A one-year pilot study comparing direct-infusion high resolution mass spectrometry based untargeted metabolomics to targeted diagnostic screening for inherited metabolic diseases.

Background: Early diagnosis of inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) is important because treatment may lead to reduced mortality and improved prognosis. Due to their diversity, it is a challenge to diagnose IMDs in time, effecting an emerging need for a comprehensive test to acquire an overview of metabolite status. Untargeted metabolomics has proven its clinical potential in diagnosing IMDs, but is not yet widely used in genetic metabolic laboratories. Methods: We assessed the potential role of plasma untargeted metabolomics in a clinical diagnostic setting by using direct infusion high resolution mass spectrometry (DI-HRMS) in parallel with traditional targeted metabolite assays. We compared quantitative data and qualitative performance of targeted versus untargeted metabolomics in patients suspected of an IMD (n = 793 samples) referred to our laboratory for 1 year. To compare results of both approaches, the untargeted data was limited to polar metabolites that were analyzed in targeted plasma assays. These include amino acid, (acyl)carnitine and creatine metabolites and are suitable for diagnosing IMDs across many of the disease groups described in the international classification of inherited metabolic disorders (ICIMD). Results: For the majority of metabolites, the concentrations as measured in targeted assays correlated strongly with the semi quantitative Z-scores determined with DI-HRMS. For 64/793 patients, targeted assays showed an abnormal metabolite profile possibly indicative of an IMD. In 55 of these patients, similar aberrations were found with DI-HRMS. The remaining 9 patients showed only marginally increased or decreased metabolite concentrations that, in retrospect, were most likely to be clinically irrelevant. Illustrating its potential, DI-HRMS detected additional patients with aberrant metabolites that were indicative of an IMD not detected by targeted plasma analysis, such as purine and pyrimidine disorders and a carnitine synthesis disorder. Conclusion: This one-year pilot study showed that DI-HRMS untargeted metabolomics can be used as a first-tier approach replacing targeted assays of amino acid, acylcarnitine and creatine metabolites with ample opportunities to expand. Using DI-HRMS untargeted metabolomics as a first-tier will open up possibilities to look for new biomarkers.

Aspartylglycosamine is a biomarker for NGLY1-CDDG, a congenital disorder of deglycosylation.

BACKGROUND: NGLY1-CDDG is a congenital disorder of deglycosylation caused by a defective peptide:N-glycanase (PNG). To date, all but one of the reported patients have been diagnosed through whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, as no biochemical marker was available to identify this disease in patients. Recently, a potential urinary biomarker was reported, but the data presented suggest that this marker may be excreted intermittently. METHODS: In this study, we performed untargeted direct-infusion high-resolution mass spectrometry metabolomics in seven dried blood spots (DBS) from four recently diagnosed NGLY1-CDDG patients, to test for small-molecule biomarkers, in order to identify a potential diagnostic marker. Results were compared to 125 DBS of healthy controls and to 238 DBS of patients with other diseases. RESULTS: We identified aspartylglycosamine as the only significantly increased compound with a median Z-score of 4.8 (range: 3.8-8.5) in DBS of NGLY1-CDDG patients, compared to a median Z-score of -0.1 (range: -2.1-4.0) in DBS of healthy controls and patients with other diseases. DISCUSSION: The increase of aspartylglycosamine can be explained by lack of function of PNG. PNG catalyzes the cleavage of the proximal N-acetylglucosamine residue of an N-glycan from the asparagine residue of a protein, a step in the degradation of misfolded glycoproteins. PNG deficiency results in a single N-acetylglucosamine residue left attached to the asparagine residue which results in free aspartylglycosamine when the glycoprotein is degraded. Thus, we here identified aspartylglycosamine as the first potential small-molecule biomarker in DBS for NGLY1-CDDG, making a biochemical diagnosis for NGLY1-CDDG potentially feasible.

Activity of N-acylneuraminate-9-phosphatase (NANP) is not essential for de novo sialic acid biosynthesis.

BACKGROUND: Sialylation of glycoproteins and glycolipids is important for biological processes such as cellular communication, cell migration and protein function. Biosynthesis of CMP-sialic acid, the essential substrate, comprises five enzymatic steps, involving ManNAc and sialic acid and their phosphorylated forms as intermediates. Genetic diseases in this pathway result in different and tissue-restricted phenotypes, which is poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: We aimed to study the mechanisms of sialic acid metabolism in knockouts (KO) of the sialic acid pathway in two independent cell lines. Sialylation of cell surface glycans was reduced by KO of GNE (UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase), NANS (sialic acid synthase) and CMAS (N-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase) genes, but was largely unaffected in NANP (N-acylneuraminate-9-phosphatase) KO, as studied by MAA and PNA lectin binding. NANP is the third enzyme in sialic acid biosynthesis and dephosphorylates sialic acid 9-phosphate to free sialic acid. LC-MS analysis of sialic acid metabolites showed that CMP-sialic acid was dramatically reduced in GNE and NANS KO cells and undetectable in CMAS KO. In agreement with normal cell surface sialylation, CMP-sialic acid levels in NANP KO were comparable to WT cells, even though sialic acid 9-phosphate, the substrate of NANP accumulated. Metabolic flux analysis with 13C6-labelled ManNAc showed a lower, but significant conversion of ManNAc into sialic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that NANP activity is not essential for de novo sialic acid production and point towards an alternative phosphatase activity, bypassing NANP. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: This report contributes to a better understanding of sialic acid biosynthesis in humans.

Mutations in N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase in patients with X-linked intellectual disability.

N-Acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) regulates protein O-GlcNAcylation, an essential and dynamic post-translational modification. The O-GlcNAc modification is present on numerous nuclear and cytosolic proteins and has been implicated in essential cellular functions such as signaling and gene expression. Accordingly, altered levels of protein O-GlcNAcylation have been associated with developmental defects and neurodegeneration. However, mutations in the OGT gene have not yet been functionally confirmed in humans. Here, we report on two hemizygous mutations in OGT in individuals with X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) and dysmorphic features: one missense mutation (p.Arg284Pro) and one mutation leading to a splicing defect (c.463-6T>G). Both mutations reside in the tetratricopeptide repeats of OGT that are essential for substrate recognition. We observed slightly reduced levels of OGT protein and reduced levels of its opposing enzyme O-GlcNAcase in both patient-derived fibroblasts, but global O-GlcNAc levels appeared to be unaffected. Our data suggest that mutant cells attempt to maintain global O-GlcNAcylation by down-regulating O-GlcNAcase expression. We also found that the c.463-6T>G mutation leads to aberrant mRNA splicing, but no stable truncated protein was detected in the corresponding patient-derived fibroblasts. Recombinant OGT bearing the p.Arg284Pro mutation was prone to unfolding and exhibited reduced glycosylation activity against a complex array of glycosylation substrates and proteolytic processing of the transcription factor host cell factor 1, which is also encoded by an XLID-associated gene. We conclude that defects in O-GlcNAc homeostasis and host cell factor 1 proteolysis may play roles in mediation of XLID in individuals with OGT mutations.

Genetic defects in the hexosamine and sialic acid biosynthesis pathway.

BACKGROUND: Congenital disorders of glycosylation are caused by defects in the glycosylation of proteins and lipids. Classically, gene defects with multisystem disease have been identified in the ubiquitously expressed glycosyltransferases required for protein N-glycosylation. An increasing number of defects are being described in sugar supply pathways for protein glycosylation with tissue-restricted clinical symptoms. SCOPE OF REVIEW: In this review, we address the hexosamine and sialic acid biosynthesis pathways in sugar metabolism. GFPT1, PGM3 and GNE are essential for synthesis of nucleotide sugars uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) and cytidine-5'-monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-sialic acid) as precursors for various glycosylation pathways. Defects in these enzymes result in contrasting clinical phenotypes of congenital myasthenia, immunodeficiency or adult-onset myopathy, respectively. We therefore discuss the biochemical mechanisms of known genetic defects in the hexosamine and CMP-sialic acid synthesis pathway in relation to the clinical phenotypes. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Both UDP-GlcNAc and CMP-sialic acid are important precursors for diverse protein glycosylation reactions and for conversion into other nucleotide-sugars. Defects in the synthesis of these nucleotide sugars might affect a wide range of protein glycosylation reactions. Involvement of multiple glycosylation pathways might contribute to disease phenotype, but the currently available biochemical information on sugar metabolism is insufficient to understand why defects in these pathways present with tissue-specific phenotypes. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Future research on the interplay between sugar metabolism and different glycosylation pathways in a tissue- and cell-specific manner will contribute to elucidation of disease mechanisms and will create new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Glycans in personalised medicine" Guest Editor: Professor Gordan Lauc.