Ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) in patients with acute brain injury-a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) is common after external ventricular drains (EVD) insertion but is difficult to diagnose in patients with acute brain injury. Previously, we proposed a set of criteria for ruling out VAI in traumatic brain injury. This study aimed to validate these criteria. For exploratory purposes, we sought to develop and validate a score for VAI risk assessment in patients with different types of severe acute brain injury. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults with acute brain injury who received an EVD and in whom CSF samples were taken over a period of 57 months. As standard non-coated bolt-connected EVDs were used. The predictive performance of biomarkers was analyzed as defined previously. A multivariable regression model was performed with five variables. RESULTS: A total of 683 patients with acute brain injury underwent EVD placement and had 1272 CSF samples; 92 (13.5%) patients were categorized as culture-positive VAI, 130 (19%) as culture-negative VAI, and 461 (67.5%) as no VAI. A low CSF WBC/RBC ratio (< 0.037), high CSF/plasma glucose ratio (> 0.6), and low CSF protein (< 0.5g/L) showed a positive predictive value of 0.09 (95%CI, 0.05-0.13). In the multivariable logistic regression model, days to sample (OR 1.09; 95%CI, 1.03-1.16) and CSF WBC/RBC ratio (OR 34.86; 95%CI, 3.94-683.15) were found to predict VAI. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute brain injury and an EVD, our proposed combined cut-off for ruling out VAI performed satisfactorily. Days to sample and CSF WBC/RBC ratio were found independent predictors for VAI in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Diagnostic criteria of CNS infection in patients with external ventricular drainage after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculostomy-related infection (VRI) is a common complication in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) treated with an external ventricular drain (EVD). The aim of this study was to investigate incidence and characteristics of patients with VRI, and to explore diagnostic criteria to confidently rule out VRI in patients with TBI. METHODS: This retrospective cohort pilot study included adults with severe TBI who were admitted to the ICU and received an EVD, during a 26-month period. Patients were categorized as having Culture-positive VRI, Culture-negative VRI, or No VRI. Variables that were potentially associated with Culture-positive VRI was analyzed, and predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: 75 of 215 patients with severe TBI (35%) underwent EVD placement; nine of these (12%) were classified as Culture-negative VRI and eight (11%) as Culture-positive VRI. The CSF cell counts that led to VRI treatment were compared with 46 CSF cell counts from No VRI patients. A CSF/plasma glucose ratio below 0.6 had a negative predictive value (NPV) for culture-verified VRI of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.85-1), whereas a combination of three CSF-derived biomarkers within the reference limits (white/red blood cell ratio, CSF/plasma glucose ratio, and protein content) ruled out Culture-positive VRI in this cohort (PPV 0, 95% CI: 0-0.14). C-reactive protein did not reliably predict VRI. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study of patients after severe, a combination of biomarkers within reference limits ruled out VRI (PPV 0, CI: 0-0.14). Hypoglycorrhachia was a sensitive marker of VRI (NPV 0.97, CI: 0.85-1). Systemic signs and markers of infection did not predict VRI.