Improved Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral Rate Utilizing a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Team.

Introduction Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an underutilized resource in patients with ischemic heart disease, despite being a Class IA recommendation. In this study, a multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) team aimed to improve CR referrals by standardizing the ordering process at our hospital system. Method By using a collaborative approach involving the electronic medical record (EMR), medical provider education, and hospital protocols, our two-hospital healthcare system was able to successfully identify barriers to CR referral rates and implement interventions for these barriers. All physicians and medical providers, including ancillary staff, were educated on the EMR order sets to improve compliance by using automated order sets in the EMR. The CR referral order in the EMR included a statement regarding the application of evidence-based medicine, and a computerized provider order entry was included as a reminder to the ordering provider. The use of EMR was monitored monthly by the QI committee. Chi-square test and odds ratios were obtained for statistical analysis. Results Through provider-EMR education and patient education on discharge, CR referral rates significantly improved from 51.2 to 87.1% (p = 0.0001) in a 12-month period. The study included 1,499 patients in total. The improvement was statistically significant regardless of patient gender, race, or insurance coverage. Additionally, subgroup analysis in this study found that prior to standardization of the ordering process, African American patients were significantly less likely to be referred to CR compared to Caucasian patients. (51.2% vs. 41.0%, p=0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of CR referral between Caucasian and African American patients following the intervention (84.0% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.166). Conclusion This study shows that CR is an underutilized resource and that effective QI initiatives may not only increase CR referral rates but also close the gap between racial inequities in referral rates. Future research with multi-center randomized control trials is needed to further enhance its external generalizability to other institutions.

Improved left atrial appendage closure procedural efficiency using radiofrequency transseptal wire system.

OBJECTIVE: The radiofrequency (RF) needle has been shown to improve transseptal puncture efficiency and safety compared to mechanical needles. This study aimed to investigate the use of VersaCross RF transseptal wire system (Baylis Medical) to improve procedural efficiency of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) compared to the standard RF needle-based workflow. METHODS: Eighty-one LAAC procedures using WATCHMAN FLX were retrospectively analyzed comparing the standard RF needle-based workflow to a RF wire-based workflow. Study primary endpoint was time to WATCHMAN device release, and secondary endpoints were transseptal puncture time, LAAC success, fluoroscopy use, and procedural complications. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases using standard RF needle-based workflow were compared to 56 cases using the RF wire-based workflow. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between both groups. LAAC was successful in all patients with no differences in intraprocedural complication rates (p = 0.40). Transseptal puncture time was 1.3 min faster using the RF wire-based workflow compared to the standard RF needle-based workflow (6.5 ± 2.3  vs. 7.8 ± 2.3 min, p = 0.02). Overall, time to final WATCHMAN device release was 4.5 min faster with the RF wire-based workflow compared to the RF needle-based workflow (24.6 ± 5.6 vs. 29.1 ± 9.6 min, p = 0.01). Fluoroscopy time was 21% lower using the RF wire-based workflow (7.6 ± 2.8 vs. 9.6 ± 4.4 min; p = 0.05) and fluoroscopy dose was 67% lower (47.1 ± 35.3 vs. 144.9 ± 156.9 mGy, p = 0.04) and more consistent (F-test, p ˂ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The RF wire-based workflow streamlines LAAC procedures, improving LAAC efficiency and safety by reducing fluoroscopy, device exchanges, and delivery sheath manipulation.

Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Artery Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) are revascularization options for the management of severe carotid disease in asymptomatic patients. We aimed to compare the peri-procedural outcomes of the two modalities. A systematic review of the databases PUBMED, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library was performed. All the studies that reported periprocedural outcomes (within 30 days) in asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients were included in the meta-analysis. Random effects models with inverse-variance weighting were used to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) to compare the outcomes. Fifteen studies (including seven randomized controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 15251 patients were included, out of which 6419 (42%) underwent CAS and 8832 (57.9%) underwent CEA. There was no statistical difference in the primary composite outcome of death/stroke/myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 1.02, 95% CI [0.69-1.51], p 0.93). No difference was found in the secondary outcome of all-cause mortality. CAS was associated with a slightly lower risk of MI and cranial nerve palsy. CAS was associated with a slightly higher risk of stroke with no difference in the occurrence of disabling stroke or ipsilateral stroke. In general terms, the study confirms equipoise in the two treatment strategies with a higher risk of MI and cranial nerve palsy with CEA and a higher risk of non-disabling stroke with CAS.

Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Magnetic Interference by the iPhone 12: Is It Clinically Significant?

The iPhone 12 series (Apple, Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) contains a circular array of magnets around a central charging coil (compatible with "Magsafe" technology). The device was recently reported to have magnetic interference with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). We sought to test the electromagnetic interference of the iPhone 12 in inhibiting life-saving therapies of ICDs in clinical settings. After obtaining written informed consent, an iPhone 12 was placed over the device generators of 17 patients in the ICD clinic. Device interrogation was performed immediately before and after placing the iPhone over the ICD generator to evaluate for any inhibition of device therapies. To emulate a real-world scenario, the iPhone 12 was not placed directly over the skin above the device generator but instead was positioned over the patients' clothes. None of the device interrogations revealed interruption of device therapies due to the iPhone. We concluded that, despite the iPhone having shown in vitro interference of ICD functioning, its effects are not clinically relevant in vivo. Larger studies need to be performed to confirm this finding and guide safety recommendations regarding the use of iPhones containing magnets by patients with implanted ICDs.

Dearth of electrophysiology fellows: perspectives from cardiology fellows-in-training.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 6 years, there has been a high percentage of unfilled cardiac electrophysiology (EP) training spots each year. The authors aimed to investigate potential explanations for the unfilled positions based on a survey from the current Fellows-In-Training (FITs). METHODS: An attempt was made to reach the current cardiology FITs across all programs of the U.S. via email. An anonymous questionnaire was created consisting of 14 questions. Questions posed were regarding factors affecting each participant's interest in or lack of pursuing an EP fellowship. Descriptive statistics of the responses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 26% (35/134) respondents expressed their interest in applying to an EP fellowship. The most common reasons to apply to EP were: Interest in EP, procedural specialty, and work-life balance. Of the 99 respondents that were not applying to EP, the most common reasons not to apply were: Less interest in EP, two-year training duration, and complexity of the specialty. The top reasons for the fellows to believe there is a dearth of EP FITs were: two-year training duration, lack of interest in EP, and the complexity of the specialty. The changes that would encourage EP fellowship interest were: More exposure to EP training during general cardiology fellowship, shortening the EP training duration, and having more information available regarding employment opportunities. CONCLUSION: The study was able to identify factors responsible for vacancies in EP fellowship positions from the view of current cardiology FITs. Stakeholders at the national level involved in framing policies related to fellowship education would be able to utilize this information to address the shortage of EP FITs and increase recruitment to EP fellowships.

Rate Control Versus Rhythm Control in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) with no defined guideline treatment strategy of rate versus rhythm control. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of rate versus rhythm control for AF on the outcomes of patients with LVAD at our institution. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation at St Vincent Hospital from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with AF were identified and divided into rate control or rhythm control groups. The primary outcome evaluated was a composite of death, heart failure admission, gastrointestinal bleed, ventricular tachycardia, cerebrovascular accident, hemolysis, and pump thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included the individual variables from the primary outcome. RESULTS: Out of 201 patients that underwent LVAD implantation, 81 had AF after implantation and were included with a median follow-up period of 384 days. The rate control group (n = 31; 38%) and the rhythm control group (n = 51; 62%) had no difference in composite outcomes (61% vs 59%, p = 0.83). When taken individually there was no difference in outcomes between the two groups. Thirteen patients underwent electrical cardioversion and successful conversion to normal sinus rhythm occurred in 71% of cases with a 60% recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in primary outcome between rate and rhythm control groups. These data suggest that maintenance of sinus rhythm may not be necessary in all patients with LVAD.