Can Military Role 1 Practitioners Maintain Their Skills Working at Civilian Level 1 Trauma Centers: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Introduction: Military Role 1 practitioners have difficulty maintaining skill competency by working solely in military medical treatment facilities. Recognizing this, the Army Medical Department has renewed focus on physician specialty-specific Individual Critical Task Lists (ICTL) and is increasing the number of military-civilian partnerships, wherein small military treatment teams work full-time in civilian trauma centers. Yet, data to validate this approach is lacking. We hypothesize military Role 1 practitioners working full-time at a civilian Level 1 trauma center would attain similar resuscitation-specific procedural frequency to providers deployed to an active combat zone, and use the emergency medicine (EM) ICTL to compare select procedural frequency between a cohort of trauma patients from a civilian Level 1 trauma center and a cohort of combat casualties from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR). METHODS: We compared a selected subset of critically-injured, military-aged (18-35 years) trauma patients who were seen in a Level I Trauma Center emergency department (ED) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017 and dispositioned directly either to the operating room, intensive care unit, or morgue to a selected cohort from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) who were seen in EDs in Iraq and Afghanistan between January 2007 and August 2016 using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome was the frequency of ICTL procedures performed, and the secondary outcome was injury severity. RESULTS: We identified 843 civilian patients meeting inclusion criteria, of 1,719 military-aged patients captured by the trauma registry during the study. The selected cohort from the DODTR included 27,359 patients. Demographics were similar between the 2 groups, except the DODTR cohort included significantly more patients with blast trauma (55% versus 0.4%). We found similar ICTL procedural frequency (1 procedure for every 1.84 patients in the civilian cohort compared to one procedure/1.52 patients in the military cohort). CONCLUSION: Role-1 ICTL trauma procedures were performed at similar frequencies between civilian patients seen at a Level 1 trauma center and combat casualties. With proper practice implementation, the opportunity exists for Role 1 practitioners to maintain their trauma resuscitation skills at civilian trauma centers.

Clot Formation Is Associated With Fibrinogen and Platelet Forces in a Cohort of Severely Injured Emergency Department Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulation, fibrinogen consumption, fibrinolytic activation, and platelet dysfunction all interact to produce different clot formation responses after trauma. However, the relative contributions of these coagulation components to overall clot formation remain poorly defined. We examined for sources of heterogeneity in clot formation responses after trauma. METHODS: Blood was sampled in the emergency department from patients meeting trauma team activation criteria at an urban trauma center. Plasma prothrombin time of 18 s or longer was used to define traumatic coagulopathy. Mean kaolin-activated thrombelastography (TEG) parameters were calculated and tested for heterogeneity using analysis of means. Discriminant analysis and forward stepwise variable selection with linear regression were used to determine if prothrombin time, fibrinogen, platelet contractile force (PCF), and D-dimer concentration, representing key mechanistic components of coagulopathy, each contribute to heterogeneous TEG responses after trauma. RESULTS: Of 95 subjects, 16% met criteria for coagulopathy. Coagulopathic subjects were more severely injured with greater shock and received more blood products in the first 8 h compared with noncoagulopathic subjects. Mean (SD) TEG maximal amplitude (MA) was significantly decreased in the coagulopathic group (57.5 [SD, 4.7] mm vs. 62.7 [SD, 4.7], t test P < 0.001). The MA also exceeded the ANOM predicted upper decision limit for the noncoagulopathic group and the lower decision limit for the coagulopathic group at α = 0.05, suggesting significant heterogeneity from the overall cohort mean. Fibrinogen and PCF best discriminated TEG MA using discriminant analysis. Fibrinogen, PCF, and D-dimer were primary covariates for TEG MA using regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in TEG-based clot formation in emergency department trauma patients was linked to changes in MA. Individual parameters representing fibrin polymerization, PCFs, and fibrinolysis were primarily associated with TEG MA after trauma and should be the focus of early hemostatic therapies.