Clinical and Imaging Outcomes of Surgically Repaired Cerebrospinal Fluid-Venous Fistulas Identified by Lateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical repair of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistula (CVF), an increasingly recognized cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension that is poorly responsive to epidural blood patch (EBP). METHODS: Retrospective review identified adult patients who had lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography indicative of cerebrospinal fluid leak at Mayo Clinic between November 2018 and February 2020, with clearly localized CVF, followed by surgical treatment. Patients without available imaging before or after surgery were excluded. History of EBP and clinical response to EBP were evaluated along with surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 25 patients with CVF who met protocol criteria and were included in the data analysis, 22 (88%) received EBP, but clinical benefit lasting ≥4 weeks occurred in only 2 of 22 (9%). Headache was the most prominent preoperative feature among patients (24/25; 96%). Following surgery, 18 of 24 (75%) patients had complete headache improvement, 4 (17%) had partial improvement, and 2 (8%) had no improvement. Ten of 25 (40%) patients reported cognitive disturbance at baseline; at follow-up, 5 of 10 (50%) had complete improvement, 3 (30%) had partial improvement, and 2 (20%) had no improvement. On postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging, 6 of 25 (24%) patients had complete resolution of findings by Bern score criteria, 18 (72%) showed partial improvement, and 1 (4%) patient showed no improvement. Adverse events were minor and included surgical site pain and paresthesias. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of CVF resulted in improvements in headache and other symptoms, with few side effects.

Current Understanding of the Pathophysiology and Approach to Tension-Type Headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Description of headache dates back thousands of years, and to date, tension-type headache (TTH) remains the most common form of headache. We will review the history and current understanding of the pathophysiology of TTH and discuss the recommended clinical evaluation and management for this syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite being the most prevalent headache disorder, TTH pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Patients with TTH tend to have muscles that are harder, more tender to palpation, and may have more frequent trigger points of tenderness than patients without headache. However, cause and effect of these muscular findings are unclear. Studies support both peripheral and central mechanisms contributing to the pain of TTH. Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, while the focus of evaluation is to rule out possible secondary causes of headache. Treatment options have remained similar over the course of the past decade, with some additional studies supportive of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological options. An approach to TTH has been outlined including historical context, evolution over time, and the best evidence regarding our current understanding of the complex pathophysiology and treatment of this disease.

COVID-19 and Headache Medicine: A Narrative Review of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) and Corticosteroid Use.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current literature on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and corticosteroid use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, recognizing that these are commonly used treatments in the field of headache medicine. BACKGROUND: The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids in patients during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a controversial topic within the medical community and international and national health organizations. Lay press and social media outlets have circulated opinions on this topic despite the fact that the evidence for or against the use of these medications is sparse. In the field of headache medicine, these medications are used commonly and both patients and clinicians may have questions or hesitations pertaining to their use during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A detailed search of the scientific and popular literature was performed. RESULTS: There is limited literature pertaining to the safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids during the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there are no clear scientific data that preclude the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the general population who may acquire COVID-19 or in those acutely infected with the virus. Several health organizations have concluded that treatment with corticosteroids during active infection should be avoided due to concerns of prolonged viral shedding in the respiratory tract and the lack of survival benefit based on the data from past coronaviruses and influenza virus; specific exceptions exist including treatment for underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, septic shock, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: Scientific information regarding the COVID-19 pandemic is constantly evolving, and limited or contradictory information can lead to confusion for both patients and clinicians. It is recommended that prior to prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids for the treatment of headache, clinicians have open discussions with their patients about the potential risks and benefits of using these medications during the COVID-19 pandemic. This manuscript summarizes the currently available evidence and understanding about these risks and benefits to help clinicians navigate such discussions.

Headache in epilepsy: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and characteristics of interictal and postictal headaches (using International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria) in a population of patients with epilepsy admitted to the Mayo Clinic Rochester epilepsy monitoring unit and assess their localizing value. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Participants were voluntarily recruited upon admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit. Two separate questionnaires were then administered. The first was to assess the presence and character of headaches experienced in the past 12 months. The second was to assess characteristics of postictal headaches experienced during their admission including localization. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty subjects (77%) met inclusion criteria and completed the initial questionnaire. Mean age was 38.1 years (range 18-82), and 67 (55.8%) were female. Interictal headaches were reported in 97 of 120 (81%) subjects, and these met ICHD3 criteria for migraine in 48 (50%). Postictal headaches were reported by 75 of 120 (63%) subjects on the initial admission questionnaire, representing migraine in 38 (51%). Thirty-nine (32%) subjects completed the secondary questionnaire related to postictal headaches experienced during admission, of which nine (23%) met criteria for migraine. There was no seizure lateralizing or localizing value noted based on postictal headache localization. SIGNIFICANCE: Migraine was frequent in this cohort and appears to be the dominant interictal and postictal headache type in patients with epilepsy. In this study, the first to assess incident postictal headache in the setting of an ictal EEG, headache localization was of no seizure localizing value. Few patients were being actively treated; suggesting headache management is often overlooked in the epilepsy population.

Diagnostic Dilemma in Primary Blastomyces dermatitidis Meningitis: Role of Neurosurgical Biopsy.

A 52-year-old male on chronic prednisone for polymyalgia rheumatica presented with a subacute history of headaches, nausea, phonophobia, intermittent diplopia and gait instability. He was hospitalized 2 weeks prior to presentation with extensive evaluations only notable for leptomeningeal inflammation on MRI. His symptoms progressively worsened and he developed aphasia. He was transferred to our facility where extensive spinal fluid examinations were repeated and were again nondiagnostic. Ultimately, a diagnostic skull-based biopsy was performed which demonstrated Blastomyces dermatitidis fungal meningitis. Despite extensive sampling and cultures, only 1 of the intraoperative samples yielded diagnostic results. This underscores the low sensitivity of current methods to diagnose CNS blastomycosis. This case suggests that a neurosurgical biopsy may be necessary and should be considered early in the diagnostic process, especially if a definitive diagnosis is elusive. If a biopsy is performed, sampling should be ample and from multiple areas. Following the diagnosis, our patient was treated with liposomal amphotericin B and then voriconazole with a good clinical response.