ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We wanted to determine the diagnostic value of an oral prednisolone test for chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three patients with cough for longer than 14 days, without known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, participated in a diagnostic study in Dutch primary care between 2006 and 2009. These patients used a 14-day prednisolone test of 30 mg/d and recorded before-after bronchodilator measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). An expert panel determined the presence or absence of COPD and asthma based on an extensive diagnostic workup. The proportion of responders to the prednisolone test (increased FEV(1) exceeding 200 mL or 12% of baseline) per diagnosis group was compared, and the diagnostic value of the test was quantified by logistic regression and analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC area). RESULTS: In patients with COPD, 23% (14 of 61) responded to the test; in patients with asthma 4% (1 of 25) responded; in patients with asthma and COPD, 7% (1 of 14) responded; and in those without asthma or COPD, 11% (14 of 133) responded. Being a responder was, unexpectedly, associated with COPD (OR = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.2). After multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex, and smoking, the OR = 2.0 (95% CI, 0.8-5.0) and the ROC area did not increase (0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85 vs 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85). CONCLUSION: A response to a prednisolone test was suggestive of COPD, but added no diagnostic value to more easily obtainable characteristics.
Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnosis , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Administration, Oral , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Forced Expiratory Volume , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , ROC Curve , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
This study examined quality of life (QOL) and illness perceptions in Dutch and Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, thereby extending the body of knowledge on cultural differences and psychosocial aspects of this illness. 24 Dutch and 22 Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer filled out questionnaires on three occasions: immediately before chemotherapy, 1 week later, and 8 weeks after the initial chemotherapy. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) assessed QOL, and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) illness perceptions. Scores on several QOL measures indicated (a) major impact of first chemotherapy sessions, and (b) some tendency to returning to baseline measures at 8 weeks. Differences between Japanese and Dutch samples were found on five EORTC QLQ-C30 dimensions: global health status, emotional functioning, social functioning, constipation, and financial difficulties, with the Dutch patients reporting more favorable scores. Regarding illness perceptions, Japanese patients had higher means on perceived treatment control and personal control, expressing a higher sense of belief in the success of medical treatment than Dutch patients. In both Japanese and Dutch patients, impact of chemotherapy on QOL was evident. Some differences in illness perceptions and QOL between the two samples were observed, with implications for integral medical management. Both samples reported illness perceptions that reflect the major consequences of non-small-cell lung cancer. Incorporating symptom reports, illness perceptions, and QOL into medical management may have positive consequences for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
