Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arthroscopy ; 37(1): 139-146, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33220466

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We sought to identify the immediate postoperative differences in opioid use, pain scores, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS) after hip arthroscopy related to the type of anesthesia used for the surgical procedure. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with labral tears by a single surgeon at an academic center between October 2017 and July 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was PACU opioid administration, measured by morphine equivalents. Secondary parameters included total LOS, postincision LOS, PACU LOS, and PACU arrival/discharge pain scores. Analyses conducted were t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, or χ2 tests. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients met inclusion criteria for this study; 54 male and 75 female, with an average age of 28 (±10.1) years. In total, 52 (40.3%) had general anesthesia and 77 (59.7%) had neuraxial anesthesia, including spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, which were intermixed throughout the study period. Intraoperative and PACU opioid administration demonstrated a significant difference in medians. Neuraxial methods required a lower morphine equivalents in both the operating room (30.0 vs 53.9, P = .001) and PACU (18.2 vs 31.2, P = 0.002). Neuraxial anesthesia had lower median PACU arrival and discharge pain scores (0.0 vs. 5.0, P = .001, 3.0 vs. 4.0, P = .013). There was no statistically significant difference in postincision LOS or traction time. General anesthesia was associated with a longer PACU phase 1 time (1.0 vs 1.3 hours, P = .005). No major adverse events such as death, disability, or prolonged hospitalization occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Neuraxial anesthesia use in routine hip arthroscopy was associated with lower immediate postoperative pain scores, lower intraoperative and immediate postoperative opioid requirements, and may be associated with shorter anesthesia recovery time without any major adverse events when compared with general anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Comparative Study.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural , Anesthesia, Spinal , Arthroscopy , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, General , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(1): 1-7, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851113

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier rate among surgical patients on an orthopaedic trauma service and to determine whether screening is an effective tool for reducing postoperative MRSA infection in this population. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-eight patients with operatively managed orthopaedic trauma conditions during the study period. Two hundred three patients (82%) had acute orthopaedic trauma injuries. Forty-five patients (18%) underwent surgery for a nonacute orthopaedic trauma condition, including 36 elective procedures and 9 procedures to address infection. INTERVENTION: MRSA screening protocol, preoperative antibiotics per protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: MRSA carrier rate, overall infection rate, MRSA infection rate. RESULTS: Our screening captured 71% (175/248) of operatively treated orthopaedic trauma patients during the study period. The overall MRSA carrier rate was 3.4% (6/175). When separated by group, the acute orthopaedic trauma cohort had an MRSA carrier rate of 1.4% (2/143), and neither MRSA-positive patient developed a surgical site infection. Only one MRSA infection occurred in the acute orthopaedic trauma cohort. The nonacute group had a significantly higher MRSA carrier rate of 12.5% (4/32, P = 0.01), and the elective group had the highest MRSA carrier rate of 15.4% (4/26, P < 0.01). The odds ratio of MRSA colonization was 10.1 in the nonacute group (95% confidence interval, 1.87-75.2) and 12.8 for true elective group (95% confidence interval, 2.36-96.5) when compared with the acute orthopaedic trauma cohort. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low MRSA colonization rate (1.4%) among patients presenting to our institution for acute fracture care. Patients undergoing elective surgery for fracture-related conditions such as nonunion, malunion, revision surgery, or implant removal have a significantly higher MRSA carrier rate (15.4%) and therefore may benefit from MRSA screening. Our results do not support routine vancomycin administration for orthopaedic trauma patients whose MRSA status is not known at the time of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Orthopedics , Staphylococcal Infections , Carrier State/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
3.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 65 Suppl 1: S44-9, 2014 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24321986

ABSTRACT

As information and communication technology infrastructure becomes more reliable, new methods of electronic data capture, data marts/data warehouses, and mobile computing provide platforms for rapid coordination of international research projects and multisite studies. However, despite the increasing availability of Internet connectivity and communication systems in remote regions of the world, there are still significant obstacles. Sites with poor infrastructure face serious challenges participating in modern clinical and basic research, particularly that relying on electronic data capture and Internet communication technologies. This report discusses our experiences in supporting research in resource-limited settings. We describe examples of the practical and ethical/regulatory challenges raised by the use of these newer technologies for data collection in multisite clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Data Collection/methods , Health Resources , Medical Informatics , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/standards , Cell Phone , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Internet
4.
Eur J Neurosci ; 25(1): 298-306, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17241291

ABSTRACT

Behavioral and physiological studies have indicated the existence of a temporal window of auditory integration (TWI), within which similar sounds are perceptually grouped. The current study exploits the combined temporal and spatial resolution of fast optical imaging (the event-related optical signal, EROS) to show that brain activity elicited by sounds within and outside the TWI differs in location and latency. In a previous event-related brain potential (ERP) study [Sable, Gratton, and Fabiani (2003) European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2492-2496], we found that the mismatch negativity (MMN; a brain response to acoustic irregularities) elicited by deviations in stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) had a unique shape when the deviant SOA was within the TWI. In the present study, we extended these ERP results using EROS. Participants heard trains of five tones. The first four tones had SOAs of 96, 192, 288 or 384 ms. The SOA of the fourth and fifth tones was either the same (standard) or one of the other three (deviant) SOAs. With a deviant SOA of 96 ms, the cortical response was approximately 2 cm anterior to responses to longer SOA deviants, and was followed by a later response that was absent in the other conditions. Similarly to the electrical MMN, the optical mismatch response amplitudes were proportional to the magnitude of interval deviance. These results, in combination with our previous findings, indicate that the temporal integration of sounds is reflected in cortical mismatch responses that differ from the typical response to interval deviance.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain Mapping , Diagnostic Imaging , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Auditory Cortex/anatomy & histology , Contingent Negative Variation/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Humans , Reaction Time/physiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL