ABSTRACT
AIM: Studies have demonstrated a relationship between lymph node (LN) yield and survival after colectomy for cancer. The impact of surgical technique on LN yield has not been well explored. METHOD: This is a retrospective study of right colectomy (RC) for cancer at a single institution from 2012 to 2014. Exclusion criteria were previous colectomy and emergent and palliative operations. All data were collected by chart review. Primary outcomes were LN yield and the LN to length of surgical specimen (LN-LSS) ratio. Multivariable mixed models were created with surgeon and pathologist as random effects. Sensitivity analyses were performed to exclude Stage IV cancers and to analyse groups on an 'as-treated' basis. RESULTS: We identified 181 open (O-RC), 163 laparoscopic (L-RC) and 119 robotic (R-RC) right colectomies. O-RC was more commonly performed in women with metastatic disease. The mean LN yield was 28, 29 and 34 in O-RC, L-RC and R-RC, respectively; the respective mean LN-LSS ratios were 0.83, 0.91 and 1.0. The R-RC approach produced a higher LN yield than the other approaches (P < 0.01), and a higher LN-LSS ratio than O-RC (P < 0.01). These findings were unchanged in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Robotic right colectomy improves LN yield and the LN-LSS ratio, which may reflect better mesocolic excision. The effect of these findings on survival requires further investigation.
Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Male , Mesocolon/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication after colectomy, with impacts on both health care utilization and quality of life. The true incidence of IH after minimally invasive colectomy is not well described. The purpose of this study was to examine IH incidence after minimally invasive right colectomies (RC) and to compare the IH rates after laparoscopic (L-RC) and robotic (R-RC) colectomies. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing minimally invasive RC at a single institution from 2009 to 2014. Only patients undergoing RC for colonic neoplasia were included. Patients with previous colectomy or intraperitoneal chemotherapy were excluded. Three L-RC patients were included for each R-RC patient. The primary outcome was IH rate based on clinical examination or computed tomography (CT). Univariate and multivariate time-to-event analyses were used to assess predictors of IH. RESULTS: 276 patients where included, of which 69 had undergone R-RC and 207 L-RC. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar between the groups, except for higher tumor stage in L-RC patients. Both the median time to diagnosis (9.2 months) and the overall IH rate were similar between the groups (17.4 % for R-RC and 22.2 % for L-RC), as were all other postoperative complications. In multivariable analyses, the only significant predictor of IH was former or current tobacco use (hazard raio 3.0, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the incidence of IH is high after minimally invasive colectomy and that this rate is equivalent after R-RC and L-RC. Reducing the IH rate represents an important opportunity for improving quality of life and reducing health care utilization after minimally invasive colectomy.
