Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 789: 147857, 2021 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34323835

ABSTRACT

The feasibility and added value of an ecosystem services approach in retrospective environmental risk assessment were evaluated using a site-specific case study in a lowland UK river. The studied water body failed to achieve good ecological status temporarily in 2018, due in part to the exceedance of the environmental quality standard (annual average EQS) for zinc. Potential ecosystem service delivery was quantified for locally prioritised ecosystem services: regulation of chemical condition; maintaining nursery populations and habitats; recreational fishing; nature watching. Quantification was based on observed and expected taxa or functional groups within WFD biological quality elements, including macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, and on published functional trait data for constituent taxa. Benthic macroinvertebrate taxa were identified and enumerated before, during and after zinc EQS exceedance, enabling a generic retrospective risk assessment for this biological quality element, which was found to have good ecosystem service potential. An additional targeted risk assessment for zinc was based on laboratory-based species sensitivity distributions normalised using biotic-ligand modelling to account for site-specific, bioavailability-corrected zinc exposure. Risk to ecosystem services for diatoms (microalgae) was found to be high, while risks for benthic macroinvertebrates and fish were found to be low. The status of potential ecosystem service delivery (ESD) by fish was equivalent to high ecological status defined under the WFD, while ESD was higher for benthic macroinvertebrates than defined by WFD methods. The illustrated ecosystem services approach uses readily available data and adds significantly to the taxonomic approach currently used under the WFD by using functional traits to evaluate services that are prioritised as being important in water bodies. The main shortcomings of the illustrated approach were lack of: representation of bacteria and fungi; WFD predicted species lists for diatoms and macrophytes; site-specific functional trait data required for defining actual (rather than potential) ecosystem service delivery.

2.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 39(1): 118-130, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31880836

ABSTRACT

The primary goal of the present study is to provide a broad view of best practices for evaluating bioavailability models for metals for use in the protection of aquatic life. We describe the state of the science regarding 1) the evaluation and selection of ecotoxicity data, 2) the selection of bioavailability models for use in normalization, and 3) subsequent application of bioavailability models. Although many examples of normalization steps exist worldwide, a scheme is proposed to evaluate and select a model that takes account of its representativeness (water chemistry and taxonomic coverage of the ecotoxicity data set) and validation performance. Important considerations for a suitable model are the quantity of inputs needed, accuracy, and ease of use, all of which are needed to set protective values for aquatic life and to use these values to evaluate potential risks to organisms in receiving waters. Although the end results of different model application approaches may be broadly similar, the differences in these application frameworks ultimately come down to a series of trade-offs between who needs to collect the data and use the bioavailability model, the different requirements of spatial scales involved (e.g., regional vs site-specific values), and model predictiveness and protectiveness. Ultimately, understanding the limits and consequences of these trade-offs allows for selection of the most appropriate model and application framework to best provide the intended levels of aquatic life protection. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;39:118-130. © 2019 SETAC.


Subject(s)
Aquatic Organisms/metabolism , Fresh Water/chemistry , Metals , Models, Biological , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Aquatic Organisms/drug effects , Biological Availability , Metals/metabolism , Metals/toxicity , Risk Assessment , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
3.
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol ; 248: 111-189, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30671689

ABSTRACT

Metal-rich sediments have the potential to impair life in freshwater streams and rivers and, thereby, to inhibit recovery of ecological conditions after any remediation of mine water discharges. Sediments remain metal-rich over long time periods and have long-term potential ecotoxicological interactions with local biota, unless the sediments themselves are physically removed or replaced by less metal-rich sediment. Laboratory-derived environmental quality standards are difficult to apply to the field situation, as many complicating factors exist in the real world. Therefore, there is a strong case to consider other, field-relevant, measures of toxic effects as alternatives to laboratory-derived standards and to seek better biological tools to detect, diagnose and ideally predict community-level ecotoxicological impairment. Hence, this review concentrated on field measures of toxic effects of metal-rich sediment in freshwater streams, with less emphasis on laboratory-based toxicity testing approaches. To this end, this review provides an overview of the impact of metal-rich sediments on freshwater stream life, focusing on biological impacts linked to metal contamination.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Metals/analysis , Mining , Rivers , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Fresh Water , Geologic Sediments/chemistry
5.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(4): 3053-3059, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28432624

ABSTRACT

The UK has adopted a broader approach to the introduction of Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) for the aquatic environment than many other jurisdictions around the world, with a greater focus on the implementation of scientifically derived standards. This follows the publication of a report by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution in 1998 which drew attention to the need to recognise that whilst an EQS is often just viewed as a numerical value, it also has other important characteristics that need to be recognised if it is to be a practical and effective regulatory tool. One of the aspects that has not always been recognised was that of implementation assessment, i.e. the steps needed to ensure that a standard actually delivers environmental benefit or improvements. In many jurisdictions, there is considerable technical and sometimes political emphasis on the numerical value of the EQS (e.g. the critical concentration in an environmental matrix like water), including the method of derivation, the scrutiny of the reliability and relevance of the ecotoxicity test data and extensive deliberations of unquantified uncertainties in relation to the choice of assessment factor. The regulatory value of an EQS only comes through a comparison against a measured environmental concentration, yet only relatively limited regulatory effort has historically been expended on this component of the classic environmental risk assessment paradigm. For example, there needs to be an acceptable (i.e. small) uncertainty in the EQS, an appropriate analytical method and detection limit in the correct matrix, a method to deliver a comparison with the EQS and a robust statistical method to draw unbiased conclusions about environmental risk. In addition, we argue that there is a case for checking the consequences of introducing a standard against field data, wherever possible. This validation of the EQS rarely happens currently. We explain what implementation assessment is and why it is needed. We give examples of how implementation assessment can be integrated with EQS derivation and also present examples of what happens when the focus is only upon the derivation of a numerical value. It is clear from this evidence that advances in derivation methods need to be coupled with practical solutions of implementation if we are to realise environmental benefit from an EQS in a cost-effective manner.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/standards , Environmental Pollution/analysis , Risk Assessment/standards , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , United Kingdom
6.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 13(4): 664-674, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531323

ABSTRACT

A species sensitivity distribution (SSD) is a probability model of the variation of species sensitivities to a stressor, in particular chemical exposure. The SSD approach has been used as a decision support tool in environmental protection and management since the 1980s, and the ecotoxicological, statistical, and regulatory basis and applications continue to evolve. This article summarizes the findings of a 2014 workshop held by the European Centre for Toxicology and Ecotoxicology of Chemicals and the UK Environment Agency in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on the ecological relevance, statistical basis, and regulatory applications of SSDs. An array of research recommendations categorized under the topical areas of use of SSDs, ecological considerations, guideline considerations, method development and validation, toxicity data, mechanistic understanding, and uncertainty were identified and prioritized. A rationale for the most critical research needs identified in the workshop is provided. The workshop reviewed the technical basis and historical development and application of SSDs, described approaches to estimating generic and scenario-specific SSD-based thresholds, evaluated utility and application of SSDs as diagnostic tools, and presented new statistical approaches to formulate SSDs. Collectively, these address many of the research needs to expand and improve their application. The highest priority work, from a pragmatic regulatory point of view, is to develop a guidance of best practices that could act as a basis for global harmonization and discussions regarding the SSD methodology and tools. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:664-674. © 2016 SETAC.


Subject(s)
Aquatic Organisms , Ecotoxicology/methods , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Toxicity Tests/methods , Biota , Conservation of Natural Resources , Ecology , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Netherlands , Risk Assessment/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Toxicity Tests/standards , Uncertainty , Water Pollutants, Chemical
8.
Environ Sci Technol ; 50(1): 3-17, 2016 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26619247

ABSTRACT

We reviewed compliance monitoring requirements in the European Union, the United States, and the Oslo-Paris Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic, and evaluated if these are met by passive sampling methods for nonpolar compounds. The strengths and shortcomings of passive sampling are assessed for water, sediments, and biota. Passive water sampling is a suitable technique for measuring concentrations of freely dissolved compounds. This method yields results that are incompatible with the EU's quality standard definition in terms of total concentrations in water, but this definition has little scientific basis. Insufficient quality control is a present weakness of passive sampling in water. Laboratory performance studies and the development of standardized methods are needed to improve data quality and to encourage the use of passive sampling by commercial laboratories and monitoring agencies. Successful prediction of bioaccumulation based on passive sampling is well documented for organisms at the lower trophic levels, but requires more research for higher levels. Despite the existence of several knowledge gaps, passive sampling presently is the best available technology for chemical monitoring of nonpolar organic compounds. Key issues to be addressed by scientists and environmental managers are outlined.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Organic Chemicals/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Biota , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Organic Chemicals/chemistry
9.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 54(6): 1072-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26215548

ABSTRACT

The surgical reconstruction of Charcot deformity can be a challenge for foot and ankle surgeons. Consensus is lacking among surgeons regarding the best method of surgical fixation to be used in reconstruction, and clear strong evidence is also lacking in published studies. We undertook a systematic review of electronic databases and other relevant sources in an attempt to better understand the complications and outcomes associated with internal and external fixation for Charcot foot and ankle reconstruction. A total of 23 level 4 studies with 616 procedures were identified. Of these, 12 studies with 275 procedures used internal fixation, and 11 studies with 341 procedures used external fixation. The odds of a successful outcome with internal fixation was 6.86. The odds of a successful outcome with external fixation was 13.20 (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.90). The odds of success for internal fixation was 0.52 times as likely as the odds of success with external fixation. Because the odds ratio did not include 1, this difference was statistically significant at the p < .05 level. An identified trend was that external fixation was used more often in cases deemed to be difficult by the surgeon preoperatively. These findings could prove helpful to foot and ankle surgeons when making decisions regarding fixation for Charcot reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint/surgery , Arthropathy, Neurogenic/surgery , Foot/surgery , Fracture Fixation/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Plastic Surgery Procedures
10.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 8(2): 435-55, 2011 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21556195

ABSTRACT

A model-based prioritisation exercise has been carried out for the Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation. The approach considers two aspects: the hazard of a certain chemical and its exposure levels, and focuses on aquatic ecosystems, but also takes into account hazards due to secondary poisoning, bioaccumulation through the food chain and potential human health effects. A list provided by EU Member States, Stakeholders and Non-Governmental Organizations comprising 2,034 substances was evaluated according to hazard and exposure criteria. Then 78 substances classified as "of high concern" where analysed and ranked in terms of risk ratio (Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No-Effect Concentration). This exercise has been complemented by a monitoring-based prioritization exercise using data provided by Member States. The proposed approach constitutes the first step in setting the basis for an open modular screening tool that could be used for the next prioritization exercises foreseen by the WFD.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Water Pollution/prevention & control , Algorithms , Europe , Risk Assessment
11.
J Environ Radioact ; 100(12): 1100-8, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19589629

ABSTRACT

Criteria are needed to be able to judge the level of risk associated with dose rates estimated for non-human biota. In this paper, European guidance on the derivation of predicted no-effect chemical concentrations has been applied to appropriate radiation sensitivity data. A species sensitivity distribution fitted to the data for all species resulted in a generic predicted no-effect dose rate of 10 microGy h(-1).Currently, data are inadequate to derive screening values for separate organism groups. A second, higher, benchmark could aid in decision making by putting results into context on the scale of no effect to a risk of 'serious' effect. The need for, meaning and use of such a value needs to be debated by the wider community. This paper explores potential approaches of deriving scientific input to this debate. The concepts proposed in this paper are broadly consistent with the framework for human protection.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Environmental Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiation, Ionizing , Animals , Birds , Crustacea/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Ecology , Ecosystem , Europe , Mammals , Mollusca/radiation effects , Plants/radiation effects , Risk Assessment
12.
Environ Sci Technol ; 41(14): 5014-21, 2007 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17711217

ABSTRACT

Quality standards (QS) for dissolved metals in freshwaters have been proposed underthe European Water Framework Directive (WFD) and are based mainly upon laboratory ecotoxicity data. Uncertainties remain about laboratory-to-field extrapolation to establish QS that are neither over- nor underprotective. Freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates are a group of organisms of known sensitivity to heavy metals. We analyzed a dataset from England and Wales of dissolved metal concentrations (cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, nickel, lead, and zinc) and associated benthic invertebrate community metrics, using piecewise regression, quantile regression, and information on metal concentrations consistent with good quality status. Analysis of these field data suggests that dissolved metal QS proposed under the WFD are similar to metal concentrations in rivers associated with unimpaired benthic invertebrate assemblages in England and Wales. The only exceptions to this are QS for iron and zinc, where use of relatively large assessment factors leads to standards that are substantially below concentrations associated with impaired invertebrate assemblages in the field.


Subject(s)
Metals/standards , Water Pollutants, Chemical/standards , Metals/chemistry , Reference Standards , Solubility
13.
Environ Sci Technol ; 40(1): 395-401, 2006 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16433377

ABSTRACT

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) are increasingly used to analyze toxicity data but have been criticized for a lack of consistency in data inputs, lack of relevance to the real environment, and a lack of transparency in implementation. This paper shows how the Bayesian approach addresses concerns arising from frequentist SSD estimation. Bayesian methodologies are used to estimate SSDs and compare results obtained with time-dependent (LC50) and time-independent (predicted no observed effect concentration) endpoints for the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Uncertainty in the estimation of each SSD is obtained either in the form of a pointwise percentile confidence interval computed by bootstrap regression or an associated credible interval. We demonstrate that uncertainty in SSD estimation can be reduced by applying a Bayesian approach that incorporates expert knowledge and that use of Bayesian methodology permits estimation of an SSD that is more robust to variations in data. The results suggest that even with sparse data sets theoretical criticisms of the SSD approach can be overcome.


Subject(s)
Chlorpyrifos/toxicity , Insecticides/toxicity , Water Pollutants/toxicity , Animals , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Fishes , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Regression Analysis , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Species Specificity
14.
Ecotoxicology ; 13(5): 399-411, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15462132

ABSTRACT

Legislation designed to regulate effluent discharges is expressed in terms of minimising the risk of harm of that discharge to the environment. Practical implementation is usually based on the control and measurement of a limited number of individual chemicals. However, this is not always effective because of the complex nature of some discharges or the lack of data for some chemicals, preventing the definition of acceptable levels in the environment. Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) clearly has a role in such circumstances because it avoids the need for a comprehensive chemical characterisation of effluent discharges. Several scenarios in which DTA can play a useful role in water quality management under current legislation have been identified. A 'generic' framework for the implementation of bioassays for effluent control is proposed. This provides a number of options in terms of the level of environmental protection afforded and the 'starting point' for a DTA programme (i.e. whether it is based on local measurable impacts on water quality or directed from the outset towards the risk assessment of particular discharges). A DTA programme can be developed that meets both the technical and regulatory requirements of these different scenarios. Guidance on the design of such programmes for different scenarios is provided.


Subject(s)
Environment , Policy Making , Waste Disposal, Fluid/standards , Water Pollution/prevention & control , Animals , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests/standards , United Kingdom
15.
Ecotoxicology ; 13(5): 437-47, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15462135

ABSTRACT

In the UK Direct Toxicity Assessment Programme, carried out in 1998-2000, a series of internationally recognised short-term toxicity test methods for algae, invertebrates and fishes, and rapid methods (ECLOX and Microtox) were used extensively. Abbreviated versions of conventional tests (algal growth inhibition tests, Daphnia magna immobilisation test and the oyster embryo-larval development test) were valuable for toxicity screening of effluent discharges and the identification of causes and sources of toxicity. Rapid methods based on chemiluminescence and bioluminescence were not generally useful in this programme, but may have a role where the rapid test has been shown to be an acceptable surrogate for a standardised test method. A range of quality assurance and control measures were identified. Requirements for quality control/assurance are most stringent when deriving data for characterising the toxic hazards of effluents and monitoring compliance against a toxicity reduction target. Lower quality control/assurance requirements can be applied to discharge screening and the identification of causes and sources of toxicity.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Biological Assay/standards , Water Pollutants/analysis , Water Pollutants/toxicity , Animals , Daphnia , Embryo, Nonmammalian , Eukaryota , Fishes , International Cooperation , Invertebrates , Ostreidae , Quality Control , Research Design , Rivers , United Kingdom
16.
Ecotoxicology ; 13(5): 463-74, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15462137

ABSTRACT

This paper illustrates the use of deterministic and probabilistic approaches to the ecotoxicological risk assessment of effluents through two simple examples taken from the UK Direct Toxicity Assessment Demonstration Programme. In this study, the direct protection objective for the River Esk in Scotland was the prevention of short-term lethal toxicity to invertebrates from exposure to effluent containing insecticides. Both a deterministic and a probabilistic risk characterisation show that such toxicity is very unlikely to occur. The protection objectives for the Lower Tees Estuary were more complex, due to a variety of discharges and potentially sensitive species. A deterministic risk assessment using the most sensitive species suggests that toxicity will be high at all times. In contrast, a probabilistic risk assessment suggests that, although acute toxicity is considerable, it is not likely to occur at all times or affect all species, and discharge scenarios do exist in which acute toxicity could be relatively low. These two case studies illustrate the use of probabilistic risk assessment in achieving more realistic assessments of effluent toxicity through use of all available data.


Subject(s)
Insecticides/analysis , Insecticides/toxicity , Models, Statistical , Water Pollutants/analysis , Water Pollutants/toxicity , Animals , Forecasting , Invertebrates , Lethal Dose 50 , Risk Assessment , Rivers , Scotland , Waste Disposal, Fluid
17.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 101(15): 5692-5, 2004 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15056764

ABSTRACT

The Kusunda people of central Nepal have long been regarded as a relic tribe of South Asia. They are, or were until recently, seminomadic hunter-gatherers, living in jungles and forests, with a language that shows no similarities to surrounding languages. They are often described as shorter and darker than neighboring tribes. Our research indicates that the Kusunda language is a member of the Indo-Pacific family. This is a surprising finding inasmuch as the Indo-Pacific family is located on New Guinea and surrounding islands. The possibility that Kusunda is a remnant of the migration that led to the initial peopling of New Guinea and Australia warrants additional investigation from both a linguistic and genetic perspective.


Subject(s)
Language , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Population Groups , Evolution, Molecular , Genetics, Population , Humans , Indian Ocean , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/ethnology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/genetics , Nepal , Pacific Ocean , Population Groups/ethnology , Population Groups/genetics
18.
Environ Sci Technol ; 37(8): 1609-16, 2003 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12731844

ABSTRACT

Environmental benchmarks have recently been proposed for several steroids including the synthetic steroid, 17alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2). These benchmarks are based on extrapolation from studies involving long-term exposure of various fish species to EE2. One of the critical studies was a complete life-cycle experiment performed with the fathead minnow Pimephales promelas over a 289 day exposure period. The lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) and the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for gonad histology were 4 and 1 ng L(-1) respectively. This was because no testicular tissue could be found in any fish exposed to 4 ng L(-1). In the present paper, the survival and reproduction data from that study are reanalyzed to determine the effects of EE2 on the intrinsic rate of population growth (r = In (lambda)), a parameter of demographic importance. We estimate critical threshold concentrations with respect to r and compare these with those previously derived from conventional toxicity test summaries. Further, we assess the influence of individual variability on threshold estimates using a combination of bootstrap and regression approaches, together with a suite of perturbation analyses. These yield ErC100 values (the concentration estimated to reduce intrinsic growth rate to zero) of 3.11 ng L(-1) (linear model) and 3.41 ng L(-1) (quadratic model), comparable with a maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC) of 2 ng L(-1) for feminization of exposed fish calculated by Laenge et al. Our results indicate that reduction in population growth rate with increasing concentration occurred more through EE2 acting to reduce fertility than survival rates. The significance of these summary statistics when deriving environmental benchmarks for steroid estrogens is discussed in the context of affording protection to populations following long-term exposure.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Cyprinidae/physiology , Estradiol Congeners/toxicity , Ethinyl Estradiol/toxicity , Reproduction/drug effects , Sex Differentiation/drug effects , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Endpoint Determination , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Male , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Population Dynamics , Regression Analysis , Survival
19.
Pest Manag Sci ; 59(5): 512-26, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12741519

ABSTRACT

The use of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for examining chemical impacts has become an important area of debate within the European Union. This paper describes a case study on probabilistic techniques to assess pesticide risks in the UK aquatic environment. The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate both the potential strengths and weaknesses of PRA for assessing pesticides when compared with the conventional deterministic approach, and to examine whether PRA is useful within the European regulatory context. The organophosphate insecticide, chlorpyrifos, was selected as a model compound and toxicity exposure ratios calculated using Monte Carlo analysis and different distributions of spray drift and toxicity values following application to top fruit. Chlorpyrifos is highly toxic to arthropods but less toxic to fishes. Species sensitivity followed a log-normal distribution when fitted to all toxicity data. Toxicity data quantity had little influence on species sensitivity distribution model parameters when n was greater than 10 species. Below this, estimates were less accurate and precise, possibly because of the inclusion of data from many different sources. Estimates of chlorpyrifos exposure derived from the standard spray drift model differed substantially from measurements of chlorpyrifos in European surface waters. When a distribution based on measured concentrations was used in a PRA, the risk of acute fish mortality was low, and the risk of acute arthropod mortality was lower than in other scenarios, although not negligible. If PRA is used to assess pesticides, risk managers need further guidance on how to conduct a PRA and what constitutes 'unacceptable risk' under EC Directive 91/414/EEC, as judgement is required when simple trigger values are no longer used.


Subject(s)
Chlorpyrifos/analysis , Chlorpyrifos/toxicity , Fruit/parasitology , Insecticides/analysis , Insecticides/toxicity , Water Pollutants/analysis , Water Pollutants/toxicity , Animals , Chlorpyrifos/standards , Crustacea/drug effects , Environment , Fishes , Insecta/drug effects , Insecticides/standards , Lethal Dose 50 , Models, Statistical , Mollusca/drug effects , Monte Carlo Method , Risk Assessment/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Assessment/methods , Species Specificity , United Kingdom , Water Pollutants/standards
20.
Water Res ; 37(3): 618-26, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12688696

ABSTRACT

Toxicity to organisms is usually expressed in terms of an observable effect on individuals from which a summary endpoint (such as the NOEC or ECx) is derived for risk assessment and environmental quality standards. However, toxicity evaluated in terms of a demographic endpoint may be more relevant to such regulatory applications. In this paper the effect of toxicity on population growth rate r is explored in tandem with a 'double bootstrap' to incorporate uncertainty. Exemplifying the approach with a set of individualized life table response data obtained for Daphnia magna exposed to zinc sulphate solution, the influence of increasing concentrations is assessed. A demographic-based metric for r, the ErCx (effect on r concentration percentage), is defined to permit alternative population level estimation of a 'safe effect' concentration.


Subject(s)
Life Tables , Models, Theoretical , Risk Assessment , Water Pollutants/toxicity , Animals , Daphnia , Endpoint Determination , Population Dynamics , Toxicity Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL