ABSTRACT
Since 1999, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of AIDS (NIAID DAIDS) has funded the Immunology Quality Assessment (IQA) Program with the goal of assessing proficiency in basic lymphocyte subset immunophenotyping for each North American laboratory supporting the NIAID DAIDS HIV clinical trial networks. Further, the purpose of this program is to facilitate an increase in the consistency of interlaboratory T-cell subset measurement (CD3(+)4(+)/CD3(+)8(+) percentages and absolute counts) and likewise, a decrease in intralaboratory variability. IQA T-cell subset measurement proficiency testing was performed over a ten-year period (January 2003-July 2012), and the results were analyzed via longitudinal analysis using mixed effects models. The goal of this analysis was to describe how a typical laboratory (a statistical modeling construct) participating in the IQA Program performed over time. Specifically, these models were utilized to examine trends in interlaboratory agreement, as well as successful passing of proficiency testing. Intralaboratory variability (i.e., precision) was determined by the repeated measures variance, while fixed and random effects were taken into account for changes in interlaboratory agreement (i.e., accuracy) over time. A flow cytometer (single-platform technology, SPT) or a flow cytometer/hematology analyzer (dual-platform technology, DPT) was also examined as a factor for accuracy and precision. The principal finding of this analysis was a significant (p<0.001) increase in accuracy of T-cell subset measurements over time, regardless of technology type (SPT or DPT). Greater precision was found in SPT measurements of all T-cell subset measurements (p<0.001), as well as greater accuracy of SPT on CD3(+)4(+)% and CD3(+)8(+)% assessments (p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively). However, the interlaboratory random effects variance in DPT results indicates that for some cases DPT can have increased accuracy compared to SPT. Overall, these findings demonstrate that proficiency in and among IQA laboratories have, in general, improved over time and that platform type differences in performance do exist.
Subject(s)
CD3 Complex/blood , CD4 Lymphocyte Count/standards , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Immunophenotyping/standards , Laboratories/standards , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/standards , Monitoring, Immunologic/standards , Biomarkers/blood , CD4 Lymphocyte Count/statistics & numerical data , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/virology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/virology , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Flow Cytometry/standards , Guideline Adherence/standards , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Immunophenotyping/statistics & numerical data , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Monitoring, Immunologic/statistics & numerical data , Observer Variation , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Quality Control , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen Handling/standards , Time Factors , WorkflowABSTRACT
We evaluated the effect of specimen processing variations and quantitation methods on quantitative determination of CD38 expression on CD8 T lymphocytes. Neither lysing reagent (ammonium chloride versus BD FACSlyse), fixation (paraformaldehyde versus no final fixation step), nor acquisition delay (acquisition within 6 h after fixation versus 24 h after fixation) had a significant effect on CD38 relative fluorescent intensity or CD38 quantitative estimates (RFI or antibodies bound per cell). The only significant difference in fluorescent intensity and CD38 antibodies bound per cell (ABC) was encountered when whole blood was held for 24 h prior to staining and fixation and then acquired after another 24-h hold. However, for all sample processing methods above, the CD4 biologic calibrator and QuantiBRITE bead methods gave significantly different estimates of CD38 intensity. In many cases, however, these differences are relatively small and were more pronounced in certain laboratories. We conclude that there is some flexibility in sample processing methods for quantitative CD38 determination; however, it is preferable for a laboratory to employ one method of fluorescence quantitation calculation consistently because small differences are detected between different methods. Cytometry (Comm. Clin. Cytometry) 42:174-179, 2000.
Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/analysis , Antigens, Differentiation/analysis , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Flow Cytometry/methods , NAD+ Nucleosidase/analysis , ADP-ribosyl Cyclase , ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1 , Antibodies, Monoclonal/analysis , Antigens, CD/immunology , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Laboratories/standards , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Membrane Glycoproteins , Specimen Handling , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time FactorsABSTRACT
A single-platform technology that uses an internal bead standard and three-color flow cytometry to determine CD4 and CD8 absolute counts was evaluated for reproducibility and agreement. Values obtained using TruCount absolute-count tubes were compared to those obtained using a two-color predicate methodology. Sixty specimens from human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected donors were shipped to five laboratories. Each site also analyzed replicates of 14 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected local specimens at 6 h and again at 24 h. The interlaboratory variability was significantly less with TruCount (median difference in percent coefficient of variation [%CV] between the two methods was -8% and -3% for CD4 and CD8, respectively) than with the predicate method. Intralaboratory variability was smaller, with a median difference in %CV of -1% for both CD4 and CD8 with 6-h samples and -2% and -3% for CD4 and CD8, respectively, with 24-h samples. Use of TruCount for shipped samples resulted in a median CD4 count change of 7 cells (50th estimated percentile) when all laboratories and CD4 strata were combined. For on-site samples, the median CD4 count change was 10 CD4 cells for 6-h samples and 2 CD4 cells for 24-h samples. Individual site biases occurred in both directions and cancelled each other when the data were combined for all laboratories. Thus, the combined data showed a smaller change in median CD4 count than what may have occurred at an individual site. In summary, the use of TruCount decreased both the inter- and intralaboratory variability in determining absolute CD4 and CD8 counts.
Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , CD4-CD8 Ratio/methods , Flow Cytometry/methods , HIV-1 , Adult , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Flow Cytometry/standards , Hematology/methods , Hematology/standards , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen HandlingABSTRACT
New analytic methods that permit absolute CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations to be performed entirely on the flow cytometer have the potential for improving assay precision and accuracy. In a multisite trial, we compared two different single-platform assay methods with a predicate two-color assay in which the absolute lymphocyte count was derived by conventional hematology. A two-color method employing lymphocyte light scatter gating and Beckman Coulter Flow-Count fluorospheres for absolute counting produced within-laboratory precision equivalent to that of the two-color predicate method, as measured by coefficient of variation of replicate measurements. The fully automated Beckman Coulter tetraONE System four-color assay employing CD45 lymphocyte gating, automated analysis, and absolute counting by fluorospheres resulted in a small but significant improvement in the within-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 cell counts and percentages suggesting that the CD45 lymphocyte gating and automated analysis might have contributed to the improved performance. Both the two-color method employing Flow-Count fluorospheres and the four-color tetraONE System provided significant and substantial improvements in between-laboratory precision of absolute counts. In some laboratories, absolute counts obtained by the single-platform methods showed small but consistent differences relative to the predicate method. Comparison of each laboratory's absolute counts with the five-laboratory median value suggested that these differences resulted from a bias in the absolute lymphocyte count obtained from the hematology instrument in some laboratories. These results demonstrate the potential for single-platform assay methods to improve within-laboratory and between-laboratory precision of CD4 and CD8 T-cell determinations compared with conventional assay methods.
Subject(s)
CD4-CD8 Ratio/instrumentation , CD4-CD8 Ratio/methods , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Flow Cytometry/methods , Flow Cytometry/standards , Humans , Immunophenotyping/instrumentation , Immunophenotyping/methods , Immunophenotyping/standards , Laboratories/standards , Leukocyte Common Antigens/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen HandlingABSTRACT
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection results in impaired immune function that can be measured by changes in immunophenotypically defined lymphocyte subsets and other in vitro functional assays. These in vitro assays may also serve as early indicators of efficacy when new therapeutic strategies for HIV-1 infection are being evaluated. However, the use of in vitro assays of immune function in multicenter clinical trials has been hindered by their need to be performed on fresh specimens. We assessed the feasibility of using cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) for lymphocyte immunophenotyping and for lymphocyte proliferation at nine laboratories. In HIV-1-infected patients with moderate CD4(+) lymphocyte loss, the procedures of density gradient isolation, cryopreservation, and thawing of PBMC resulted in significant loss of CD19(+) B cells but no measurable loss of total T cells or CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells. No significant changes were seen in CD28(-) CD95(+) lymphocytes after cell isolation and cryopreservation. However, small decreases in HLA-DR(+) CD38(+) lymphocytes and of CD45RA(+) CD62L(+) were observed within both the CD4(+) and CD8(+) subsets. Fewer than 10% of those specimens that showed positive PBMC proliferative responses to mitogens or microbial antigens lost their responsiveness after cryopreservation. These results support the feasibility of cryopreserving PBMC for immunophenotyping and functional testing in multicenter AIDS clinical trials. However, small changes in selected lymphocyte subsets that may occur after PBMC isolation and cryopreservation will need to be assessed and considered in the design of each clinical trial.