Handling the desire to die- evaluation of an elective course for medical students.

BACKGROUND: The desire to die can occur in palliative care patients with a prevalence of up to 22%. Not every desire to die is accompanied by a pressure to act, but usually by a burden that can arise from various factors. To address this burden appropriately, health care workers should be trained. Based on an evaluated course on handling the desire to die, an elective course for medical students was developed and evaluated. In order to identify the impact of the elective course's content, a comparison of attitudes towards assisted dying with two other participant groups was conducted. Therefore, three questions from the evaluation of the elective course were used. METHOD: Online evaluation of the elective and questions addressing attitude were assessed using a five-point Likert scale. The specific outcome-based assessment was determined using the Comparative Self-Assessment Gain. The main participant group (group 1) were students who took the elective. The additional survey on attitudes towards assisted dying included undergraduate medical students who had taken compulsory palliative care courses (group 2) and physicians who had taken an introductory course in intensive care or emergency medicine (group 3). RESULTS: Group 1 (n = 13, response rate rr = 86.7%) was very satisfied with the blended learning format (100%) and the course itself (100%). They were able to deepen their knowledge (81.0%) and train skills (71.2%) through the course. In the additional surveys, there were 37 students in group 2 (rr = 66.1%) and 258 physicians in group 3 (rr = 73.6%). Willingness to assist with or accompany the various options for assisted dying varied according to the type of assistance. Among the participants, it can be summarised that the highest willingness was shown by the students of group 2 followed by the physicians of group 3 and the students of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: A course on handling the desire to die of palliative patients can deepen knowledge and train communication skills and thus support self-confidence. Dealing with the background of the desire to die, knowledge about assisted dying, but also one's own attitudes and responsibilities can influence the attitude towards assisted dying.

A comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of felodipine IV and nifedipine IV in patients with hypertensive crisis or emergency not responding to oral nifedipine.

OBJECTIVE: A clinical definition of a hypertensive emergency is excessively high blood pressure in the presence of symptoms indicating end organ damage. Equally high blood pressure without symptoms is called a hypertensive crisis. Patients with hypertensive crisis or emergency need prompt, effective, and specific therapy and a controlled reduction of blood pressure. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind multi-centre study, to compare the safety, efficacy and tolerability of an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (either nifedipine or felodipine) in 122 patients, of whom 63 were diagnosed as hypertensive emergencies and 59 as hypertensive crisis, who had not reacted adequately (diastolic blood pressure <115 mmHg) to 5 mg of nifedipine PO. RESULTS: Both drugs lowered blood pressure adequately in more than 90% of the patients and were well tolerated. Only one patient had to be withdrawn, because of an excessive decrease in blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Patients with excessively high blood pressure who do not react to oral nifedipine can be treated equally effectively with felodipine and nifedipine IV. Felodipine is easier to handle because of its lack of light sensitivity.

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during long-term antihypertensive treatment--a comparison between felodipine and the combination of felodipine and metoprolol.

Seventy-six hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were randomized to receive felodipine or felodipine plus metoprolol in a double-blind parallel-group study. The doses of each treatment regimen were titrated to obtain a diastolic blood pressure (BP) of less than 95 mmHg. The duration of the treatment was 9 months. At the end of the study, BP was significantly reduced in both groups, and the reduction did not differ between the groups. Left ventricular posterior wall and septum thickness were significantly and similarly reduced in both groups. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic end diameters were not significantly changed. Left ventricular mass (LVM) was significantly and similarly reduced in both treatment groups, as was the ratio of LVM and left ventricular end diastolic volume. In conclusion, felodipine and the combination of felodipine and metoprolol reduced left ventricular hypertrophy to the same extent when BP was similarly reduced.

[A simplified, Fully Enzymatic Cholesterol Determination: (author's transl)]. / Eine vereinfachte vollenzymatische Cholesterin- Bestimmung

The advantages of enzymatic analysis compared to conventional methods are shown by an example of a simplified, fully enzymatic cholesterol determination. They are: high analytical precision, reagents which are easy to handle, no inhibition be metabolites. The poor correlation between enzymatic and chemical analysis requires new normal values. The following are recommended for cholesterol: normal up to 200 mg/dl, requiring control 200-250 mg/dl and pathological over 250 mg/dl.