ABSTRACT
This study assessed the effects of dexamethasone treatment on farrowing performance and piglet traits in the first 5 days of life in multiparous sows, a high-risk group for stillbirths and prolonged farrowing. In this study, 185 multiparous sows (parity 4.25 ± 0.14) were selected on the day of farrowing and divided into three treatments: CON - control, without dexamethasone treatment; DexaPF - treatment with dexamethasone (20 mg im per female) at the time of copious colostrum secretion (pre-farrowing); and DexaFO - treatment with dexamethasone (20 mg im per female) when the first piglet was born (farrowing onset). All sows and their litters were monitored for farrowing duration, obstetric interventions, colostrum yield and intake, newborn piglet traits, and piglet performance until 5 d of age. A subsample of 106 females (â¼35 per treatment) had their blood glucose concentration checked hourly shortly after the first piglet was born until the end of farrowing. Additionally, blood samples from 42 litters were collected for immunocrit evaluation. The results showed no differences regarding farrowing duration (CON = 258.02 ± 13.81 min; DexaPF = 251.29 ± 13.60 min; DexaFO = 294.92 ± 13.89 min; P = 0.06) and obstetric intervention rates among treatments (CON = 36.58 ± 6.78 %; DexaPF = 42.16 ± 6.89 %; DexaFO = 48.05 ± 7.08 %; P = 0.45). The blood glucose concentration during farrowing was higher in DexaPF (94.56 ± 1.57 mg/dL; P < 0.001) than in CON (73.50 ± 1.72 mg/dL) and DexaFO (87.94 ± 1.80 mg/dL). No differences were observed regarding total piglets born and born alive, stillborn, newborn piglet vitality, colostrum intake, immunocrit, colostrum yield, and glycemia and rectal temperature at 24 h of age (P ≥ 0.13). Regarding meconium staining, higher percentages of piglets born without meconium staining were observed in DexaFO (54.77 ± 5.21 %; P = 0.02) compared with CON (48.58 ± 5.26 %), and no difference was observed for the DexaPF group (53.23 ± 5.21 %). In addition, a higher unbroken umbilical cord rate was observed in DexaFO (92.41 ± 1.31 %; P < 0.01) than the CON or DexaPF (86.91 ± 1.97 % and 89.31 ± 1.67 %, respectively). However, the treatments did not affect piglet performance (weight gain and survival) until 5 d of age (P ≥ 0.15). In summary, dexamethasone treatment in periparturient multiparous sows did not improve farrowing performance and key production parameters, such as the piglet weight gain and survival up to 5 d of age.
Subject(s)
Animals, Newborn , Dexamethasone , Animals , Female , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Swine/physiology , Pregnancy , Parity , Parturition/drug effects , Peripartum Period , Colostrum/chemistryABSTRACT
This study evaluated the relationship between the steroidal anti-inflammatory action of dexamethasone treatment in primiparous sows and farrowing and piglet performance in the first 5 d of life. For this purpose, 234 gilts were selected on the day of farrowing and distributed among three treatments: CON - control, without dexamethasone treatment; DexaPF - treatment with dexamethasone (20 mg im) per female at the moment of copious colostrum secretion (pre-farrowing); and DexaFO - treatment with dexamethasone (20 mg im), per female when the first piglet was born (farrowing onset). All females and their litters were evaluated regarding farrowing duration, obstetric interventions, colostrum yield and intake, newborn piglet traits, and piglet performance until 5 d of age. A subsample of 79 females (â¼26 per treatment) had their blood glucose concentration evaluated hourly shortly after the first piglet was born until the end of farrowing. Additionally, blood samples from 11 litters per treatment were collected for immunocrit evaluation. As a result, faster farrowing was observed in the DexaPF treatment (188.14 min; P = 0.002) compared with CON (229.99 min) and DexaFO (221.79 min). Additionally, lower obstetric intervention rates were observed in sows treated with dexamethasone (DexaPF = 7.69%; DexaFO = 5.13%) compared with CON (19.23%; P = 0.02). The sow's blood glucose concentration during farrowing was higher in DexaPF (90.55 mg/dL) than in CON (73.15 mg/dL) and DexaFO (80.06 mg/dL) treatments (P < 0.01). Besides the effect on farrowing duration, no differences among treatments were observed regarding piglets born alive and stillbirths, newborn piglet vitality, colostrum consumption, immunocrit, and colostrum yield (P ≥ 0.17). Regarding piglet traits, higher percentages of piglets born without meconium staining and lower percentages of piglets with meconium scores 2 and 3 were observed in the groups treated with dexamethasone (DexaPF and DexaFO; P < 0.01) compared with CON. However, piglet weight gain and survival rate until 5 d of age were not affected by the treatment (P ≥ 0.61). In summary, dexamethasone treatment before farrowing onset, in primiparous sows, had the potential to reduce the farrowing duration and the necessity of obstetric intervention, but it did not affect the main productive parameters such as the occurrence of stillbirths, piglet weight gain, and survival rates until 5 d of age.
Subject(s)
Stillbirth , Swine Diseases , Pregnancy , Animals , Swine , Female , Animals, Newborn , Stillbirth/veterinary , Blood Glucose , Parturition , Colostrum , Sus scrofa , Weight Gain , Dexamethasone , LactationABSTRACT
This study evaluated the effect of different single fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols on gestation length, farrowing distribution (synchrony), and piglet performance. In Study 1, 866 sows were assigned to two groups: Multiple AI (n = 484) - multiple artificial insemination (AI) at 24 h intervals during estrus; and FTAI+MultAI (n = 382) - OvuGel® 96 h post-weaning and single FTAI 22-24 h later. In Study 2, FTAI protocols were retrospectively analyzed: pLH - sows received 2.5 mg (Exp.1, n = 184) or 5 mg (Exp.2, n = 362) of porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) at estrus onset, and single FTAI 24 h later. The FTAI+MultAI resulted in shorter gestation length (P < 0.01) and greater synchrony of farrowing on days 114-115 of gestation (P < 0.01) than Multiple AI. Longer lactation length (21.2 vs. 20.9 d; P = 0.02) and greater piglet weaning weight (5378.9 ± 73.1 vs. 5153.2 ± 74.4 g; P = 0.03) for FTAI+MultAI compared to Multiple AI were observed. In Study 2, the gestation length based on the first AI record was shorter for FTAI and resulted in greater synchrony of farrowing on days 114-115 of gestation, compared with Multiple AI (P ≤ 0.05). Gestation length did not differ between groups (P > 0.05) when measured based on most probable AI responsible for fertilization (ultrasound evaluation). In conclusion, FTAI resulted in shorter gestation length and greater farrowing synchrony compared with Multiple AI. Longer lactation length and greater piglet weaning weight were observed for FTAI compared with multiple insemination protocols.
Subject(s)
Estrus , Insemination, Artificial , Swine , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , Weaning , Retrospective Studies , Insemination, Artificial/veterinary , Insemination, Artificial/methods , Lactation , Luteinizing Hormone/pharmacologyABSTRACT
This study evaluated the applicability of intrauterine artificial insemination (IUAI) in gilts and the impact of age at insemination and different body characteristics of gilts on the success rate for cannula insertion. Additionally, reproductive performance was evaluated for IUAI and cervical artificial insemination (CAI), considering different semen dose sizes. A total of 636 gilts were assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design: two artificial insemination techniques (CAI and IUAI) and two semen dose sizes (1.5 × 109 sperm cells/50 mL or 2.5 × 109 sperm cells/80 mL). In those gilts assigned to IUAI (n = 319) the success rate for intrauterine cannula insertion was evaluated according to weight at first detected estrus, body condition score (BCS), and age at insemination. Reproductive performance, occurrence of bleeding, and semen backflow during all inseminations were compared among groups (2 × 2). Two subgroups were evaluated regarding the time expended to perform insemination (n = 380), and the semen backflow collected during 1 h after insemination (n = 114). The success rate for intrauterine cannula insertion, based on a successful insertion in all inseminations performed during estrus, was 58.9%. Additionally, greater possibility (>60%; P ≤ 0.04) of cannula insertion was observed in heavier gilts (≥124 kg), as well as in older gilts (≥225 d) and those with greater BCS (>3). There were no differences among the groups in pregnancy rate (≥95.3%; P = 0.23), farrowing rate (≥93.7%; P = 0.54), total piglets born (≥14.5; P = 0.45), as well as, bleeding (P = 0.48) and backflow (P = 0.48) during insemination. However, the percentage of semen backflow volume and percentage of sperm cells in the backflow were lower in gilts inseminated by CAI with 1.5 billion sperm cells/50 mL (P < 0.01) than in the other groups. There was no expressive reduction in time expended to perform IUAI compared to CAI. However, gilts inseminated with 1.5 billion sperm cells/50 mL showed a lower total time to inseminate than all other groups (P < 0.01). In conclusion, higher weight, BCS, and age increased the success rate for cannula insertion. However, IUAI did not optimize the insemination procedure, and remains limited for gilts due to the low success rate for cannula insertion. Reproductive performance was not affected by IUAI or CAI using 1.5 or 2.5 billion sperm cells in 50 or 80 mL, respectively, suggesting the possibility of using CAI with 1.5 billion sperm cells/50 mL in gilts.