Analysis of an Australian death database of people with intellectual disability living out of the family home: Place of death and associated variables.

This study reports on a five-year data set about the deaths of 599 individuals in New South Wales Australia, who at the time of their death were living in out-of-home care. Analysis aimed to: i) gain a clearer understanding of place of death for people with intellectual disability; and ii) identify and analyse associated variables to investigate how well they predict place of death for this population. Hospital admissions, polypharmacy and living situation were the strongest standalone predictors of place of death. A hospital death was more likely if the target population were subject to polypharmacy, lived in a group home, had a moderate intellectual disability or had GORD. Death, and place of death, is an issue requiring individual consideration. This study has identified some of the variables that need attention when supporting people with intellectual disability to have a good death.

Does talking about end of life with adults with intellectual disability cause emotional discomfort or psychological harm?

BACKGROUND: Caregivers often avoid involving people with intellectual disability in end-of-life discussions and activities. One reason is fear that the person may become upset or psychologically harmed. METHODS: Pre and post a 6-month intervention about end of life, we assessed depression, anxiety, and fear of death among intervention (n = 24) and comparison (n = 20) participants with intellectual disability. End-of-life 'encounters' (conversations/activities about end of life) were monitored, including comfort ratings. RESULTS: Overall, 79% of encounters were rated very comfortable/somewhat comfortable. Participants initiated 69% of encounters. There was no significant pre-post change in depression or fear of death. Anxiety improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first controlled, longitudinal study providing robust evidence about whether discussing end of life leads to emotional discomfort or psychological harm. Data showed adults with intellectual disability can safely engage in conversations/activities about end of life. The high percentage of participant-initiated encounters showed participants wanted to talk about end of life.

The experience of mothers supporting self-determination of adult sons and daughters with intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: The right of people with disability to be self-determining, to live a life of their choosing, is increasingly recognized and promoted. For adults with intellectual disability, support to enable self-determination may be required. This is often provided by family, yet little is understood about the experience of providing such support. METHODS: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of eight individual, semi-structured interviews with mothers was conducted, to understand the meaning given to their experience of supporting self-determination of their adult son or daughter with intellectual disability. RESULTS: Three superordinate themes were identified: (a) support context; (b) continuum of support roles; and (c) mother's personal concerns. CONCLUSION: Mothers of adults with intellectual disability experience an ongoing sense of responsibility to balance competing rights and concerns as they support self-determination. This complex, interdependent relationship results in roles that may facilitate, guide, influence and at times restrict choice and control.

Choice and Control Within Family Relationships: The Lived Experience of Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Increased choice and control is a driving force of current disability policy in Australia for people with disability and their families. Yet little is known of how adults with intellectual disability (ID) actually experience choice and control within their family relationships. We used interpretative phenomenological analysis of individual, semistructured interviews conducted with 8 Australian adults with ID to understand the meaning given to their experience of family support received around choice and decision making. Three themes were identified: (1) centrality of family, (2) experience of self-determination, and (3) limitations to choice and control. The participants identified trusted family members from whom guidance around choice and decision making was both sought and received, often involving mutual decision making and limitations to control.

Knowing, planning for and fearing death: Do adults with intellectual disability and disability staff differ?

BACKGROUND: Adults with intellectual disability (ID) are thought to understand less about death than the general population but there is no available research demonstrating this. Further, the detail of any possible differences in understanding is unknown. METHODS: We compared the responses of 39 adults with mild or moderate ID and 40 disability staff (representing the general population) on (a) understanding the concept of death, (b) knowledge of and self-determination about end-of-life planning, and (c) fear-of-death. RESULTS: We found that adults with ID had a significantly poorer understanding of the concept of death, knew much less about and were less self-determined about end-of-life planning, but reported greater fear-of-death. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated, for the first time, the feasibility of assessing end-of-life planning and fear-of-death among adults with ID. The poorer understanding and lower levels of self-determination we found suggest that future research should develop and evaluate interventions to increase understanding and self-determination.