Development of a novel radiographic measure of lumbar instability and validation using the facet fluid sign.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal instability is frequently referenced in clinical practice and the scientific literature despite the lack of a standard definition or validated radiographic test. The Quantitative Stability Index (QSI) is being developed as a novel objective test for sagittal plane lumbar instability. The QSI is calculated using lumbar flexion-extension radiographs. The goal of the current study was to use the facet fluid sign on MRI as the "gold standard" and determine if the QSI is significantly different in the presence of the fluid sign. METHODS: Sixty-two paired preoperative MRI and flexion-extension exams were obtained from a large FDA IDE study. The MRI exams were assessed for the presence of a facet fluid sign, and the QSI was calculated from sagittal plane intervertebral rotation and translation measurements. The QSI is based on the translation per degree of rotation (TPDR) and is calculated as a Z-score. A QSI > 2 indicates that the TPDR is > 2 std dev above the mean for an asymptomatic and radiographically normal population. The reproducibility of the QSI was also tested. RESULTS: The mean difference between trained observers in the measured QSI was between -0.28 and 0.36. The average QSI was significantly (P = 0.047, one-way analysis of variance) higher at levels with a definite fluid sign (2.3±3.2 versus 0.60±2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Although imperfect, the facet fluid sign observed may be the best currently available test for lumbar spine instability. Using the facet fluid sign as the "gold standard" the current study documents that the QSI can be expected to be significantly higher in the presence of the facet fluid sign. This supports that QSI might be used to test for sagittal plane lumbar instability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A validated, objective and practical test for spinal instability would facilitate research to understand the importance of instability in diagnosis and treatment of low-back related disorders.

Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at determining the variables that may prove useful in predicting clinical outcomes following lumbar disc arthroplasty. METHODS: Pre- and post-operative imaging assessments were obtained for 99 single-level lumbar disc arthroplasty patients from a prospective IDE study. The assessments and patient demographics were tested to identify variables that were significantly associated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Clinical outcome data were available for 85 % of patients at the 5-year follow-up. Numerous assessments made from the pre-operative imaging were found to have statistically significant associations with clinical outcomes at 2 and 5 years. The most notable factors were related to the amount of degeneration at the index level, with patients achieving better outcome scores at 5 years if they have higher grades of degeneration preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Several variables may prove effective at optimizing clinical outcomes including a preoperative disc height <8 mm, Modic type 2 changes adjacent to the target disc, a low amount of lordosis present at the treatment level, low levels of fatty replacement of the paraspinal musculature, a prominent amount of facet joint or disc degeneration, and the presence of flat or convex vertebral endplates. There were also post-operative findings associated with better patient outcomes including a larger percent of the endplate covered with the implant, larger implant heights, greater increases in disc space heights, and a larger increase in index level lumbar lordosis. These variables could be explored in other clinical studies to facilitate meta-analyses that could identify effective strategies to optimize clinical outcomes with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Asymmetric motion distribution between components of a mobile-core lumbar disc prosthesis: an explanation of unequal wear distribution in explanted CHARITÉ polyethylene cores.

BACKGROUND: The biconvex mobile core of the CHARITÉ lumbar disc prosthesis forms two joints (spherical bearings) with the metal end plates. We quantified the intra-prosthesis motion to test the hypothesis that the total prosthesis motion would not be equally distributed between the two bearings of implanted CHARITÉ discs, which might explain the unequal wear distribution reported in explanted cores. METHODS: The hypothesis was tested by studying the flexion-extension motion responses of (1) twenty-six monosegmental CHARITÉ III discs implanted in nineteen human cadaveric lumbar spines, and (2) twenty-one CHARITÉ III discs (fifteen monosegmental, six bisegmental) implanted in eighteen patients in other published clinical studies. Intra-prosthesis motions were quantified with use of a radiographic image analysis technique. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of the CHARITÉ discs implanted in cadaveric specimens exhibited larger motion at the superior bearing, with 54% demonstrating more than twice as much motion at the superior bearing as at the inferior bearing. The ratio of motion at the superior bearing to motion at the inferior bearing averaged 2.68 ± 1.84, which was significantly larger than 1.0 (p < 0.001). Ninety percent of prostheses implanted in patients showed larger motion at the superior bearing. The motion ratio averaged 2.39 ± 2.47 for monosegmental cases and 2.55 ± 2.66 for all cases; both ratios were significantly larger than 1.0 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found preferentially larger motion at the superior bearing of the CHARITÉ discs implanted in human cadaveric lumbar spines and in patients, regardless of the implanted level.

Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial from one study site. OBJECTIVE: Examine the radiographic sagittal alignment of the Bryan cervical disc for one-level disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective, randomized studies demonstrate Bryan arthroplasty provides statistically better functional outcomes than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Uncontrolled case reports describe kyphosis after disc replacement. No prospective study has critically assessed sagittal alignment after cervical arthroplasty. METHODS: Forty-eight patients reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Quantitative motion analysis determined the change in overall (C2-C7) and treatment-level sagittal alignment, disc space heights, and range of motion. RESULTS: Preoperatively, overall sagittal alignment was equivalent in the two groups. At 24-month follow-up, overall lordosis for the cohorts was not statistically different from preoperative values for each group. In addition, overall lordosis was not significantly different at 24 months when comparing Bryan patients with the fusion patients. The average change in disc angle from preoperative to immediate postoperative at the treated level in the Bryan disc group was a nonsignificant increase in lordosis of 0.92°. The anterior disc height was the same at all time points, but the posterior disc height was slightly (0.7 mm) more in the Bryan than in the fusion patients (P = 0.04). The angular range of motion in the Bryan group was statistically equivalent at all time points. At the fused levels, average range of motion decreased from 6.4° to 0.9° at 24 months (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: With the Bryan disc, there was an insignificant increase in lordosis of 0.9° at immediate postoperative time point. Overall cervical sagittal alignment is not different between the experimental and control populations. This prospective study does not demonstrate a clinically significant increase in segmental kyphosis after Bryan disc arthroplasty. Global cervical lordosis is statistically equivalent between arthroplasty and fusion groups at 2 years follow-up.

Determination of the in vivo posterior loading environment of the Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The in vivo loading environment of load-bearing implants is generally largely unknown. Loads are typically approximated from cadaver tests or biomechanical calculations for the preclinical assessment of a device's safety and efficacy. PURPOSE: To determine the actual in vivo loading environment of an elastic interlaminar-interspinous implant (Coflex). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective radiographic study to noninvasively measure the in vivo implant loads of 176 patients. METHODS: For this study, neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs were quantitatively analyzed using validated image analysis technology. The angle between the Coflex arms was measured for each radiograph and statistically evaluated. Separately, the Coflex implant was characterized using mechanical test data and finite element analysis, which resulted in a load-deformation formula that describes the implant load as a function of its size and elastic deformation. Using the formula and the elastic implant deformation data obtained from the radiographic analysis, the exact implant load was calculated for each patient and each posture. For statistical analysis, the patients were grouped by indication and procedure, which resulted in 12 different groups. The determined loads were compared with the strength of the posterior lumbar spinal elements obtained from the literature and with the static and dynamic mechanical limits of the Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant. RESULTS: The force data were independent of implant size, diagnosis (with one exception), number of levels of the decompression procedure, number of levels of implantations (one or two), and follow-up time. The median compressive force acting on the Coflex implant was found to be 45.8 N. The maximum load change between flexion and extension was 140 N; the maximum overall load exceeded 239 N in extension. CONCLUSIONS: The average loads exerted by the Coflex implant on the spinous process and lamina are 11.3% and 7.0% of their respective static failure load. The implant fatigue strength is significantly higher than the measured median force, which explains the extremely rare observation of a Coflex fatigue failure.