Development of a Multidisciplinary Professional Advancement Framework.

The creation of professional advancement programs is an important goal to support development of nurses and other team members. Maintaining consistency among programs within one institution poses a challenge. The development of an overarching framework has provided this structure. Our framework is composed of core components, key elements, and best practices that can be applied to ensure consistency among all programs. This framework can be applied to existing programs or guide new eight programs.

Implementing team-based newborn well care: Perspectives of nurses and physicians.

PURPOSE: Pediatric primary care redesign includes changes to clinical teams and clinical workflows. This study described the perspectives of pediatric clinicians on their experience with redesign. DESIGN AND METHODS: This qualitative study explored clinician perspectives on a newborn care redesign pilot at a pediatric primary care site. Newborn Hallway (NBH), implemented in 2019, clustered morning newborn visits with a single physician, increased RN staffing, and provided newborn-specific training for RNs. NBH also revised visit documentation templates to promote communication between RNs and physicians and shared completion of history taking and education. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinicians. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and coded using an integrated approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 17 staff (8 physicians, 8 RNs, 1 nurse practitioner) from 3/2020 to 1/2021. Clinicians reported that NBH implementation was facilitated by widespread agreement on baseline challenges to newborn care, and interest in optimizing roles for RNs. Clinicians believed NBH facilitated teamwork, which mitigated unpredictability in newborn needs and arrival times, and improved staff satisfaction. Perceived barriers to NBH included staffing constraints and ambivalence about whether sharing tasks with RNs would negatively influence patient relationships and continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric primary care redesign focused on sharing tasks between RNs and physicians can promote teamwork and address unpredictability in clinical settings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Resolving questions about how redesign influences patient continuity and trust, and clarifying optimal staffing may help facilitate adoption of clinical team and workflow innovations.

Roles of Registered Nurses in Pediatric Preventive Care Delivery: A Pilot Study on Between-office Variation and Within-office Role Overlap.

PURPOSE: Registered nurses (RN) participate in delivery of routine pediatric preventive care. This pilot study characterized variation in RN roles and overlap with other team roles. METHODS: We conducted a pilot cross-sectional survey of RNs from an urban/suburban pediatric primary care network. RNs described tasks during preventive visits and other staff completing similar tasks. Health system data characterized office staffing, volume, and patient population. We assessed whether role overlap and time on key tasks was associated with office characteristics or staffing ratios. RESULTS: Twenty-three offices reported a mean ratio of RNs to physicians and nurse practitioners of 0.99 (range 0.62-1.33). Of tasks RNs completed during preventive care, health education overlapped most with physician/nurse practitioner roles (17 sites with overlap) and rooming patients overlapped most with medical assistant roles (20 sites with overlap). Across sites, RNs spent 9% of time on health education and 26% on rooming. Offices with more role overlap between RNs and physicians/nurse practitioners had higher RN to physician/nurse practitioner ratios (1.13 versus 0.86, t-test p-value 0.002). There was no association between role overlap and other office characteristics, or between RN time on key tasks and staffing ratios. CONCLUSIONS: RN staffing ratios varied twofold across offices. RNs spent more time on tasks that overlapped with medical assistant roles than tasks that overlapped with physician/nurse practitioner roles. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Opportunities exist to optimize RN pediatric primary care roles, for example by delegating certain tasks. Optimization may reduce costs, while improving quality, patient experience, and staff satisfaction.

Medical Emergencies in the Primary Care Setting: An Evidence Based Practice Approach Using Simulation to Improve Readiness.

BACKGROUND: Simulation is an evidenced based strategy which has been shown to impact office-based readiness to respond in a medical emergency. Medical emergencies occur in the primary care setting on a less frequent basis than in the inpatient setting. Clinicians working in primary care may benefit from an opportunity to refresh their skills. METHODS: This descriptive pre and post survey design evidenced based project examined staff reported levels of competence and confidence when responding to an emergency in a pediatric primary care office. Simulation educators partnered with ambulatory nursing and medical leaders to create a mock code program for staff in a care network. During a 14-month period, simulations were conducted in 30 primary care sites. Staff completed pre- and post-simulation surveys to assess levels of confidence in decision-making skills and competence when managing medical emergencies. FINDINGS: A statistically significant increase in the mean scores for both confidence and competence was demonstrated when comparing pre- and post-simulation survey results. DISCUSSION AND APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Simulation as an educational technique resulted in an increased level of competence and confidence of primary care office staff to respond to an emergency. Additionally, staff developed an overall heightened awareness of emergency processes and recognized of the value of simulation as an educational tool.

The Use of Laparoscopy Simulation to Explore Gender Differences in Resident Surgical Confidence.

Background. The objective of this study was to determine whether female surgical residents underestimate their surgical abilities relative to males on a standardized test of laparoscopic skill. Methods. Twenty-six male and female general surgery residents and 25 female obstetrics and gynecology residents at two academic centers were asked to predict their score prior to undergoing the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery standardized skills exam. Actual and predicted score as well as delta values (predicted score minus actual score) were compared between residents. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine variables associated with predicted score, actual score, and delta scores. Results. There was no difference in actual score based on residency or gender. Predicted scores, however, were significantly lower in female versus male general surgery residents (25.8 ± 13.3 versus 56.0 ± 16.0; p < 0.01) and in female obstetrics and gynecology residents versus male general surgery residents (mean difference 20.9, 95% CI 11.6-34.8; p < 0.01). Male residents more accurately predicted their scores while female residents significantly underestimated their scores. Conclusion. Gender differences in estimating surgical ability exist that do not reflect actual differences in performance. This finding needs to be considered when structuring mentorship in surgical training programs.