Patients were treated for 6 weeks or until development of progressive disease or until plasma suramin levels exceeded 250 mg/l. RESULTS: Nine patients were treated in ten periods, three with intermittent i.p. suramin, and seven with continuous i.p. suramin, for a median of 28.5 days (16-42 days), with a median suramin dose of 12 g (range 9 21 g ). Treatment was discontinued because of high systemic suramin levels in three patients (all in the intermittent schedule), progressive disease (five patients) or completion of planned treatment (one patient). Toxicity was mild, without any of the systemic side effects commonly associated with suramin. Intraperitoneal suramin levels were consistently higher than plasma levels in all patients, but this effect was most marked in the continuous infusion schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal suramin infusion in patients with advanced peritoneal cancers is feasible and well-tolerated. Continuous low volume i.p. infusion in patients with ascites confers the largest pharmacokinetic advantage.

At home management of aplastic phase following high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue for hematological and non-hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: After high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support long hospital stays in the aplastic phase are expensive, lead to increased risk of hospital infections and to increasing pressure on available hospital beds. We developed a home care regimen that allows patients to be at home for most of the aplastic period, without daily hospital visits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1995 and December 1997, transfer of supportive care to the home setting took place in three phases for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell transplant for malignant lymphoma (one course of BEAM), breast cancer or germ-cell cancer (three courses of tCTC). In the inpatient cohort, the supportive care designed for at home use was administered in the hospital until neutrophile recovery to 0.5 x 10(9)/l. In the second, outpatient cohort, patients were discharged the day after stem-cell reinfusion but the supportive care was delivered daily in hospital. The third, home care cohort, consisted of patients who were discharged the day after stemcell reinfusion, after which specialized home care professionals delivered all supportive care including transfusions and parenteral antibiotics at home, with once weekly check-up in hospital by the transplant physician. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated with 81 cycles of high-dose chemotherapy (11, 18 and 13 patients and 17, 40 and 24 courses in the inpatient, outpatient and home care cohorts respectively). Inpatients were hospitalized in the aplastic phase for a median of 14 days. Patients in the outpatient cohort were at home in the aplastic phase for a median of six days (with a median of six days in hospital), and in the home care cohort for a median of 10 days (with a median of 1.5 days in hospital). Unscheduled readmissions and hospital visits were frequent in the outpatient and home care cohorts, mostly due to fever, central indwelling catheter malfunctioning or chemotherapy-related toxicity. However, patients could usually be discharged again after observation and treatment. No infectious deaths or unexpected emergencies occurred in the outpatient or home care cohort. Neither was there any suggestion of an increased number of fevers, infections, or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: At home management in the aplastic phase after high-dose chemotherapy and stemcell transplant by community-based professionals is feasible without signs of increased toxicity or infections.

Malignant effusions contain lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-like activity.

BACKGROUND: Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are bioactive phospholipids with mitogenic and growth factor-like activities that act via specific cell-surface receptors present in many normal and transformed cell types. LPA has recently been implicated as a growth factor present in ascites of ovarian cancer patients. The presence of LPA-like activity and the hypothesis that levels of this bioactivity in effusions of ovarian cancer patients are higher than those in effusions of other cancer patients was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A neurite retraction bioassay in a neuroblastoma cell line previously developed for in vitro detection of LPA activity on cell lines was employed and bioactivity was expressed in virtual LPA-equivalent levels. LPA-equivalent levels were tested in effusions of 62 patients with a range of malignancies, including 13 ovarian cancer patients. Biochemical and clinical parameters were evaluated for correlations with LPA-equivalent levels. RESULTS: Average LPA-equivalent levels were 50.2 microns (range 5.4-200) for all patients, and 94.5 microns (range 15-200) for ovarian cancer patients (P = 0.004). There were no additional independent significant correlations between LPA-equivalent levels in effusions and a range of other biochemical and clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: These data suggest a role for LPA-like lipids in the peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer and possibly that of other predominantly intraperitoneal malignancies.