ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose: For an ischemic stroke patient whose onset occurs outside of the catchment area of a hospital that is capable of Endovascular Treatment (EVT) and whose stroke is suspected to be caused by a large vessel occlusion (LVO), a transportation dilemma exists. Bypassing the nearest stroke hospital will delay Alteplase but expedite EVT. Not bypassing allows for confirmation of an LVO diagnosis before transfer to an EVT-enabled facility, but ultimately delays EVT. Air transport can reduce a patient's overall time to treatment however, it is costly. We expanded on an existing model to predict where Drip-and-Ship vs. Mothership provides better outcomes by including rotary air transport, and we also included prediction of where either the transport method was most cost effective. Methods: An existing model predicts the outcome of patients who screen positive for an LVO in the field based on how they were transported, Drip-and-Ship (alteplase-only facility first, then EVT-enabled facility) or Mothership (direct to EVT-enabled facility). In our model, the addition of rotary wing transportation was conditionally applied to inter-facility transfer scenarios where it provided a time advantage. Both patient outcome and transport cost functions were developed for Mothership and Drip-and-Ship strategies including transfers via either ground or air depending on the conditional probabilities. Experiments to model real world scenarios are presented by varying the driving time between the alteplase-only and EVT-enabled facility, time to treatment efficiencies at the alteplase-only facility, and EVT eligibility for LVO patients. Patient outcome and transport costs were evaluated for Mothership and Drip-and-Ship strategies. Results: The results are presented in temporospatial diagrams that are color coded to indicate which strategy optimizes the objectives. In most regions, there was overall agreement between the optimal solution when considering patient outcomes or transport costs. Small regions exist where outcome and cost are divergent; however, the difference between the divergence in Mothership and Drip-and-Ship in these regions is marginal. Conclusions: The optimal transport method can be optimized for both patient outcomes and transport costs.